Pulmonary endothelial dysfunction is a characteristic of
pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and is believed to be an early event that
determines many of the other key pathological processes in the development of this
devastating condition. Pathways involved in the regulation of blood vessel formation and
repair are relevant to the formation of pulmonary vascular lesions and restoration of
distal pulmonary perfusion in PAH. Thus, established angiopoietic and angiostatic
factors have been a focus of targeted research studies in recent years.A decade ago, Kümpers and colleagues reported finding elevated circulating
concentrations of angiopoietin 1 and its inhibitor angiopoietin 2 in a study of 104
patients with idiopathic PAH (1). Angiopoietin 2
alone was prognostic of, and expression in patient lung tissues was associated with, the
formation of plexogenic lesions, where it might function to destabilize established
vessels at initiation of remodeling. A more recent study confirmed the lack of
association between circulating angiopoietin 1 and outcomes in patients with pulmonary
hypertension, with no differences in etiologies, including connective tissue disease,
left heart dysfunction, and chronic thromboembolic disease–associated forms of
pulmonary hypertension (2). Following from an
in vivo observation of aggravated pulmonary hypertension in hypoxic
mice overexpressing another regulator of endothelial function, angiostatin (3), Jurasz and colleagues observed elevated
angiostatin concentrations in platelets of six patients with idiopathic PAH compared
with matched healthy control subjects (4).
Angiostatin was able to trigger endothelial microfragment formation, consistent with its
role as a stimulator of endothelial apoptosis.More recently, Damico and colleagues documented elevated circulating concentrations of
the peptide derived from the carboxy terminus of collagen XVII, α1, endostatin
(ES), in a cohort of 132 patients with PAH compared with healthy control subjects (5). ES was associated with multiple measures of
disease severity, and concentrations above 95 ng/ml correlated with worse survival in
two independent cohorts of patients (n = 82 with PAH
and n = 50 with idiopathic PAH, respectively). The
authors also screened 12 genomic variants in the COL18A1 gene (encoding
collagen XVII, α1, and hence ES) and identified one, rs12483377, at higher minor
allele frequency (21.6%) than available controls (7.5%). This variant encodes an
asparagine (N) residue at position 104 of ES in place of the ancestral aspartic acid
(D). Heterozygotes for this variant had approximately half the circulating ES
concentration of reference patients and significantly better outcomes in both cohorts
studied. This led to the suggestion that the enrichment of this variant may be driven by
survival bias in recruitment, which may potentially explain why the locus was not one of
those found to be associated with development of PAH in the recent international
genome-wide association study of PAH (6). In
over 120,000 individuals registered in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomad.broadinstitute.org), the minor allele frequency is 0.066, with
the highest listed frequency at 0.10 in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, making the 0.21
observed in PAH notable (5). However, in the
largest substudy of the PAH genome-wide association study, the National Institute for
Health Research BioResource PAH population had an allele frequency of 0.084
(P = 0.69), indicating no enrichment (6). Further analysis in large, genotyped PAH
populations with sufficient follow-up should establish the relevance of rs12483377 to
PAH progression.In this issue of the Journal (pp. 524–534), Goyanes and
colleagues (7) show that ES inhibits pulmonary
endothelial cell (PEC) proliferation and migration and promotes apoptosis in in
vitro analyses. Published data in human umbilical vein endothelial cells
suggested that ES reduces expression of ID1 (inhibitor of
differentiation/DNA binding 1), well known in PAH as a downstream target of
BMPR2 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2) signaling.
Surprisingly, the authors found little effect of ES on Id1 mRNA in PECs
but substantially reduced protein expression, which they were able to rescue with
inhibition of the proteasome using MG132, suggesting a difference in regulation of
Id1 by ES in PECs versus systemic endothelial cells. Rescue of ES
effects was also possible through overexpression of Id1. MG132 was also
able to prevent the induction of release of the Id1 target, TSP-1
(thrombospondin 1), from PECs by ES, again emphasizing the importance of the proteasome
in the effects of ES stimulation. TSP-1 itself was of particular interest because it is
also a known endostatic regulator that was elevated in plasma samples from 93 patients
with PAH, also relating to poor outcomes (8).
Furthermore, knockdown of TSP-1 was able to prevent the PEC functional effects of ES in
this study. TSP-1 can bind multiple receptors, including CD36 and CD47, and the authors
demonstrated that CD36 was required for inhibition of migration by ES or TSP-1, whereas
both receptors were required for their effects on proliferation and apoptosis. Finally,
short ES-derived peptides containing either reference or variant residue 104
(ES99–111D104 and ES99–111N104, respectively) were shown to have
differential effects on migration but no effect on proliferation. This again contrasts
with studies on human umbilical vein endothelial cells that indicated equal function of
the variant peptides on tube formation (which requires migratory function) (9). The differential effect on migration and
proliferation suggests that distinct mechanisms are relevant to these functions of ES.
