Anna E Notier1, Polly Hager2, Karen S Brown3, Laura Petersen4, Louise Bedard5, Graham W Warren6. 1. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. Cancer Prevention and Control Section, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI. 3. Tobacco Prevention and Control Section, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI. 4. Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI. 5. Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although smoking by patients with cancer and survivors causes adverse outcomes, many patients with cancer do not receive access to evidence-based tobacco use treatment. The purpose of this article is to report on delivery of tobacco use treatment to patients with cancer using a state-supported Quitline. METHODS: Statewide agencies in Michigan partnered with the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium to develop and implement a clinical quality improvement initiative with the goal of addressing tobacco use by patients with cancer across Michigan oncology practices. The collaborative designed an opt-out approach for identifying tobacco users and referring them to the Michigan Tobacco Quitline (hereafter known as Quitline) within participating practices. As the initiative progressed, patients with cancer who were not referred through the initiative also became eligible for enrollment in the Quitline program. RESULTS: A total of 4,347 patients with cancer enrolled in the Quitline between 2012 and 2017, and annual referrals from oncology practices increased from 364 (5% of Quitline participants) to 876 (17% of Quitline participants). The 2013-2016 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System also demonstrated an increase from 60% to 80% of cancer survivors receiving smoking cessation resources. Of 3,892 patients with cancer who had Quitline follow-up data through 2017, 79% completed one or more counseling calls. The 6-month self-reported quit rate for patients with cancer assessed between 2013 and 2016 was 26%. CONCLUSION: Using statewide resources to increase access to evidence-based smoking cessation assistance to patients with cancer is achievable. In an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment, collaborative initiatives that use or enhance existing resources should be considered and refined to deliver effective evidence-based care.
PURPOSE: Although smoking by patients with cancer and survivors causes adverse outcomes, many patients with cancer do not receive access to evidence-based tobacco use treatment. The purpose of this article is to report on delivery of tobacco use treatment to patients with cancer using a state-supported Quitline. METHODS: Statewide agencies in Michigan partnered with the Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium to develop and implement a clinical quality improvement initiative with the goal of addressing tobacco use by patients with cancer across Michigan oncology practices. The collaborative designed an opt-out approach for identifying tobacco users and referring them to the Michigan Tobacco Quitline (hereafter known as Quitline) within participating practices. As the initiative progressed, patients with cancer who were not referred through the initiative also became eligible for enrollment in the Quitline program. RESULTS: A total of 4,347 patients with cancer enrolled in the Quitline between 2012 and 2017, and annual referrals from oncology practices increased from 364 (5% of Quitline participants) to 876 (17% of Quitline participants). The 2013-2016 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System also demonstrated an increase from 60% to 80% of cancer survivors receiving smoking cessation resources. Of 3,892 patients with cancer who had Quitline follow-up data through 2017, 79% completed one or more counseling calls. The 6-month self-reported quit rate for patients with cancer assessed between 2013 and 2016 was 26%. CONCLUSION: Using statewide resources to increase access to evidence-based smoking cessation assistance to patients with cancer is achievable. In an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment, collaborative initiatives that use or enhance existing resources should be considered and refined to deliver effective evidence-based care.
Authors: Elisa K Tong; Terri Wolf; David T Cooke; Nathan Fairman; Moon S Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Meghan Meadows-Taylor; Kenneth D Ward; Weiyu Chen; Nicholas R Faris; Carrie Fehnel; Meredith A Ray; Folabi Ariganjoye; Courtney Berryman; Cheryl Houston-Harris; Laura M McHugh; Alicia Pacheco; Raymond U Osarogiagbon Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2021-05-07
Authors: Heather D'Angelo; Sarah D Hohl; Betsy Rolland; Robert T Adsit; Danielle Pauk; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: David A Katz; Sarah L Mott; Jane A Utech; Autumn C Bahlmann; Kimberly A Dukes; Aaron T Seaman; Douglas E Laux; Muhammad Furqan; Zachary J Pollock; Mark W Vander Weg Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Thulasee Jose; Joshua W Ohde; J Taylor Hays; Michael V Burke; David O Warner Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390