Literature DB >> 32048330

Heparin vs bivalirudin anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Haya Kaseer1,2, Matthew Soto-Arenall1, Devang Sanghavi3, John Moss3, Robert Ratzlaff3, Si Pham4, Pramod Guru3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induces hemostatic alterations that may contribute to hematological complications. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the mainstay antithrombotic in ECMO and depends on antithrombin III (AT III) to exhibit its actions. However, it bears the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor and is inherently not dependent on AT III. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of UFH compared with bivalirudin during ECMO support.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 52 adult patients who were supported by ECMO from 1 January 2013 to 1 September 2018. Among them, 33 received UFH and 19 received bivalirudin. We analyzed their 7-day rate of composite thrombotic, bleeding, and mortality episodes while on anticoagulation.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the 7-day rate of composite thrombosis (33.3% vs 26.3%; P = 0.60), major bleeding (18.2% vs 5.3%; P = .24), 30-day mortality, (42.4% vs 26.3%; P = .37), or in-hospital mortality (45.5% vs 36.8%; P = .58). The percentage of time activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was within the therapeutic range was higher with bivalirudin (50% vs 85.7%; P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that UFH and bivalirudin are associated with similar rates of thrombosis, major bleeding, and mortality events in patients supported by ECMO. However, it was observed that bivalirudin consistently maintained aPTT within the therapeutic range in comparison to UFH.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aorta and great vessels; cardiovascular pathology; cardiovascular research; coronary artery disease; perfusion; transplant

Year:  2020        PMID: 32048330     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  7 in total

Review 1.  Continuous renal replacement therapy in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  David T Selewski; Keith M Wille
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.886

2.  The Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in the Anticoagulation Therapy of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Min Ma; Shichu Liang; Jingbo Zhu; Manyu Dai; Zhuoran Jia; He Huang; Yong He
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients treated with heparin or direct thrombin inhibitors during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  René M'Pembele; Sebastian Roth; Aljoscha Metzger; Anthony Nucaro; Alexandra Stroda; Amin Polzin; Markus W Hollmann; Giovanna Lurati Buse; Ragnar Huhn
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complications in Heparin- and Bivalirudin-Treated Patients.

Authors:  Katherine Giuliano; Benjamin F Bigelow; Eric W Etchill; Ana K Velez; Chin Siang Ong; Chun W Choi; Errol Bush; Sung-Min Cho; Glenn J R Whitman
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 5.  Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Adamantios Tsangaris; Tamas Alexy; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Andrea Elliott; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-07

6.  Management of Upper Airway Bleeding in COVID-19 Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Phillip S LoSavio; Tirth Patel; Matthew J Urban; Bobby Tajudeen; Peter Papagiannopoulos; Peter C Revenaugh; Inna Husain; Pete S Batra
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 7.  A Review of Bivalirudin for Pediatric and Adult Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Tori Taylor; Christopher T Campbell; Brian Kelly
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.