Literature DB >> 32047029

Basic principles of neonatal bubble CPAP: effects on CPAP delivery and imposed work of breathing when altering the original design.

Sonja Baldursdottir1,2, Markus Falk1,3, Snorri Donaldsson1,2, Baldvin Jonsson1,2, Thomas Drevhammar4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The original bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) design has wide-bore tubing and a low-resistance interface. This creates a stable airway pressure that is reflected by the submersion depth of the expiratory tubing. Several systems with alterations to the original bCPAP design are now available. Most of these are aimed for use in low-income and middle-income countries and have not been compared with the original design.
OBJECTIVE: We identified three major alterations to the original bCPAP design: (1) resistance of nasal interface, (2) volume of dead space and (3) diameter of expiratory tubing. Our aim was to study the effect of these alterations on CPAP delivery and work of breathing in a mechanical lung model. Dead space should always be avoided and was not further tested.
METHODS: The effect of nasal interface resistance and expiratory tubing diameter was evaluated with simulated breathing in a mechanical lung model without interface leakage. The main outcome was delivered CPAP and imposed work of breathing.
RESULTS: High-resistance interfaces and narrow expiratory tubing increased the work of breathing. Additionally, narrow expiratory tubing resulted in higher CPAP levels than indicated by the submersion depth.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows the significant effect on CPAP delivery and imposed work of breathing when using high-resistance interfaces and narrow expiratory tubing in bCPAP systems. New systems should include low-resistance interfaces and wide-bore tubing and be compared with the original bCPAP. Referring to all systems that bubble as bCPAP is misleading and potentially hazardous. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intensive care; neonatology; respiratory

Year:  2020        PMID: 32047029     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  3 in total

1.  Nonclinical Bench Performance Testing of a Very Low-Cost Nonelectric Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) and Blenders Device Designed for Newborn Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Patricia S Coffey; Alec Wollen
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Testing positive pressure delivered from commercial and WHO-style pediatric bubble CPAP devices.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ettinger; Nathan Serazin; Richard Nguyen; Jennifer Werdenberg; Minke Huibers; Susan Torrey
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 3.  Respiratory distress syndrome management in resource limited settings-Current evidence and opportunities in 2022.

Authors:  Osayame A Ekhaguere; Ikechukwu R Okonkwo; Maneesh Batra; Anna B Hedstrom
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.569

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.