| Literature DB >> 32047523 |
Lirong Fan1, Huimin Yan1, Xiaofang Zhen1, Xiaoming Wu1, Jing Hao1, Linyi Hou1, Lei Han1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: At present, the most appropriate management of Henoch-Schonlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) with nephrotic-range proteinuria still remains controversial; thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Qingre-Lishi-Yishen Formula (QLYF), integrated with regular oral glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide intravenous pulse therapeutic regimen in children suffered from moderately severe HSPN with nephrotic proteinuria.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32047523 PMCID: PMC7007748 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3920735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Basic herbal composition of traditional Chinese herbal decoction QLYF.
| TCM materials | Equivalent pharmaceutical name | Amount (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Feng Wei Cao |
| 15 |
| Yi Yi Ren |
| 30 |
| Ku Shen |
| 10 |
| Shi Wei |
| 12 |
| Dao Kou Cao |
| 15 |
| Bai Jiang Cao |
| 10 |
| Lian Qiao |
| 10 |
| Chi Shao |
| 10 |
| Shan Yao |
| 15 |
| Pu Huang |
| 10 |
| Lian Xu |
| 10 |
| Dan Dou Chi |
| 12 |
| Chi Xiao dou |
| 30 |
| Qian Shi |
| 20 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the clinical research.
Basic clinical characteristics for all patients.
| Control group ( | QLYF group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 26 (52%) | 56 (56%) | 0.643 |
| Age (year) | 9.32 ± 2.68 | 9.52 ± 2.96 | 0.692 |
|
| |||
| GI involvement | 23 (46%) | 41 (41%) | 0.559 |
| Joint involvement | 17 (34%) | 21 (21%) | 0.127 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 108.2 ± 12.6 | 109.5 ± 11.3 | 0.543 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 38.45 ± 5.21 | 33.11 ± 6.45 | 0.204 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.45 ± 1.41 | 4.46 ± 1.52 | 0.970 |
| Creatine ( | 46.57 ± 7.24 | 45.13 ± 7.93 | 0.283 |
| eGFR(ml/min·1.73 m2) | 97.5 ± 16.0 | 99.6 ± 10.2 | 0.314 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.62 ± 0.90 | 1.44 ± 0.94 | 0.275 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.87 ± 1.11 | 4.63 ± 1.19 | 0.235 |
| URBC (/HP) | 26.88 ± 11.16 | 25.92 ± 11.06 | 0.618 |
| 24 h proteinuria (g) | 2.76 ± 0.88 | 2.70 ± 0.73 | 0.659 |
| Serum IgA (g/L) | 1.97 ± 0.68 | 1.84 ± 0.66 | 0.278 |
| Serum C3 (g/L) | 0.993 ± 0.271 | 0.991 ± 0.251 | 0.976 |
| Serum C4 (g/L) | 0.732 ± 0.615 | 0.578 ± 0.459 | 0.170 |
GI: gastrointestinal; SBP: systolic blood pressure; URBC: urine red blood cell count; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; 24 h: 24 hour.
Comparison of adverse events of two groups.
| Adverse events | Control group, | QLYF group, |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total adverse events rate | 42 (84%) | 66 (66%) | 5.357 | 0.022 |
| Respiratory infection | 29 (58%) | 37 (37%) | 5.966 | 0.023 |
| Urinary infection | 13 (26%) | 11 (11%) | 5.580 | 0.031 |
| Infectious diarrhea | 3 (6%) | 3 (3%) | 0.195 | 0.401 |
| Poor appetite | 13 (26%) | 10 (10%) | 6.573 | 0.015 |
| Hepatotoxicity | 17 (34%) | 18 (18%) | 4.770 | 0.040 |
| Cardiotoxicity | 18 (36%) | 18 (18%) | 5.921 | 0.035 |
| Neutropenia | 3 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 3.444 | 0.036 |
| Others | 10 (20%) | 7 (7%) | 5.606 | 0.027 |
Rare adverse events, such as fungal infection, secondary hypertension, secondary diabetes mellitus, secondary ocular hypertension, and dyslipidemia.
Comparison of short-term renal indexes between two groups.
| Time point | Group | Creatine ( | Urea (mmol/L) | 24 h proteinuria (g) | URBC (HP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior treatment | Control group | 46.57 ± 7.24 | 4.45 ± 1.41 | 2.76 ± 0.88 | 26.88 ± 11.16 |
| QLYF group | 45.13 ± 7.93 | 4.46 ± 1.52 | 2.70 ± 0.73 | 25.92 ± 11.06 | |
| 3-month treatment | Control group | 43.13 ± 5.85 | 4.12 ± 1.22 | 1.37 ± 0.45 | 12.64 ± 5.78 |
| QLYF group | 41.52 ± 6.01 | 4.09 ± 1.32 | 1.20 ± 0.42 | 9.80 ± 4.22 | |
| 6-month treatment | Control group | 40.41 ± 5.19 | 3.75 ± 1.24 | 0.42 ± 0.24 | 5.16 ± 7.52 |
| QLYF group | 39.14 ± 5.61 | 3.74 ± 1.28 | 0.31 ± 0.18 | 2.46 ± 1.35 |
p < 0.05 compared with the same group prior treatment; #p < 0.05 compared with the same group in 3-month treatment; ˄p < 0.05 compared with the control group in the same treatment period.
Comparison of therapeutic evaluation for two groups at the end of 2-year follow-up.
| Group | Proteinuria | Haematuria | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical control rate | Effective rate | Recurrence rate | Clinical control rate | Effective rate | Recurrence rate | |
| Control group | 41 (82%) | 42 (84%) | 10 (20%) | 37 (74%) | 40 (80%) | 18 (36%) |
| QLYF group | 85 (85%) | 91 (91%) | 7 (7%) | 89 (89%) | 94 (94%) | 15 (15%) |
| χ2 | 0.223 | 1.625 | 5.606 | 5.580 | 6.856 | 8.566 |
|
| 0.643 | 0.274 | 0.027 | 0.031 | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Primary TCM syndrome score was compared between two groups at the different time points.
| Time | QLYF group | Control group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 38 (28, 50) | 38 (30, 49) | −0.579 | 0.563 |
| 12-month | 20 (16, 27.5) | 25 (18, 30.5) | −2.780 | 0.005 |
| 24-month | 8 (6, 12) | 12 (8, 16) | −3.437 | 0.001 |
Compared with the 0-week baseline data, after 4-week, and 12-week routinely treatment; the TCM syndrome score was statistically significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Participants' traditional Chinese medicine syndromes distribution in two groups at the different time points. DHS: dampness-heat accumulation syndrome. YDS: Yang deficiency syndrome. YEFS: Yin deficiency with effulgent fire syndrome. HCS: heat-toxin congestion syndrome. BSS: blood stasis syndrome. PDS: phlegm-damp syndrome. SDQSS: spleen-deficiency and qi-stagnation syndrome.