Literature DB >> 32047040

Reply to Peng and Zhao: Loss of endocytic protein TOM1 in Alzheimer's disease.

Alessandra C Martini1, David Baglietto-Vargas2,3,4, Rodrigo Medeiros2,5, Frank M LaFerla2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32047040      PMCID: PMC7049100          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917743117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
We described a reduction of target of Myb1 (TOM1) protein levels by Western blot in the postmortem hippocampus of subjects with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) versus nondemented subjects (1), validating similar findings by an independent research group in a separate human cohort (2). Based on single-cell transcriptomic data (3), Peng and Zhao (4) conclude that TOM1 levels are, contrariwise to our findings, higher in AD. Although we do not disagree with their hypothesis that TOM1 expression could be up-regulated in AD, at least at early disease stages, precautions should be taken when comparing our findings to theirs. First, we determined the protein levels in the hippocampus whereas the RNAseq was performed in the prefrontal cortex. Discrepancies could therefore be related to differential patterns of expression in distinct brain regions, as well as the poor association between RNA and protein levels. Another explanation is the methodology applied by Peng and Zhao (4) to interpret the transcriptomic data. In the original study, comparison of gene expression in cells isolated from subjects with AD versus nondemented subjects has demonstrated that TOM1 is not among the 1,031 unique differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Due to the numerous challenges of single-cell transcriptomic studies, it is not surprising that only a small fraction of highly expressing genes could be differentially detected (5). Although excitatory neurons from the nonpathology group show slightly higher differential expression values of TOM1 versus those from early- and late-pathology groups (IndModel.adj.pvals 1.01E-07 and 6.14E-23, respectively), these differences did not reach the overall criteria of significance (DEGs.Ind.Model and DEGs.Ind.Mix.models) (Tables 1–3).
Table 1.

Differential expression of TOM1 between no-pathology and pathology groups

Cell typeIndModel.adj.pvalNo.pathology.meanPathology.meanIndModel.FCMixedModel.zMixedModel.pDEGs.Ind.ModelDEGs.Ind.Mix.models
EX3.00E-170.1289260050.1445621650.1651467172.0260282780.042761887FalseFalse
IN0.0150062920.0856034780.0889482360.0552965830.4495910410.653005349FalseFalse
AST0.3745925020.0578676850.04303492−0.427250122−0.7876034230.430928712FalseFalse
Oli0.4516365340.0323205580.028495137−0.18173637−1.5516033170.120757169FalseFalse
Opc0.9823866980.0486973140.045452903−0.0994697730.7574470020.448782106FalseFalse
Mic0.8544487580.0359235840.0384189930.096888390.5227610510.601140547FalseFalse

EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia.

Table 3.

Differential expression of TOM1 between early-pathology and late-pathology groups

Cell typeIndModel.adj.pvalLate.pathology.meanEarly.pathology.meanIndModel.FCMixedModel.zMixedModel.pDEGs.Ind.ModelDEGs.Ind.Mix.models
EX1.01E-070.094452730.100376788−0.0877612790.5448918650.585827892FalseFalse
IN1.24E-070.0727405170.0644449270.1746923860.7120957370.476405494FalseFalse
AST0.9766879790.0394839770.043085957−0.1259504280.4049414070.685520581FalseFalse
Oli0.287656170.028581490.029365221−0.0390273610.825820970.408905657FalseFalse
Opc0.6291353980.0443605410.044510058−0.0048544220.5019579660.615697089FalseFalse
Mic0.899083770.0346523340.044636471−0.3652704160.1575578250.874805239FalseFalse

EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia.

Differential expression of TOM1 between no-pathology and pathology groups EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia. Differential expression of TOM1 between no-pathology and early-pathology groups EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia. Differential expression of TOM1 between early-pathology and late-pathology groups EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia. In their analysis, Peng and Zhao (4) also describe that TOM1 expression is higher in microglia from patients with AD versus controls. This conclusion seems to be based solely on the IndModel.FC since IndModel.adj.pvals are clearly not significant. Peng and Zhao (4) also do not take into consideration other cell types when discussing TOM1 levels, including inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. TOM1 levels are not significantly altered in these cells; however, when IndModel.FC is used to assess changes in gene expression, it shows reductions in TOM1 levels in most cells in subjects with early and late AD versus controls. By extrapolating this analysis, one could suggest that expression of TOM1 in individual cell types is differentially altered by AD and its overall levels would depend on the sum of individual cellular changes. As the bulk RNAseq data in the single-cell transcriptomic study were not directly accessible, we determined the overall TOM1 levels using the normalized bulk data from the Mayo Clinic Pilot RNAseq study (AMP-AD: syn3157268) (6). The Mayo Clinic study was performed in the temporal cortex of subjects with AD and non-AD controls and quantification of TOM1 expression demonstrated an overall reduction in AD (Fig. 1). Whether changes in RNA levels in individual cell populations or brain regions translate to changes in protein levels still needs further investigation. Considering the important role of TOM1 in regulating endocytic processes that counterbalance proinflammatory responses and β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition (1, 2), more studies are clearly needed to better address the levels and role of TOM1 in AD.
Fig. 1.

