| Literature DB >> 32046788 |
Mirna Samara Dié Alves1, Raquel Nascimento das Neves1, Ângela Sena-Lopes1, Micaela Domingues2, Angela Maria Casaril2, Natália Vieira Segatto3, Thaís Cristina Mendonça Nogueira4, Marcus Vinicius Nora de Souza4,5, Lucielli Savegnago2, Fabiana Kömmling Seixas3, Tiago Collares3, Sibele Borsuk6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trichomonas vaginalis is the causative agent of trichomoniasis, which is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases worldwide. Trichomoniasis has a high incidence and prevalence and is associated with serious complications such as HIV transmission and acquisition, pelvic inflammatory disease and preterm birth. Although trichomoniasis is treated with oral metronidazole (MTZ), the number of strains resistant to this drug is increasing (2.5-9.6%), leading to treatment failure. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find alternative drugs to combat this disease.Entities:
Keywords: Antiparasitic; Lipid peroxidation; Molecular docking; Trichomonacidal; Trichomoniasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32046788 PMCID: PMC7014680 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-3923-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Chemical structures of PFUR 4 and 4a-k synthesized by the reaction of 2-(H2NNHCO-furan) and aryl aldehydes (EtOH, RCHO, r.t., 1–72 h, 40–97%)
Fig. 2In vitro trichomonacidal activity of PFUR 4 and 4a-k at 100 µM against Trichomonas vaginalis ATCC 30236 isolate, confirmed by the trypan blue (0.4%) assay after 24 h of exposure: Control (untreated trophozoites), 0.6% DMSO (vehicle for solubilization), MTZ (metronidazole at 100 µM). Viability of 100% in control corresponds to 2.6 × 105 trophozoites/ml. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. Different letters show a significant difference at P < 0.05
Fig. 3Anti-Trichomonas vaginalis assay. MIC and IC50 for the antiparasitic activity of PFUR 4a (a) and PFUR 4b (b) against Trichomonas vaginalis ATCC 30236 after exposure to 1.5625, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 µM concentrations for 24 h. Kinetic growth curves of Trichomonas vaginalis ATCC 30236 after 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of treatment with PFUR 4a (c) and PFUR 4b (d) at 6.25 µM. Growth was completely inhibited after 24 h. Control (untreated trophozoites), 0.6% DMSO (vehicle for solubilization), MTZ (metronidazole at 100 µM). Viability of 100% in control corresponds to 2.6 × 105 trophozoites/ml. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. Different letters show a significant difference at P < 0.05
Anti-Trichomonas vaginalis activity and cytoxicity effects of furanyl N-acylhydrazone (PFUR) derivatives 4a and 4b
| Compound | CHO-K1 cells | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | IC50 ± SEa | CC50 | SI | |
| PFUR 4a | 6.25 | 1.69 ± 0.208 | > 12.5 | > 7.4 |
| PFUR 4b | 6.25 | 1.98 ± 0.121 | > 2.5 | > 6.3 |
aStandard error (SE) as calculated by GraphPad Prism 7.03 software
Notes: All results are expressed in μM, except for SI values. Trophozoites and cells were exposed to PFUR 4a and 4b for 24h for all in vitro assays
