| Literature DB >> 32046741 |
Kristina Haslinger1, Kristala L J Prather2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caffeic acid is industrially recognized for its antioxidant activity and therefore its potential to be used as an anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, antidiabetic and antidepressive agent. It is traditionally isolated from lignified plant material under energy-intensive and harsh chemical extraction conditions. However, over the last decade bottom-up biosynthesis approaches in microbial cell factories have been established, that have the potential to allow for a more tailored and sustainable production. One of these approaches has been implemented in Escherichia coli and only requires a two-step conversion of supplemented L-tyrosine by the actions of a tyrosine ammonia lyase and a bacterial Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Although the feeding of intermediates demonstrated the great potential of this combination of heterologous enzymes compared to others, no de novo synthesis of caffeic acid from glucose has been achieved utilizing the bacterial Cytochrome P450 thus far.Entities:
Keywords: Caffeic acid; Cytochrome P450; PUPPET; Recombinant pathway; Tethering
Year: 2020 PMID: 32046741 PMCID: PMC7011507 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01300-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Aromatic amino acid anabolism and recombinant caffeic acid pathway with l-tyrosine as a branchpoint, and TAL and CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 catalyzing the two pathway steps
Fig. 2Titers of p-coumaric acid and caffeic acid produced from glucose without (a) and with (b) L-Tyr supplementation in selected strains (stacked histograms, error bars = standard deviation of biological replicates, n ≥ 3)
List of plasmids used in caffeic acid production strains
| Plasmid name | Backbone | Enzyme encoded in MCSI | Enzyme encoded in MCSII | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR54 | pKVS45 | PdR-Pux operon | n.a. | [ |
| IR64 | pCDFduet | / | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | [ |
| c22 | pRSFduet | 6His-RgTAL | / | This study |
| c25 | pCDFduet | / | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c28 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pux | PCNA1-PdR (opt) | This study |
| c50 | pETduet | 6His-Pux | PdR (opt) | This study |
| c62 | pETduet | 6His-Pux | PuR | This study |
| c63 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pux | PCNA1-(GGGS)2-PuR | This study |
| c71 | pRSFduet | 6His-FjTAL | / | This study |
| c72 | pRSFduet | 6His-SeSam8 | / | This study |
| c84 | pCDFduet | 6His-Pux | 6His-CYP199A2F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c86 | pETduet | 6His-Pdx | PdR (opt) | This study |
| c88 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pdx | PCNA1-(GGGS)2-PdR(opt) | This study |
| c96 | pCDFduet | / | PCNA1-GGS-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c97 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pux | PCNA3-(GGGS)2-PdR (opt) | This study |
| c98 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pux | PCNA3-(GGGS)2-PuR | This study |
| c106 | pETduet | 6His-PCNA2-Pdx | PCNA3-GGS-PdR (opt) | This study |
| c185 | pRSFduet | 6His-FjTAL | Pux | This study |
| Plasmid backbones | ||||
| Backbone | Antibiotic resistance | Copy number | Origin of replication | |
| pKVS45 | carbenicillin | ~ 10 | p15A | |
| pCDFduet | spectinomycin | 20–40 | CloDF13 | |
| pRSFduet | kanamycin | > 100 | RSF1030 | |
| pETduet | carbenicillin | ~ 40 | ColE1 | |
MCSI and II, multiple cloning site (each with its own T7 promoter and terminator); 6His, sequence encoding an N-terminal hexahistidine tag; Pdx, putidaredoxin from P. putida; PdR, putidaredoxin reductase from P. putida; Pux, palustrisredoxin from R. palustris; PuR, palustrisredoxin reductase from R. palustris; RgTAL, Tyrosine ammonia lyase from R. glutinis; FjTAL, Tyrosine ammonia lyase from F. johnsoniae; SeSam8, Tyrosine ammonia lyase from S. espanaensis; PCNA1-3, subunits of S. solfataricus DNA sliding clamp; GGS, sequence encoding glycine–glycine-serine linker; (GGGS)2, sequence encoding tandem repeat of glycine–glycine-glycine-serine linker; (opt), codon optimized for expression in E. coli
List of E. coli MG1655(DE3) strains used in fermentation experiments
| Identifier | Plasmid name | Enzymes expressed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| s01 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| IR54 | PdR, Pux | ||
| c22 | 6His-RgTAL | ||
| s02 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| IR54 | PdR, Pux | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s03 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| IR54 | PdR, Pux | ||
| c72 | SeSam8 | ||
| s04 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c50 | 6His-Pux, PdR | ||
| s05 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c62 | 6His-Pux, PuR | ||
| s06 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c86 | 6His-Pdx, PdR | ||
| s07 | c25 | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c28 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux, PCNA1-PdR | ||
| s08 | c25 | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c63 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux_PCNA1-PuR | ||
| s09 | c25 | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c88 | 6His-PCNA2-Pdx, PCNA1-PdR | ||
| s10 | c96 | PCNA1-GGS-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c97 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux, PCNA3-(GGGS)2-PdR | ||
| s11 | c96 | PCNA1-GGS-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c98 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux, PCNA3-(GGGS)2-PuR | ||
| s12 | c96 | PCNA1-GGS-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c106 | 6His-PCNA2-Pdx, PCNA3-GGS-PdR | ||
| s13 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c50 | 6His-Pux, PdR | ||
| c22 | 6His-RgTAL | ||
| s14 | c25 | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c28 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux, PCNA1-PdR | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s15 | IR64 | CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c62 | 6His-Pux, PuR | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s16 | c25 | PCNA3-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c63 | 6His-PCNA2-Pux, PCNA1-PuR | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s17 | c96 | PCNA1-GGS-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c106 | 6His-PCNA2-Pdx, PCNA3-GGS-PdR | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s18 | c84 | 6His-Pux, 6His-CYP199A2F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c62 | 6His-Pux, PuR | ||
| c71 | 6His-FjTAL | ||
| s19 | IR64 | 6His-CYP199A2 F185L N∆7 | This study |
| c62 | 6His-Pux, PuR | ||
| c185 | 6His-FjTAL, Pux |
6His, N-terminal hexahistidine tag; GGS, glycine–glycine-serine linker; (GGGS)2, tandem repeat of glycine–glycine-glycine-serine linker
Fig. 3The choice of redox partners and tethering strategies for redox partners leads to higher caffeic acid titers from p-coumaric acid (a–c) and from glucose (d). Pictograms of tether design I and tether design II (e). a–c caffeic acid titers from 3 mM p-coumaric acid 72 h p. i.: untethered/free redox partners (a), tether design I analogous to PUPPET [35] (b), tether design II (c). d Stacked histograms of p-coumaric and caffeic acid titers after 72 h of fermentation for select strains expressing the two-step pathway. (Error bars = standard deviation of biological replicates, n ≥ 3; Pictograms of tether designs: CYP cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP199A2 F185L N∆7), Fdx ferredoxin (Pux or Pdx), FdR ferredoxin reductase (PuR or PdR))
Fig. 4Duplication of the pux gene copy number further increases caffeic acid titers. Stacked histograms of p-coumaric and caffeic acid titers after 72 h of fermentation with glucose as the only carbon source for select strains expressing the two-step pathway (a). Titers plotted over time of a 96 h fermentation of s18 (b). (Error bars = standard deviation of biological replicates, n ≥ 3.)