Quantification of TOM1 expression in the temporal cortex of AD and non-AD controls. N, non-AD controls; AD, Alzheimer’s disease.

Quantification of TOM1 expression in the temporal cortex of AD and non-AD controls. N, non-AD controls; AD, Alzheimer’s disease.
Table 2.

Differential expression of TOM1 between no-pathology and early-pathology groups

Cell typeIndModel.adj.pvalNo.pathology.meanEarly.pathology.meanIndModel.FCMixedModel.zMixedModel.pDEGs.Ind.ModelDEGs.Ind.Mix.models
EX6.14E-230.1283933380.1468530390.1938027821.801293630.071656611FalseFalse
IN1.59E-060.0833805310.082797952−0.010115485−0.1494995930.881159431FalseFalse
AST0.3932410930.0575243630.043917183−0.389387572−1.0136706540.310739931FalseFalse
Oli0.2817104580.0313536270.027925276−0.167060773−1.7585871310.07864766FalseFalse
Opc0.8352547020.0478578480.044720057−0.0978334980.4419534550.658522888FalseFalse
Mic0.9795827040.0354523660.0421456930.2495033250.5923153960.553639408FalseFalse

EX, excitatory neurons; IN, inhibitory neurons; AST, astrocytes; Oli, oligodendrocytes; Opc, oligodendrocyte precursor cells; Mic, microglia.

  6 in total

1.  Reduction in TOM1 expression exacerbates Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jiajie Peng; Tianyi Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  TOM1 Regulates Neuronal Accumulation of Amyloid-β Oligomers by FcγRIIb2 Variant in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Youngdae Gwon; Tae-In Kam; Seo-Hyun Kim; Sungmin Song; Hyejin Park; Bitna Lim; Haneul Lee; Weontae Lee; Dong-Gyu Jo; Yong-Keun Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hansruedi Mathys; Jose Davila-Velderrain; Zhuyu Peng; Fan Gao; Shahin Mohammadi; Jennie Z Young; Madhvi Menon; Liang He; Fatema Abdurrob; Xueqiao Jiang; Anthony J Martorell; Richard M Ransohoff; Brian P Hafler; David A Bennett; Manolis Kellis; Li-Huei Tsai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Vladimir Yu Kiselev; Tallulah S Andrews; Martin Hemberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Human whole genome genotype and transcriptome data for Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Mariet Allen; Minerva M Carrasquillo; Cory Funk; Benjamin D Heavner; Fanggeng Zou; Curtis S Younkin; Jeremy D Burgess; High-Seng Chai; Julia Crook; James A Eddy; Hongdong Li; Ben Logsdon; Mette A Peters; Kristen K Dang; Xue Wang; Daniel Serie; Chen Wang; Thuy Nguyen; Sarah Lincoln; Kimberly Malphrus; Gina Bisceglio; Ma Li; Todd E Golde; Lara M Mangravite; Yan Asmann; Nathan D Price; Ronald C Petersen; Neill R Graff-Radford; Dennis W Dickson; Steven G Younkin; Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  Amyloid-beta impairs TOM1-mediated IL-1R1 signaling.

Authors:  Alessandra Cadete Martini; Angela Gomez-Arboledas; Stefania Forner; Carlos J Rodriguez-Ortiz; Amanda McQuade; Emma Danhash; Jimmy Phan; Dominic Javonillo; Jordan-Vu Ha; Melanie Tram; Laura Trujillo-Estrada; Celia da Cunha; Rahasson R Ager; Jose C Davila; Masashi Kitazawa; Mathew Blurton-Jones; Antonia Gutierrez; David Baglietto-Vargas; Rodrigo Medeiros; Frank M LaFerla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.