Literature DB >> 32043912

Effect of Different Proteinase K Digest Protocols and Deparaffinization Methods on Yield and Integrity of DNA Extracted From Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissue.

Zoe Frazer1, Changyoung Yoo1,2, Manveer Sroya1, Camille Bellora3, Brian L DeWitt3, Ignacio Sanchez3, Geraldine A Thomas1, William Mathieson3.   

Abstract

DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections is often inadequate for sequencing, due to poor yield or degradation. We optimized the proteinase K digest by testing increased volume of enzyme and increased digest length from the manufacturer's protocol using 54 biospecimens, performing the digest in centrifuge tubes. Doubling the quantity of proteinase K resulted in a median increase in yield of 96%. Applying the optimized proteinase K protocol to sections deparaffinized on microscope slides generated a further increase in yield of 41%, but only at >50,000 epithelial tumor cells/section. DNA yield now correlated with (χ2 = 0.84) and could be predicted from the epithelial tumor cell number. DNA integrity was assayed using end point multiplex PCR (amplicons of 100-400 bp visualized on a gel), quantitative PCR (qPCR; Illumina FFPE QC Assay), and nanoelectrophoresis (DNA Integrity Numbers [DINs]). Generally, increases in yield were accompanied by increases in integrity, but sometimes qPCR and DIN results were conflicting. Amplicons of 400 bp were almost universally obtained. The process of optimization enabled us to reduce the percentage of samples that failed published quality control thresholds for determining amenability to whole genome sequencing from 33% to 7%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA Integrity Number; Illumina FFPE QC Assay; genomic screen tape; quality control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043912      PMCID: PMC7045302          DOI: 10.1369/0022155420906234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  18 in total

1.  How Severely Is DNA Quantification Hampered by RNA Co-extraction?

Authors:  Ignacio Sanchez; Matthieu Remm; Sonia Frasquilho; Fay Betsou; William Mathieson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Variant call concordance between two laboratory-developed, solid tumor targeted genomic profiling assays using distinct workflows and sequencing instruments.

Authors:  Ken J Hampel; Francine B de Abreu; Nikoletta Sidiropoulos; Jason D Peterson; Gregory J Tsongalis
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.362

3.  Comparison of eight commercially available kits for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Anna Janecka; Agnieszka Adamczyk; Anna Gasińska
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  A Critical Evaluation of the PAXgene Tissue Fixation System:  Morphology, Immunohistochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Proteomics.

Authors:  William Mathieson; Nathalie Marcon; Laurent Antunes; David A Ashford; Fay Betsou; Sonia G Frasquilho; Olga A Kofanova; Siobhan C McKay; Stephan Pericleous; Colleen Smith; Kristian M Unger; Constanze Zeller; Geraldine A Thomas
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Extracting DNA from FFPE Tissue Biospecimens Using User-Friendly Automated Technology: Is There an Impact on Yield or Quality?

Authors:  William Mathieson; Nafia Guljar; Ignacio Sanchez; Manveer Sroya; Gerry A Thomas
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  A multiplex PCR predictor for aCGH success of FFPE samples.

Authors:  E H van Beers; S A Joosse; M J Ligtenberg; R Fles; F B L Hogervorst; S Verhoef; P M Nederlof
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Comparison of methods for the extraction of DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissues.

Authors:  Burcu Sengüven; Emre Baris; Tulin Oygur; Mehmet Berktas
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Performance comparison of two commercial human whole-exome capture systems on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung adenocarcinoma samples.

Authors:  Silvia Bonfiglio; Irene Vanni; Valeria Rossella; Anna Truini; Dejan Lazarevic; Maria Giovanna Dal Bello; Angela Alama; Marco Mora; Erika Rijavec; Carlo Genova; Davide Cittaro; Francesco Grossi; Simona Coco
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Next-generation sequencing of RNA and DNA isolated from paired fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of human cancer and normal tissue.

Authors:  Jakob Hedegaard; Kasper Thorsen; Mette Katrine Lund; Anne-Mette K Hein; Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit; Søren Vang; Iver Nordentoft; Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder; Mogens Kruhøffer; Henrik Hager; Bjarne Knudsen; Claus Lindbjerg Andersen; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen; Jakob Skou Pedersen; Torben Falck Ørntoft; Lars Dyrskjøt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Whole exome sequencing (WES) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Authors:  Annalisa Astolfi; Milena Urbini; Valentina Indio; Margherita Nannini; Chiara Giusy Genovese; Donatella Santini; Maristella Saponara; Anna Mandrioli; Giorgio Ercolani; Giovanni Brandi; Guido Biasco; Maria A Pantaleo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Why Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biospecimens Must Be Used in Genomic Medicine: An Evidence-based Review and Conclusion.

Authors:  William Mathieson; Geraldine A Thomas
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.