Literature DB >> 32046447

Cervical Augmentation with an Injectable Silk-Based Gel: Biocompatibility in a Rat Model of Pregnancy.

Bouchra Koullali1,2, Yali Zhang1, Ashley Peterson3, Nicole Raia4, David L Kaplan4, Michael D House5,6,7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to study the biocompatibility of an injectable silk gel in the cervix in a rat model of pregnancy. The rationale is to study an injectable gel as an alternate treatment for cervical insufficiency. We further aimed to perform cervical injections via a vaginal route to mimic the clinical procedure of a cervical cerclage. We performed an in vivo study in pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats. Cervical procedures were performed using a customized speculum under general anesthesia. Injections were performed on gestational day 16. The responses to silk gel injections were compared to polyethylene terephthalate suture and saline controls on gestational day 19 and postpartum. The inflammatory response was evaluated by histology, PCR for inflammatory gene expression, and ELISA for protein levels of proinflammatory mediators. Silk gel injections were performed on 13 animals. All animals tolerated the procedure. Silk gel occupied 5% of the stroma after injection. Injected silk gel caused neither preterm birth nor prolonged pregnancy and had no effect on the kits. When comparing inflammatory responses, expression of inflammatory genes and proinflammatory proteins in the silk gel group was intermediate between saline (lowest) and cerclage suture (highest). Injectable silk gel was more inflammatory compared to saline injections but less inflammatory compared to the suture material used for cervical cerclage. This study is an important step toward development of an alternative treatment for cervical insufficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerclage; Cervical insufficiency; Injectable gel; Preterm birth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32046447      PMCID: PMC7255554          DOI: 10.1007/s43032-019-00111-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  22 in total

1.  Highly tunable elastomeric silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Benjamin P Partlow; Craig W Hanna; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Jodie E Moreau; Matthew B Applegate; Kelly A Burke; Benedetto Marelli; Alexander N Mitropoulos; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Trends and Predictors of Cerclage Use in the United States From 2005 to 2012.

Authors:  Alexander M Friedman; Cande V Ananth; Zainab Siddiq; Mary E D'Alton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Injectable silk-based biomaterials for cervical tissue augmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Joseph E Brown; Benjamin P Partlow; Alison M Berman; Michael D House; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin M Myers; Helen Feltovich; Edoardo Mazza; Joy Vink; Michael Bajka; Ronald J Wapner; Timothy J Hall; Michael House
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Biocompatibility of a sonicated silk gel for cervical injection during pregnancy: in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Agatha S Critchfield; Reid Mccabe; Nikolai Klebanov; Lauren Richey; Simona Socrate; Errol R Norwitz; David L Kaplan; Michael House
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kindinger; David A MacIntyre; Yun S Lee; Julian R Marchesi; Ann Smith; Julie A K McDonald; Vasso Terzidou; Joanna R Cook; Christoph Lees; Fidan Israfil-Bayli; Yazmin Faiza; Philip Toozs-Hobson; Mark Slack; Stefano Cacciatore; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson; T G Teoh; Phillip R Bennett
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications.

Authors:  Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Mikkel Z Oestergaard; Doris Chou; Ann-Beth Moller; Rajesh Narwal; Alma Adler; Claudia Vera Garcia; Sarah Rohde; Lale Say; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Jeff M Szychowski; John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Deborah A Wing; Edwin R Guzman
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-14

9.  Pregnancy disorders that lead to delivery before the 28th week of gestation: an epidemiologic approach to classification.

Authors:  T F McElrath; J L Hecht; O Dammann; K Boggess; A Onderdonk; G Markenson; M Harper; E Delpapa; E N Allred; A Leviton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Biodegradation of silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Bochu Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.