Ambient air pollution clearly associates with adverse health
effects (1) and is a top 10 contributor to the
global disease burden (2). Despite efforts to
regulate these exposures, adverse health effects remain. Therefore, in parallel with
mitigation efforts, we need to focus on understanding the factors that drive an
individual’s susceptibility to air pollution. Conceptually, these are defined as
gene-by-environment interactions (3). In this
framework, an individual’s genetic composition influences his or her response to
exposures in the environment. However, we are increasingly aware that nongenetic host
factors, such as age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and diet, influence air pollution
responses. The interactions between these factors are just beginning to be unraveled.
For example, recent literature has identified that ozone (O3) pulmonary
responses have sex-specific effects. Work in several laboratories has shown that male
and female mice exhibit different O3-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR)
(4) and that these effects are related to
sex hormones (5, 6) or sex-dependent effects on the microbiome (7). Although modification of sex hormones
represents an interesting experimental target, as a target strategy to reduce
O3 health effects it may have limited appeal. Alternatively, the
microbiome can be modified by diet, and therefore dietary modifications might be a
viable strategy.In this issue of the Journal, Tashiro and colleagues (pp. 503–512)
explore the effect of dietary modifications on pulmonary responses to acute
O3 exposure (8). Using mice fed
diets enriched in different types of dietary fiber (pectin and cellulose) or a
fiber-free diet, they made several interesting observations that were sex dependent. In
male mice, a pectin-enriched diet elicited a mild increase in O3-induced AHR
at the highest methacholine dose, whereas a cellulose-enriched diet caused a pronounced
reduction in AHR. In contrast, female mice exhibited augmented O3-induced AHR
responses to both the pectin- and cellulose-enriched diets. A fiber-free diet did not
impact O3-induced AHR in male mice. Contrary to what might be expected given
their augmented responses to pectin and cellulose diets, female mice fed a fiber-free
diet also exhibited enhanced AHR, similar to their responses to a fiber-enriched diet.
These AHR effects appear to be largely dissociated from O3-induced injury or
inflammatory effects, suggesting that in this model, injury was not driving the AHR
responses. To explore potential mechanisms of the diet- and sex-dependent AHR responses,
the authors measured sex hormones and also gave the mice fed a fiber-free diet
propionate to decrease short-chain fatty acids. Propionate administration did not alter
AHR in females fed a fiber-free diet, and sex hormones did not associate with the
sex-dependent diet phenotypes. Based on these findings, the authors evaluated
sex-dependent, diet-induced changes in the microbiome to explain the observed
phenotypes. Greater biodiversity and richness were found in the male mice fed a
cellulose diet as compared with a pectin diet, and overall less effect was noted in the
female mice fed either diet. However, the use of a fiber-free diet in female mice had a
much greater effect on microbiome community structure. A statistical analysis to
identify potential associations revealed that four taxa
(Enterococcaceae, Lactobacillius,
Blautia, and Streptococcaceae) associated with the
observed sex differences in diet responses to O3-induced AHR.The data presented by Tashiro and colleagues build on a body of research, largely
developed by this laboratory group, exploring the role of the microbiome in
O3-induced pulmonary responses (9). This includes identifying augmented O3 responses in obesemice
and sex-dependent O3 responses driven by alterations in the microbiome (7, 10).
Collectively, these data support the concept that the microbiome is a central regulator
of acute O3-induced pulmonary responses. Beyond this central observation,
various conditions, such as obesity and sex, alter the microbiome, thereby driving these
phenotypic responses. By looking at diet as a modifier of the microbiome, the authors
begin to explore dietary modifications as a potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate
O3-induced health effects. Provocatively, their data suggest that dietary
interventions need to be tailored to the sex of the individual. Based on the body of
literature suggesting that sex differences affect a variety of biologic responses, this
is perhaps not surprising, but it does suggest that consideration of diet modifications
will need to incorporate sex as a response variable.Questions remain unanswered by this study. The observations of sex-dependent,
diet-induced microbiome effects and O3-induced AHR are associative but not
causal. Causality could be inferred from prior studies (7, 9) but requires confirmation.
Specifically, their data suggest that specific microbiome taxa drive
O3-induced responses, but taxa-specific effects were not defined. These
responses could be assessed in germ-free mice colonized with individual taxa to confirm
the effects. In addition, the mechanisms that link alterations in gut microbial
responses to O3 responses and specifically AHR were largely unexplored. For
example, it remains unclear whether changes in the gut microbiome are representative of
the pulmonary microbiome in this model, and whether changes in the pulmonary microbiome
drive the O3 responses or are principally caused by the gut microbiome.
Furthermore, the authors do not define whether the AHR effects are direct (by modifying
smooth muscle contraction) or indirect (by affecting immune cell or epithelial cell
functions). These questions need to be addressed to better delineate the role of the
microbiome in air pollution responses.An important caveat needs to be raised about the present study, which focuses on
responses in C57BL/6 mice. O3 studies typically use the C57BL/6 strain
because of its documented O3 sensitivity (11). However, the composition of the gut microbiome exhibits strain
variations (12). It is therefore possible that
different diet- and sex-specific effects would be observed in other murine strains. In
addition, data suggest that microbiomes and immune responses in mice can vary according
to housing conditions and vendors (13). Given
the greater genetic and environmental diversity of human populations, the effects of
individual genetic variables and environments on microbiome composition and dietary
responses will need to be considered. It will be particularly important to consider
these effects before initiating human studies focused on diet interventions to mitigate
the adverse health effects of air pollution. On that basis, these results need to be
interpreted with caution regarding the specific experimental conditions. Nevertheless,
this new study continues to demonstrate the importance of the microbiome in air
pollution responses and reveals greater complexity in the interactions between humans
and their environment, and how these interactions drive the adverse health effects of
air pollution.
Authors: Robert P Dickson; John R Erb-Downward; Nicole R Falkowski; Ellen M Hunter; Shanna L Ashley; Gary B Huffnagle Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Hiroki Tashiro; David I Kasahara; Ross S Osgood; Traci Brown; Aline Cardoso; Youngji Cho; Stephanie A Shore Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Anastasiya Birukova; Jaime Cyphert-Daly; Robert Ian Cumming; Yen-Rei Yu; Kymberly M Gowdy; Loretta G Que; Robert M Tighe Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Youngji Cho; Galeb Abu-Ali; Hiroki Tashiro; Traci A Brown; Ross S Osgood; David I Kasahara; Curtis Huttenhower; Stephanie A Shore Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Aaron J Cohen; Michael Brauer; Richard Burnett; H Ross Anderson; Joseph Frostad; Kara Estep; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Bert Brunekreef; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Valery Feigin; Greg Freedman; Bryan Hubbell; Amelia Jobling; Haidong Kan; Luke Knibbs; Yang Liu; Randall Martin; Lidia Morawska; C Arden Pope; Hwashin Shin; Kurt Straif; Gavin Shaddick; Matthew Thomas; Rita van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; Theo Vos; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad H Forouzanfar Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew J Halayko; Christopher D Pascoe; Jessica D Gereige; Michael C Peters; Robyn T Cohen; Prescott G Woodruff Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405