Literature DB >> 32044437

Exploring linearity of deep neural network trained QSM: QSMnet.

Woojin Jung1, Jaeyeon Yoon1, Sooyeon Ji1, Joon Yul Choi2, Jae Myung Kim3, Yoonho Nam4, Eung Yeop Kim5, Jongho Lee6.   

Abstract

Recently, deep neural network-powered quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), QSMnet, successfully performed ill-conditioned dipole inversion in QSM and generated high-quality susceptibility maps. In this paper, the network, which was trained by healthy volunteer data, is evaluated for hemorrhagic lesions that have substantially higher susceptibility than healthy tissues in order to test "linearity" of QSMnet for susceptibility. The results show that QSMnet underestimates susceptibility in hemorrhagic lesions, revealing degraded linearity of the network for the untrained susceptibility range. To overcome this limitation, a data augmentation method is proposed to generalize the network for a wider range of susceptibility. The newly trained network, which is referred to as QSMnet+, is assessed in computer-simulated lesions with an extended susceptibility range (-1.4 ​ppm to +1.4 ​ppm) and also in twelve hemorrhagic patients. The simulation results demonstrate improved linearity of QSMnet+ over QSMnet (root mean square error of QSMnet+: 0.04 ​ppm vs. QSMnet: 0.36 ​ppm). When applied to patient data, QSMnet+ maps show less noticeable artifacts to those of conventional QSM maps. Moreover, the susceptibility values of QSMnet+ in hemorrhagic lesions are better matched to those of the conventional QSM method than those of QSMnet when analyzed using linear regression (QSMnet+: slope ​= ​1.05, intercept ​= ​-0.03, R2 ​= ​0.93; QSMnet: slope ​= ​0.68, intercept ​= ​0.06, R2 ​= ​0.86), consolidating improved linearity in QSMnet+. This study demonstrates the importance of the trained data range in deep neural network-powered parametric mapping and suggests the data augmentation approach for generalization of network. The new network can be applicable for a wide range of susceptibility quantification.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; MRI; Magnetic susceptibility mapping; Network generalization; Parametric mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32044437     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

Review 1.  Early differentiation of neurodegenerative diseases using the novel QSM technique: what is the biomarker of each disorder?

Authors:  Farzaneh Nikparast; Zohreh Ganji; Hoda Zare
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.264

2.  Brain/MINDS beyond human brain MRI project: A protocol for multi-level harmonization across brain disorders throughout the lifespan.

Authors:  Shinsuke Koike; Saori C Tanaka; Tomohisa Okada; Toshihiko Aso; Ayumu Yamashita; Okito Yamashita; Michiko Asano; Norihide Maikusa; Kentaro Morita; Naohiro Okada; Masaki Fukunaga; Akiko Uematsu; Hiroki Togo; Atsushi Miyazaki; Katsutoshi Murata; Yuta Urushibata; Joonas Autio; Takayuki Ose; Junichiro Yoshimoto; Toshiyuki Araki; Matthew F Glasser; David C Van Essen; Megumi Maruyama; Norihiro Sadato; Mitsuo Kawato; Kiyoto Kasai; Yasumasa Okamoto; Takashi Hanakawa; Takuya Hayashi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures.

Authors:  José P Marques; Jakob Meineke; Carlos Milovic; Berkin Bilgic; Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hedouin; Wietske van der Zwaag; Christian Langkammer; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Learn Less, Infer More: Learning in the Fourier Domain for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Authors:  Junjie He; Lihui Wang; Ying Cao; Rongpin Wang; Yuemin Zhu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Basal Ganglia Iron Content Increases with Glioma Severity Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: A Potential Biomarker of Tumor Severity.

Authors:  Thomas P Reith; Melissa A Prah; Eun-Jung Choi; Jongho Lee; Robert Wujek; Mona Al-Gizawiy; Christopher R Chitambar; Jennifer M Connelly; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 6.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of the cardiovascular system: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Li Huang; Andrew Tyler; Andrea Barison; Nicola Martini; Luigi F Saccaro; Sébastien Roujol; Pier-Giorgio Masci
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 7.  [Brain Iron Imaging in Aging and Cognitive Disorders: MRI Approaches].

Authors:  Jinhee Jang; Junghwa Kang; Yoonho Nam
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-05-25

8.  Method to Minimize the Errors of AI: Quantifying and Exploiting Uncertainty of Deep Learning in Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Joohyun Lee; Dongmyung Shin; Se-Hong Oh; Haejin Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.