For example, as well as circulating concentrations, residue 104 may affect activation of
or binding to CD36 but not CD47, but this requires further experimental evidence to
prove.The inability of circulating ES to inform prognosis independent of established clinical
severity markers, including 6-minute-walk distance, World Health Organization functional
class, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (5), precludes its use as a prognostic biomarker in PAH, but it could still
be of value, alongside genotyping of the key variant, to select patients for therapy if
strategies targeting the ES–ID1–TSP-1 axis were successful. It would also
be interesting to investigate whether TSP-1 concentrations are altered by the genetic
variant that determines ES expression. Some of the rescue strategies used in in
vitro studies (MG132, CD36 knockdown) are not sufficiently selective, so
more precise strategies, potentially targeting the interaction between TSP-1 and the CD
receptors or enhancing ID1 activation, may prove worthwhile to pursue and could perhaps
be tested in vivo in models overexpressing ES or its derived,
functional peptides.
Authors: Alice M Goyanes; Aigul Moldobaeva; Mery Marimoutou; Lidenys C Varela; Lan Wang; Laura F Johnston; Meena M Aladdin; Grace L Peloquin; Bo S Kim; Mahendra Damarla; Karthik Suresh; Takahiro Sato; Todd M Kolb; Paul M Hassoun; Rachel L Damico Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Gordon R Macpherson; Arun S Singh; Charles L Bennett; David J Venzon; David J Liewehr; Michael E Franks; William L Dahut; Philip W Kantoff; Douglas K Price; William D Figg Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2004-12-16 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Philipp Kümpers; Nils Nickel; Alexander Lukasz; Heiko Golpon; Volker Westerkamp; Karen M Olsson; Danny Jonigk; Lavinia Maegel; Clemens L Bockmeyer; Sascha David; Marius M Hoeper Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Rachel Damico; Todd M Kolb; Lidenys Valera; Lan Wang; Traci Housten; Ryan J Tedford; David A Kass; Nicholas Rafaels; Li Gao; Kathleen C Barnes; Raymond L Benza; James L Rand; Rizwan Hamid; James E Loyd; Ivan M Robbins; Anna R Hemnes; Wendy K Chung; Eric D Austin; M Bradley Drummond; Stephen C Mathai; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Manuel Jonas Richter; Svenja Lena Tiede; Natascha Sommer; Thomas Schmidt; Werner Seeger; Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani; Ralph Schermuly; Henning Gall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher J Rhodes; Ken Batai; Marta Bleda; Matthias Haimel; Laura Southgate; Marine Germain; Michael W Pauciulo; Charaka Hadinnapola; Jurjan Aman; Barbara Girerd; Amit Arora; Jo Knight; Ken B Hanscombe; Jason H Karnes; Marika Kaakinen; Henning Gall; Anna Ulrich; Lars Harbaum; Inês Cebola; Jorge Ferrer; Katie Lutz; Emilia M Swietlik; Ferhaan Ahmad; Philippe Amouyel; Stephen L Archer; Rahul Argula; Eric D Austin; David Badesch; Sahil Bakshi; Christopher Barnett; Raymond Benza; Nitin Bhatt; Harm J Bogaard; Charles D Burger; Murali Chakinala; Colin Church; John G Coghlan; Robin Condliffe; Paul A Corris; Cesare Danesino; Stéphanie Debette; C Gregory Elliott; Jean Elwing; Melanie Eyries; Terry Fortin; Andre Franke; Robert P Frantz; Adaani Frost; Joe G N Garcia; Stefano Ghio; Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani; J Simon R Gibbs; John Harley; Hua He; Nicholas S Hill; Russel Hirsch; Arjan C Houweling; Luke S Howard; Dunbar Ivy; David G Kiely; James Klinger; Gabor Kovacs; Tim Lahm; Matthias Laudes; Rajiv D Machado; Robert V MacKenzie Ross; Keith Marsolo; Lisa J Martin; Shahin Moledina; David Montani; Steven D Nathan; Michael Newnham; Andrea Olschewski; Horst Olschewski; Ronald J Oudiz; Willem H Ouwehand; Andrew J Peacock; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Zia Rehman; Ivan Robbins; Dan M Roden; Erika B Rosenzweig; Ghulam Saydain; Laura Scelsi; Robert Schilz; Werner Seeger; Christian M Shaffer; Robert W Simms; Marc Simon; Olivier Sitbon; Jay Suntharalingam; Haiyang Tang; Alexander Y Tchourbanov; Thenappan Thenappan; Fernando Torres; Mark R Toshner; Carmen M Treacy; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Quinten Waisfisz; Anna K Walsworth; Robert E Walter; John Wharton; R James White; Jeffrey Wilt; Stephen J Wort; Delphine Yung; Allan Lawrie; Marc Humbert; Florent Soubrier; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Inga Prokopenko; Richard Kittles; Stefan Gräf; William C Nichols; Richard C Trembath; Ankit A Desai; Nicholas W Morrell; Martin R Wilkins Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 30.700