| Literature DB >> 32050906 |
Zhibo Li1, Chunxu Song1,2, Yanglei Yi1,3, Oscar P Kuipers4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are good alternatives for chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which cause severe environmental problems worldwide. Even though many studies focus on PGPR, most of them are limited in plant-microbe interaction studies and neglect the pathogens affecting ruminants that consume plants. In this study, we expand the view to the food chain of grass-ruminant-human. We aimed to find biocontrol strains that can antagonize grass pathogens and mammalian pathogens originated from grass, thus protecting this food chain. Furthermore, we deeply mined into bacterial genomes for novel biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that can contribute to biocontrol.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus; Bacteriocins; Biosynthetic gene clusters; Brevibacillus; Nonribosomal peptides; Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; Polyketides
Year: 2020 PMID: 32050906 PMCID: PMC7017464 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6563-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Phylogenetic analysis of the 90 bacterial isolates in this study. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on partial 16S rRNA sequences was constructed with MEGA7 [26]. The sequences of reference strains were retrieved from the NCBI database. The reference strains are highlighted in blue and different groups were shaded with different colors
Antimicrobial activity of the seven selected bacterial strains from perennial ryegrass
| Pathogen types | Species or strains | MG27 | MG33 | MG43 | MG52 | MG64 | MG75 | MG84 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-negative bacteria | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | |
| + | + | + | – | + | – | – | ||
| + | + | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | ||
| + | + | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | ||
| + | + | + | – | + | – | – | ||
| + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | ||
| + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| Gram-positive bacteria | + | + | + | ++ | + | – | ++ | |
| Fungi | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ||
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ||
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ||
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ||
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ||
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ||
| Oomycetes | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ |
In the antibacterial assay, no inhibition (−), inhibitory zone < 5 mm (+), inhibitory zone ≥5 mm (++). In the antifungal/oomycetal assay, no inhibition (○), clear inhibition (●).
*Pathogens used to screen the isolated strains
#Mammalian pathogens
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of the selected strains and their reference strains based on the genomic sequences. The comparison was conducted with Gegenees using a default setting [34]. The dendrogram was constructed in SplitTree [35]. Different groups of bacteria were indicated with different colors of shading. The seven strains isolated in this study were indicated with red font
Fig. 3Numbers of BGCs harbored by the strains and the percentage of the total size of BGCs in the genomes. (a) total number of BGCs in the strains. (b) number of reported BGCs in the genomes of strains. (c) number of unknown BGCs found in the strains. BGCs that have different numbers of genes or show less than 70% protein identity to the reported ones were regarded as novel. (d) the percentage of BGCs sizes in the genomes
Fig. 4Potential intact and novel BGCs discovered in the genomes of selected strains. (a) an NRPS-PKS hybrid discovered in B. velezensis MG33. (b) a lichenysin-like NRPS-PKS hybrid present in the strains from the B. pumilus subgroup. (c) an unknown NRPS-PKS hybrid found in both B. pumilus MG52 and MG84. (d) a potential novel NRPS-PKS hybrid harbored by B. laterosporus MG64. (e-f) two potential novel NRPSs present in B. laterosporus MG64. Amino acid residues predicted by antiSMASH was indicated inside the A domains. Cluster number in the brackets corresponding to those in Fig. S2. Genes with different functions are shown in different colors: orange, additional biosynthetic genes; wine-red, core biosynthetic genes; grey, unknown-function genes
Fig. 5Potential novel bacteriocins with predicted precursor peptides. The BGCs were predicted by BAGEL4 [37]. (a) a circular bacteriocin found in both B. pumilus MG52 and MG84. (b-c) two circular bacteriocins discovered in B. altitudinis MG75. (d) a circular bacteriocin and (e) a lanthipeptide harbored by B. laterosporus MG64. The potential core peptides are indicated in red. The potential cleavage sites are indicated with arrows. The numbers indicate the position of amino acid residues