Literature DB >> 32045599

Morphological ciliary muscle changes associated with form deprivation-induced myopia.

Andrew D Pucker1, Ashley R Jackson2, Kirk M McHugh3, Donald O Mutti4.   

Abstract

Myopic children have larger ciliary muscles than non-myopic children, suggesting that the ciliary muscle may have an impact on or be affected by refractive error development. The guinea pig represents an attractive model organism for myopia development research. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether form deprivation-induced myopia in one or more strains of guinea pig causes thickening of the ciliary muscle as seen in human myopia. Thirty-nine guinea pigs were bred from in-house progenitors obtained from Cincinnati Children's Hospital (Cincinnati) and the United States Army (Strain 13). At 2-4 days of age the right eyes of animals were exposed to form deprivation for 7 days while the fellow eyes served as controls. Refractive error was determined with retinoscopy while vitreous chamber depth (VCD) and axial length (AL) were determined with A-scan ultrasound. Ciliary muscle characteristics (ciliary muscle length, cross-sectional area, volume, cell number, cell size, and smooth muscle actin concentration) were determined histologically with antibody labeling and analyzed according to whether the animal developed axial myopia (anisometropia > -2.00 D with VCD and/or AL differences > 0.1 mm) or was unresponsive. This analysis method yielded four groups with Group 1 having no induced myopia but with axial elongation (n = 11), Group 2 having myopia without vitreous or axial elongation (n = 8), Group 3 having myopia with either vitreous or axial elongation (n = 11), and Group 4 having myopia with both vitreous and axial elongation (n = 8). There were no post-treatment inter-ocular differences between strains or for the overall group of animals for any ciliary muscle variable; however, a higher response group number in multivariate ordinal regression was related to having a treated compared to fellow eye that had a lower smooth muscle actin concentration (p = 0.006), with a shorter ciliary muscle length (p = 0.042), and a less oblate eye shape (p = 0.010). Guinea pig ciliary muscle length and smooth muscle actin concentration were significantly less in the treated eyes of axially myopic animals suggesting that 7 days of form deprivation induced ciliary muscle cellular atrophy or inhibited ciliary muscle growth. Form deprivation myopia in the guinea pig does not result in the increase in ciliary muscle thickness associated with human juvenile and adult myopia.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciliary muscle; Development; Guinea pigs; Histology; Myopia; Refractive error

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32045599      PMCID: PMC7113096          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.107963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  39 in total

1.  Prediction of Juvenile-Onset Myopia.

Authors:  Karla Zadnik; Loraine T Sinnott; Susan A Cotter; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; John R Hayes; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Region-specific relationships between refractive error and ciliary muscle thickness in children.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Reactive retinal microglia, neuronal survival, and the formation of retinal folds and detachments.

Authors:  Andy J Fischer; Christopher Zelinka; Nima Milani-Nejad
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 7.452

5.  Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results.

Authors:  Padmaja Sankaridurg; Brien Holden; Earl Smith; Thomas Naduvilath; Xiang Chen; Percy Lazon de la Jara; Aldo Martinez; Judy Kwan; Arthur Ho; Kevin Frick; Jian Ge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Frank Thorn; Richard Held
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Pharmacologically stimulated pupil and accommodative changes in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Mariana B Garcia; Vivian Choh; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig.

Authors:  Marcus H C Howlett; Sally A McFadden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Optical control of myopia has come of age: or has it?

Authors:  Thomas Aller; Christine Wildsoet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Multifocal contact lens myopia control.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Katie L Greiner; M Elizabeth McVey; Lisa A Jones-Jordan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  2 in total

1.  Naturally-occurring myopia and loss of cone function in a sheep model of achromatopsia.

Authors:  Maya Ross; Ron Ofri; Itzhak Aizenberg; Mazen Abu-Siam; Oren Pe'er; Dikla Arad; Alexander Rosov; Elisha Gootwine; Hay Dvir; Hen Honig; Alexey Obolensky; Edward Averbukh; Eyal Banin; Liat Gantz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Mutational screening of AGRN, SLC39A5, SCO2, P4HA2, BSG, ZNF644, and CPSF1 in a Chinese cohort of 103 patients with nonsyndromic high myopia.

Authors:  Yi-Han Zheng; Xue-Bi Cai; Lu-Qi Xia; Fang-Yue Zhou; Xin-Ran Wen; De-Fu Chen; Fang Han; Kai-Jing Zhou; Zi-Bing Jin; Wen-Juan Zhuang; Bing Lin
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.367

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.