Literature DB >> 32050207

Comparison of astigmatism correction between anterior penetrating and intrastromal arcuate incisions in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Sri Ganesh1, Sheetal Brar, Raghavender Reddy Arra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond laser-enabled anterior penetrating and intrastromal arcuate incisions for the correction of preoperative astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery.
SETTING: Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized comparison study.
METHODS: This study included 50 eyes of 50 patients who had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the CATALYS Precision System (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.). Twenty-five eyes received anterior penetrating and 25 eyes received intrastromal arcuate incisions for the correction of corneal astigmatism in the range of 0.75 to 2.00 diopters (D). Six months postoperatively, vector analysis of astigmatism was performed using the Alpins method with the ASSORT software.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative keratometric astigmatism and target-induced astigmatism were 1.07 D and 1.16 D in the anterior penetrating group and 1.23 D and 1.50 D in the intrastromal group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative keratometric astigmatism (anterior penetrating = 0.65, intrastromal = 0.90, P value = .13) and surgically induced astigmatism (anterior penetrating = 1.23, intrastromal = 1.08, P value = .55) at 6 months postoperatively. The correction index was 0.95 in the anterior penetrating group and 0.55 in the intrastromal group, signifying an undercorrection of 5% and 45% of eyes in the anterior penetrating and intrastromal group, respectively. Eighty percent of eyes in the anterior penetrating group and 72% of eyes in the intrastromal group were within ±0.5 D of refractive astigmatism.
CONCLUSIONS: Both anterior penetrating and intrastromal incisions were effective in reducing preoperative astigmatism using the femtosecond laser technology. However, the anterior penetrating incisions showed comparatively better correction, whereas the intrastromal incisions resulted in significant undercorrection at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32050207     DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Timoteo González-Cruces; Antonio Cano-Ortiz; María Carmen Sánchez-González; José-María Sánchez-González
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy for the management of corneal astigmatism in patients undergoing cataract surgery: Comparison with conventional cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hyunmin Ahn; Ikhyun Jun; Kyoung Yul Seo; Eung Kweon Kim; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Prediction of corneal astigmatism based on corneal tomography after femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy using a pix2pix conditional generative adversarial network.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Nan Cheng; Yunfang Liu; Junyang Song; Xinhua Liu; Suhua Zhang; Guanghua Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16

4.  Clinical Outcomes After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Arcuate Corneal Incisions versus Manual Incisions.

Authors:  Clayton Blehm; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.