| Literature DB >> 32050408 |
Kugalur Shanmugam Ranjith1, Ganji Seeta Rama Raju1, Nilesh R Chodankar1, Seyed Majid Ghoreishian2, Cheol Hwan Kwak2, Yun Suk Huh2, Young-Kyu Han1.
Abstract
A flexible asymmetric supercapacitor (Entities:
Keywords: FeMoO4 nanotubes; MnO2-rGO; asymmetric supercapacitors; electrospinning; rGO wrapping
Year: 2020 PMID: 32050408 PMCID: PMC7075176 DOI: 10.3390/nano10020289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the strategic growth of reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-functionalized bimetallic tubular nanofibers (NFs) (rGO–FeMoO4) via electrospinning followed by solution-based thermal functionalization.
Figure 1SEM images of (a,b) the FeMoO4 solid NFs; (c,d) the FeMoO4 tubular NFs; (e,f) the rGO–FeMoO4 tubular NFs; TEM images (g,h) of the rGO–FeMoO4 NF (inset: the SAED pattern of rGO-FeMoO4); (i) high-resolution TEM image of rGO–FeMoO4 NF; (j) elemental mapping images of the hybrid NF.
Figure 2Physical characterization of rGO–FeMoO4: (a) XRD pattern of FeMoO4-based NFs and the XPS spectra of the rGO–FeMoO4 NFs; (b) full survey spectrum; (c) Fe 2p; (d) Mo 3d; (e) C 1s (inset: N 1s spectra); (f) O 1s.
Figure 3Three-electrode electrochemical performance of the tubular FeMoO4, rGO and rGO–FeMoO4 electrodes in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution: (a) CV curve for the tubular FeMoO4 and rGO–FeMoO4 at 10 mV s−1; (b) CV curves for rGO–FeMoO4 at various scan rates; (c) GCD profile, and (d) IR drop for rGO–FeMoO4 at various current densities; (e) rate performances for FeMoO4 and rGO–FeMoO4 at various current densities; (f) Nyquist plot of the rGO–FeMoO4 electrode; and (g) the cyclic stability and coulombic efficiency at 1 A g−1. The inset images in (g) present the GCD, CV, and EIS spectra before and after cycling performances.
Figure 4(a,b) SEM (inset: low magnification view); (c–e) TEM images, and (f) corresponding SAED pattern of the rGO–MnO2 NRs; (g) Powder XRD spectra, and (h) the XPS full scan survey spectra of the rGO–MnO2@CC. The inset in (h) presents the high-resolution Mn 2p of rGO–MnO2 NRs.
Figure 5(a) CV curve of the rGO, MnO2 and rGO–MnO2 free-standing electrodes measured at the scan rate of 50 mV s−1; (b) CV curves of the rGO–MnO2 electrodes at various scan rates (1–200 mV s−1); (c) GCD curves and (d) rate performances for the rGO–MnO2 electrode at various current densities; (e) Nyquist plot and (f) cycling stability of the rGO–MnO2 electrode.
Figure 6(a) Schematic diagram of the constructed solid-state ASC device; (b) CV curves of the individual rGO–FeMoO4@CC and rGO–MnO2@CC electrodes at a scan rate of 30 mV s−1; (c) CV curves of the rGO–FeMoO4@CC/rGO–MnO2@CC within various potential windows at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1; (d) CV curves at various scan rates and (e) GCD curves at various current densities for the rGO–FeMoO4@CC/rGO–MnO2@CC ASC; (f) rate performances of FeMoO4@CC/rGO–MnO2@CC ASC; (g) comparative Nyquist plots before and after 5000 cycles; and (h) cyclic stability and coulombic efficiency of the rGO–FeMoO4@CC/rGO–MnO2@CC ASC at 4 A g−1.
Figure 7(a) Ragone plot comparing the rGO–MnO2@CC/rGO–FeMoO4@CC ASC device with previously reported results; (b) photographic image of LEDs lit up by three ASCs connected in series; (c) CV curves of the all-solid-state ASC under various bending angles, and (d) photographic images of the all-solid-state ASC bent at various positions.