Literature DB >> 32050109

Optimal design alternatives of advance guide signs of closely spaced exit ramps on urban expressways.

Lihua Huang1, Xiaohua Zhao2, Yang Li3, Jianming Ma4, Liping Yang5, Jian Rong6, Yu Wang7.   

Abstract

Advance guide signs for exit ramps along urban expressways are increasingly critical, enhancing safety and mobility by improving the flow of vehicles exiting urban expressways. However, research has devoted scant attention to advance guide signs for exit ramps. This study aimed to identify and propose optimal design alternatives for exit ramp advance guide signs for different types of exit spacing. This study conducted a driving simulation experiment consisting of five design alternatives of advance guide signs and two exit ramp spacing variation. Eight indicators were measured. The repeated-measure analysis of variances (ANOVA) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were performed for the influence analysis and efficiency evaluation of different schemes. Influence analysis results showed better design alternatives in five schemes of advance guide signs, enabling drivers to more easily locate destination exits and change lanes fewer times, in addition to reducing drivers' need to decelerate, and improving traffic flow in the key influence range of destination exit ramps. The percentage of drivers successfully locating the destination exits also increased with optimal design alternatives of advance guide signs. When the exit ramp spacing tightened, on the other hand, drivers had to make more lane changes and accelerate and decelerate more frequently in the key influence range. As a result, a lower percentage of drivers successfully located destination exits. Efficiency evaluation results were also obtained. In tight spacing, three advance guide signs are recommended to be placed at 1 km, 0.5 km and 0 km prior to the beginning of the tapered deceleration lane. If conditions are limited, at least two advance guide signs should be used. With greater spacing, four advance guide signs are recommended, located at 2 km, 1 km, 0.5 km, and 0 km prior to the beginning of the tapered deceleration lane. If road conditions are limited, three advance guide signs should be used.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance guide sign; Closely spaced exit ramps; Driving behavior; Driving simulator experiment; Optimal design alternatives; Urban expressway

Year:  2020        PMID: 32050109     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  3 in total

1.  Research on the effectiveness of a intersection risk warning system based on driving simulation experiment.

Authors:  Yiwen Zhou; Fengxiang Guo; Wenchen Yang; Huasen Wan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Analysis of Traffic Signs Information Volume Affecting Driver's Visual Characteristics and Driving Safety.

Authors:  Lei Han; Zhigang Du; Shoushuo Wang; Ying Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Eye-Tracking Evaluation of Exit Advance Guide Signs in Highway Tunnels in Familiar and Unfamiliar Drivers.

Authors:  Ting Shang; Hao Lu; Peng Wu; Yi Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.