Literature DB >> 32051192

Prognostic Significance of HPV DNA and p16INK4a in Anal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aivara Urbute1, Christina Louise Rasmussen1, Federica Belmonte2, Theresa Obermueller3, Elena-Sophie Prigge3, Marc Arbyn4, Freija Verdoodt1, Susanne K Kjaer5,6.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating survival in patients with anal cancer, according to human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, p16INK4a, and combined HPV DNA/p16INK4a status. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies published in English until July 25, 2018, directly providing or allowing estimation of survival of patients with anal cancer according to the presence of HPV DNA and/or overexpression of p16INK4a We estimated pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) using a random-effects model. We included 16 studies, comprising 1,724 patients with anal cancer tested for HPV DNA (65% positive), and 567 patients tested for p16INK4a (87% positive). The pooled HR for OS was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.33-0.89) for HPV DNA positive versus negative, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.24-0.57) for p16INK4a positive versus negative, and 0.36 (95% CI, 0.22-0.58) for HPV DNA positive/p16INK4a positive versus HPV DNA positive/p16INK4a negative patients with anal cancer. Patients with HPV DNA or p16INK4a positive anal cancer have significantly better OS compared with HPV DNA or p16INK4a negative. This points to the possible value of HPV DNA and/or p16INK4a testing when planning the management and follow-up strategy for patients diagnosed with anal cancer. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32051192     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  The effect of HPV DNA and p16 status on the prognosis of patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinfeng Shi; Ling Wang; Nan Yao; Le Sun; Wenyu Hu; Xiaotong Li; Yixue Yang; Yusheng Wang; Wei Zhu; Bo Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Practice of radiation therapy for anal cancer in Austria-a survey on behalf of the Austrian radiation oncology society gastrointestinal tumor group (ÖGRO-GIT).

Authors:  S Gerum; W Iglseder; R Schmid; K Peterka; T H Knocke-Abulesz; P Harl; S Schwaiger; I Reiter; J Salinger; C Venhoda; G Kurzweil; M Poetscher; R Jaeger; B Celedin; P Clemens; F Roeder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Correlation between microvessel density (MVD) and multi-spiral CT (MSCT) perfusion parameters of esophageal cancer lesions and the diagnostic value of combined CtBP2 and P16INK4A.

Authors:  Qinghua Li; Dong Cui; Yu Feng; Yanfei He; Zheng Shi; Rui Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06

4.  Improving five-year survival prediction via multitask learning across HPV-related cancers.

Authors:  Andre Goncalves; Braden Soper; Mari Nygård; Jan F Nygård; Priyadip Ray; David Widemann; Ana Paula Sales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.