Literature DB >> 32044250

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: how did medialized and glenoid-based lateralized style prostheses compare at 10 years?

Justin C Kennon1, Chad Songy1, Douglas Bartels1, Joseph Statz1, Robert H Cofield1, John W Sperling1, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) performed at a single institution using 2 implant designs: a Grammont medialized prosthesis (medialized [M] group) and a Frankle glenoid-based lateralized prosthesis (glenoid-lateralized [GL] group).
METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, 100 consecutive single-institution primary RTSAs were performed by reconstructive shoulder surgeons who were not design consultants, with the aim of obtaining 10-year follow-up: 56 in the M group and 44 in the GL group. Patients were followed up until death, until revision surgery, or for a minimum of 10 years.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 87 had more than 2 years' follow-up (mean, 77 months). A subset analysis of 41 patients with an average of 10.2 years' follow-up showed sustained long-term outcomes. RTSA provided clinical improvements without significant differences between the M and GL groups, except for improved active forward elevation in the M group (144° in M group vs. 115° in GL group, P = .002). Reoperation was required in 6 shoulders (10-year cumulative incidence of 3 [5%] in M group vs. 3 [8%] in GL group) for a total of 16 complications (10-year cumulative incidence of 8 [14%] in M group vs. 8 [20%] in GL group). Notching rates were significantly higher in the M group (77% in M group vs. 47% in GL group, P = .013); differences in severe notching (grade 3 or 4) were clinically relevant but did not reach statistical significance (23% in M group vs. 9% in GL group, P = .22).
CONCLUSION: Primary RTSA using these first 2 prosthesis designs was associated with good outcomes and low reoperation (5%-8%) and complication (14%-20%) rates at 10 years. The M group had higher rates of notching. These results may provide a benchmark for comparison with newer implants, especially considering that these results include the early RTSA implantation learning curve.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse; long term; osteoarthritis; outcomes; prosthesis design; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32044250     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

2.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

3.  Radiographic geometry and clinical glenohumeral range of motion after reverse shoulder athroplasty, a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kaisa Lehtimäki; Jenni Harjula; Joonas Uurinmäki; Juha Kukkonen; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Jari Mokka; Hannu Tiusanen; Ville Äärimaa
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 4.  Comparison of Lateralized Versus Medialized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Cho; Hyo-Jin Lee; Osama R Aldhafian; Yang-Soo Kim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-04

5.  Infraspinatus and deltoid length and patient height: implications for lateralization and distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Spencer R Lindsay; Weston Smith; Jun Kawakami; Ryan Hill; Robert Z Tashjian; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.