Anna Lena Klein1, Markus Lubda2, Paniz Akbarzadeh Taghavi3,4, Jürgen Lademann3, Ingeborg Beckers4, Jörg von Hagen2, Harald Kolmar5, Alexa Patzelt3. 1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology, Berlin, Germany, anna-lena.klein@charite.de. 2. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. 3. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology, Berlin, Germany. 4. Beuth University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The skin represents a drug delivery portal. The establishment of a skin model capable of distinguishing between the follicular and intercellular penetration pathways remains a challenge. The study described herein was aimed at showing the influence of two nail varnishes as closure material and four application techniques to spread the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) on a successful follicular closure without inducing penetration-enhancing effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For all experiments, ex vivo porcine ear skin was used. In study design A, a standard and a solvent-free nail varnish were compared. It was tested whether the different application techniques (spreading with pipette, careful finger massage, 5-Hz finger massage, 5-Hz automatic massage) potentially destroy an intact follicular closure. Laser scanning microscopy imaging was used to measure if the model drug (fluorescein sodium salt) penetrated into the hair follicles. Study design B investigated how the penetration is affected when applying standard nail varnish containing solvents to skin. It was tested if the varnish blocks the API (caffeine) on completely covered areas and if adjacent areas show increased penetration. Furthermore, lateral diffusion of the API was investigated. After 20 h, the skin layers were separated by tape stripping and heat separation. The tissue samples were homogenized. Caffeine was quantified by chromatography. RESULTS: In study design A, the standard nail varnish showed a secure follicular closure, while the solvent-free nail varnish was not able to prevent follicular penetration. Moreover, rapid application techniques were found to destroy an intact follicular closure. Only the two most gentle application techniques kept the follicular closing intact. In study design B, no caffeine was detected in both skin areas that were completely covered. Since no significant difference in caffeine penetration between the two uncovered groups was found, any influence of the applied closure material on adjacent areas was excluded. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrates that a standard nail varnish in combination with a gentle application technique of the API provides a secure follicular closure. The presented study only investigated the closure for the substances caffeine and fluorescein sodium salt. The results might not be transferable to all kinds of APIs.
AIM: The skin represents a drug delivery portal. The establishment of a skin model capable of distinguishing between the follicular and intercellular penetration pathways remains a challenge. The study described herein was aimed at showing the influence of two nail varnishes as closure material and four application techniques to spread the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) on a successful follicular closure without inducing penetration-enhancing effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For all experiments, ex vivo porcine ear skin was used. In study design A, a standard and a solvent-free nail varnish were compared. It was tested whether the different application techniques (spreading with pipette, careful finger massage, 5-Hz finger massage, 5-Hz automatic massage) potentially destroy an intact follicular closure. Laser scanning microscopy imaging was used to measure if the model drug (fluorescein sodium salt) penetrated into the hair follicles. Study design B investigated how the penetration is affected when applying standard nail varnish containing solvents to skin. It was tested if the varnish blocks the API (caffeine) on completely covered areas and if adjacent areas show increased penetration. Furthermore, lateral diffusion of the API was investigated. After 20 h, the skin layers were separated by tape stripping and heat separation. The tissue samples were homogenized. Caffeine was quantified by chromatography. RESULTS: In study design A, the standard nail varnish showed a secure follicular closure, while the solvent-free nail varnish was not able to prevent follicular penetration. Moreover, rapid application techniques were found to destroy an intact follicular closure. Only the two most gentle application techniques kept the follicular closing intact. In study design B, no caffeine was detected in both skin areas that were completely covered. Since no significant difference in caffeine penetration between the two uncovered groups was found, any influence of the applied closure material on adjacent areas was excluded. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrates that a standard nail varnish in combination with a gentle application technique of the API provides a secure follicular closure. The presented study only investigated the closure for the substances caffeine and fluorescein sodium salt. The results might not be transferable to all kinds of APIs.
Authors: Cornelia M Keck; Ayat Abdelkader; Olga Pelikh; Sabrina Wiemann; Vasudha Kaushik; David Specht; Ralph W Eckert; Reem M Alnemari; Henriette Dietrich; Jana Brüßler Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 6.321