Literature DB >> 32049572

Reliability of Maternal Recall of Feeding at the Breast and Breast Milk Expression 6 Years After Delivery.

Rui Li1,2, Taniqua T Ingol1, Katie Smith1, Reena Oza-Frank3,4, Sarah A Keim1,5,6.   

Abstract

Background: The reliability of long-term maternal recall of breastfeeding has been assessed previously, but not maternal milk expression (pumping) and child consumption of expressed milk. Objective: To examine the reliability of maternal recall of feeding at the breast, maternal milk expression, and child consumption of expressed milk 6 years after delivery using the Brief Breastfeeding and Milk Expression Recall Survey (BaByMERS).
Methods: At 12 months postpartum, women who delivered a singleton, live-born infant at >24 weeks of gestation at a major U.S. academic hospital completed BaByMERS. Five years later, they were recontacted to complete the same questionnaire. Kappa statistics (κ), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland/Altman plots examined agreement. Sociodemographics were examined through stratified comparisons.
Results: Of 299 women who completed both questionnaires, 35% had a postgraduate education and 82% identified as white/Caucasian. Kappa statistics showed substantial agreement for ever breastfeeding or feeding breast milk (combined) (κ = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.98) and ever feeding at the breast (κ = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89). Recall for duration of feeding at the breast was excellent (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.97), and of maternal milk expression was slightly less so (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.80-0.97). Maternal minority race/ethnicity, lower educational attainment, unmarried marital status, public/no health insurance, and smoking were associated with lower reliability; these differences were usually small and not consistent across all feeding practices. Conclusions: Maternal recall of contemporary lactation and infant feeding using BaByMERS was strongly reliable 6 years after delivery. BaByMERS may be useful to collect recall data, with attention to subpopulations that may exhibit lower recall reliability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; infant feeding practices; lactation; milk expression; pumping; recall bias

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32049572      PMCID: PMC7175623          DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2019.0186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breastfeed Med        ISSN: 1556-8253            Impact factor:   1.817


  26 in total

1.  Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events.

Authors:  C A Tomeo; J W Rich-Edwards; K B Michels; C S Berkey; D J Hunter; A L Frazier; W C Willett; S L Buka
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bernardo L Horta; Christian Loret de Mola; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 3.  The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice.

Authors:  Ruowei Li; Kelley S Scanlon; Mary K Serdula
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 4.  Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology.

Authors:  P F Watson; A Petrie
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C J Lodge; D J Tan; M X Z Lau; X Dai; R Tham; A J Lowe; G Bowatte; K J Allen; S C Dharmage
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Reliability of reported breastfeeding duration among reproductive-aged women from Mexico.

Authors:  Lea A Cupul-Uicab; Beth C Gladen; Mauricio Hernández-Avila; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  The accuracy of dietary recall of infant feeding and food allergen data.

Authors:  Z van Zyl; K Maslin; T Dean; R Blaauw; C Venter
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.089

8.  Breastmilk sharing: awareness and participation among women in the Moms2Moms Study.

Authors:  Sarah A Keim; Kelly A McNamara; Chelsea E Dillon; Katherine Strafford; Rachel Ronau; Lara B McKenzie; Sheela R Geraghty
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Recall of age of weaning and other breastfeeding variables.

Authors:  Brenda Gillespie; Hannah d'Arcy; Kendra Schwartz; Janet Kay Bobo; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.461

Review 10.  Understanding Bland Altman analysis.

Authors:  Davide Giavarina
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  3 in total

1.  The association between duration of breastfeeding and childhood asthma outcomes.

Authors:  Keadrea Wilson; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Margaret A Adgent; Christine Loftus; Catherine Karr; Paul E Moore; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Nora Byington; Emily Barrett; Nicole Bush; Ruby Nguyen; Terry J Hartman; Kaja Z LeWinn; Alexis Calvert; W Alex Mason; Kecia N Carroll
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.248

2.  Effect of Cold Storage on the Viable and Total Bacterial Populations in Human Milk.

Authors:  Lisa F Stinson; Michelle L Trevenen; Donna T Geddes
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Association of Infant Feeding Methods and Excess Weight from Birth to Age 6.

Authors:  Jennifer M Maskarinec; Rui Li; Melissa E Kravets; Kelly M Boone; Sarah A Keim
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.335

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.