Fig. 4Lipid peroxidation levels measured through thiobarbituric acid reactive substances assay with malondialdehyde (MDA) as a biomarker, after 24 h of exposure to PFUR 4a and 4b, both at 6.25 µM. Control (untreated trophozoites), DMSO (vehicle for solubilization), MTZ (metronidazole at 100 µM). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments
Fig. 5Representation of 2D projection and predicted binding mode of PFUR 4a with the T. vaginalis enzymes TvPNP (a, b) and TvLDH (c, d). The distance (Å) of the hydrogen bonds between specific residues and PFUR 4a is shown in green
Binding energies and molecular interactions predicted in silico between PFUR 4a, PFUR 4b, and MTZ, and enzymes important to T. vaginalis survival
| Compound | Target enzyme | Binding energy (kcal/mol) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Hydrogen bond residues | Hydrogen bond length (Å) | Non-covalent interactions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFUR 4a | TvPNP | − 6.4 | 4 | GLY92, PHE159, ANS161, ALA167 | 3.22, 3.54, 3.17, 3.23 | THR90, CYS91, THR156, PHE159, GLN163, THR164, LEU166, MET170, VAL178, GLU179, MET180, SER203, ASP204 |
| PFUR 4a | TvLDH | − 5.8 | 8 | ARG97, ARG161, HIS186, THR239 | 2.09, 3.06, 1.95, 2.71, 2.49, 2.93, 2.17, 2.92 | ILE16, SER88, MET89, PRO90, ASN130, LEU157, ALA229 |
| PFUR 4b | TvPNP | − 6.8 | 4 | GLY20, ARG87, GLY89, THR90 | 3.02, 2.80, 3.57, 3.02 | CYS19, ASP21, HIS62, VAL88, GLY89, CYS91, GLY92, THR156, PHE159, GLU179, ILE206 |
| PFUR 4b | TvLDH | − 5.9 | 7 | ARG97, ARG161, HIS186, SER240 | 2.12, 3.02, 2.24, 2.83, 2.54, 3.09, 2.09 | GLY14, GLN15, ILE16, SER88, LEU91, ASN130, LEU157, ALA229, TRP230 |
| PFUR 4b | TvTrxR | − 6.0 | 6 | GLN82, LYS167, SER172, ALA173 | 3.35, 2.98, 3.19, 3.38, 2.87, 3.36 | TYR85, THR86, LYS154, ALA155, TYR157, ASN168, ASP178 |
| PFUR 4b | TvMGL | − 5.7 | 3 | TYR111, ANS158, LYS209 | 3.04, 2.80, 3.27 | SER85, GLY86, MET87, ILE90, ASP184, THR186, SER206, THR208, VAL218 |
| MTZ | TvPNP | − 5.0 | 3 | ASN161, GLN163, ALA167 | 2.89, 3.07, 2.98 | PHE154, THR156, LEU158, PHE159, THR164, LEU166, MET170, VAL178, ILE206 |
| MTZ | TvLDH | − 5.2 | 5 | LEU157, ARG161, HIS186, SER240 | 2.08, 2.49, 2.30, 2.30, 2.34 | ILE16, ILE128, ASN130, LEU154, ALA229, THR239, PRO244 |
| MTZ | TvMGL | − 4.2 | 4 | SER206, LYS209 | 2.99, 3.06, 2.98, 3.27 | SER85, GLY86, MET87, TYR111, THR208, VAL218, VAL337, SER338 |
Abbreviations: MTZ, metronidazole; TvPNP, T. vaginalis purine nucleoside phosphorylase; TvLDH, T. vaginalis lactate dehydrogenase; TvTrxR, T. vaginalis thioredoxin reductase; TvMGL, T. vaginalis methionine gamma-lyase
Fig. 6Representation of 2D projection and predicted binding mode of PFUR 4b with the T. vaginalis enzymes TvPNP (a, b), TvTrxR (c, d), TvLDH (e, f) and TvMGL (g, h). The distance (Å) of the hydrogen bonds between specific residues and PFUR 4b is shown in green
Fig. 7Representation of 2D projection and predicted binding mode of metronidazole (MTZ) with the T. vaginalis enzymes TvPNP (a, b), TvLDH (c, d) and TvMGL (e, f). The distance (Å) of the hydrogen bonds between specific residues and MTZ is shown in green
Fig. 8Cytotoxicity effect of PFUR 4a (a) and PFUR 4b (b) at 1.5625, 3.125, 6.25 and 12.5 µM on CHO-K1 cells through MTT assay after 24 h of exposure; 0.6% DMSO (vehicle for solubilization) and MTZ (metronidazole at 100 µM). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. Different letters show a significant difference between treatments at P < 0.05