| Literature DB >> 32050519 |
Lei Xu1,2, Siyu Cheng3, Ping Zhuang1,4, Dongsheng Xie1,5, Shiyu Li1, Dongming Liu1,6, Zhian Li1,4, Faguo Wang1,6, Fuwu Xing1,6.
Abstract
Although eutrophication and biological invasion have caused serious harm to aquatic ecosystems, exotic and even invasive plants have been used extensively in phytoremediationEntities:
Keywords: eutrophication; floating macrophytes; nutrient removal; water purification
Year: 2020 PMID: 32050519 PMCID: PMC7037392 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Experimental scene on the first day: (a) all plants and (b) Eichhornia crassipes.
Figure 2Growth status of Ludwigia adscendens in swine manure wastewater: (a) day 0 and (b) day 15.
Figure 3Growth status of Trapa natans in swine manure wastewater: (a) day 0 and (b) day 15.
Figure 4Growth status of E. crassipes in two types of eutrophic water bodies: (a) to (c): the roots and leaves turned white and rotted gradually (in the swine manure wastewater); and (d) to (e) the roots were purple and grew vigorously (in the river).
Biomasses of floating aquatic macrophytes after 60 days of treatment in swine manure wastewater (g/pot, fresh weight).
| Treatment | Initial Fresh Weight | Harvest | Net Biomass Growth Rates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Total | |||
|
| 200.0 | 100.1 | 100.4 | 200.5 | 0.2% | |
|
| 200.0 | 91.6 | 103.5 | 776.7 | 971.8 | 385.9% |
|
| 200.0 | 423.3 | 400.2 | 456.2 | 1279.7 | 539.8% |
Note: Harvest 1 was on the 15th day of the experiment, Harvest 2 was on the 30th day, and Harvest 3 was on the 60th day (the same applies below).
Total nitrogen (TN) concentration and total uptake of floating aquatic macrophytes after 60 days of treatment in swine manure wastewater (mg/g, dry weight).
| Treatment | TN Content (mg/g, Dry Weight) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 1st Harvest | 2nd Harvest | 3rd Harvest | |||||
| Roots | Shoots | Fruit | Shoots | Shoots | Roots | Shoots | Fruit | |
|
| 15.81 | 31.85 | 10.00 | 22.30 | 15.62 | 11.23 | 11.50 | 7.06 |
|
| 31.42 | 18.23 | 11.30 | 10.56 | 6.32 | |||
Total phosphorus (TP) concentration and total uptake of floating aquatic macrophytes after 60 days of treatment in swine manure wastewater.
| Treatment | TP Content (mg/g, Dry Weight) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 1st harvest | 2nd harvest | 3rd harvest | |||||
| Roots | Shoot | Fruit | Shoots | Shoots | Roots | Shoots | Fruit | |
|
| 2.15 | 2.99 | 3.80 | 2.80 | 2.64 | 1.88 | 2.45 | 3.22 |
|
| 3.10 | 2.90 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 1.85 | |||
Figure 5Changes in physical and chemical indicators in wastewater: (PE) E. crassipes; (PL) L. adscendens; (BC) black control; (PT) T. natans (the same in the following figures). (A): the value of pH; (B): the concentration of DO; (C): the value of ORP; (D): the value of EC.
Figure 6Variations in N concentration and homologous removal rate in the experiment: (A) concentration and removal rate of TN; (B) concentration and removal rate of NH4+; (C) concentration and removal rate of NO3−; and (D) concentration and removal rate of NO2−.
Figure 7Variations in TP concentration and the homologous removal rate during experiment.
Figure 8Variations in Chl-a concentration and the homologous removal rate in the experiment.
Figure 9Variations in chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration and the homologous removal rate in the experiment.