| Literature DB >> 32043741 |
James I Watling1, Victor Arroyo-Rodríguez2, Marion Pfeifer3, Lander Baeten4, Cristina Banks-Leite5, Laura M Cisneros6, Rebecca Fang7, A Caroli Hamel-Leigue8, Thibault Lachat9,10, Inara R Leal11, Luc Lens12, Hugh P Possingham13, Dinarzarde C Raheem14, Danilo B Ribeiro15, Eleanor M Slade16, J Nicolas Urbina-Cardona17, Eric M Wood18, Lenore Fahrig19.
Abstract
Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related to the amount of habitat around the plot than to patch size or isolation; (2) habitat amount better predicts species density than patch size and isolation combined, (3) there is no effect of habitat fragmentation per se on species density and (4) patch size and isolation effects do not become stronger with declining habitat amount. Data on eight taxonomic groups from 35 studies around the world support these predictions. Conserving species density requires minimising habitat loss, irrespective of the configuration of the patches in which that habitat is contained.Entities:
Keywords: Forest loss; habitat amount; patch size; sampling effect
Year: 2020 PMID: 32043741 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Lett ISSN: 1461-023X Impact factor: 9.492