Literature DB >> 3204335

Ultrastructure, morphology and organization of biogenic magnetite from sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka: implications for magnetoreception.

S Mann1, N H Sparks, M M Walker, J L Kirschvink.   

Abstract

Although ferromagnetic material has been detected in the tissues of a variety of animals that are known or suspected to respond to magnetic fields, in only a few cases has the material been identified and its suitability for use in magnetoreception been determined. Using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), we have studied magnetic particles isolated from ethmoid tissue of the sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Low-magnification electron micrographs showed chains containing up to 58 (median = 21-25) electron-dense particles that were held together by intimately attached organic material. The particle size range was 25-60 nm with a mean of 48 nm and a standard deviation of 8.5 nm. Elemental analysis, by energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA), electron diffraction patterns and HRTEM lattice images, showed that many of the particles were structurally well-ordered and crystallographically single-domain magnetite. These results imply that the production of the biomineral is under precise biological control. The crystal morphology was cubo-octahedral with the (111) faces of adjacent crystals lying perpendicular to the chain axis. The magnetic moments of the particles will therefore be aligned along the chain axis and will sum to produce a total moment dependent on the number of particles present in each chain. In the presence of the geomagnetic field, the mean moment for the particles will give a magnetic to thermal energy ratio of about 0.2. The corresponding calculations for individual chains gave two clusters of ratios ranging between 2.7 and 5.3 and between 6.6 and 9.5. The implications of these results in the possible use of the particles in magnetoreception are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3204335     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.140.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  27 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Magnetite biomineralization in the human brain.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; A Kobayashi-Kirschvink; B J Woodford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A magnetic protein biocompass.

Authors:  Siying Qin; Hang Yin; Celi Yang; Yunfeng Dou; Zhongmin Liu; Peng Zhang; He Yu; Yulong Huang; Jing Feng; Junfeng Hao; Jia Hao; Lizong Deng; Xiyun Yan; Xiaoli Dong; Zhongxian Zhao; Taijiao Jiang; Hong-Wei Wang; Shu-Jin Luo; Can Xie
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 4.  Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jeremy Shaw; Alastair Boyd; Michael House; Robert Woodward; Falko Mathes; Gary Cowin; Martin Saunders; Boris Baer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Geomagnetic imprinting: A unifying hypothesis of long-distance natal homing in salmon and sea turtles.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Nathan F Putman; Catherine M F Lohmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bats respond to polarity of a magnetic field.

Authors:  Yinan Wang; Yongxin Pan; Stuart Parsons; Michael Walker; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Measuring spectroscopy and magnetism of extracted and intracellular magnetosomes using soft X-ray ptychography.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhu; Adam P Hitchcock; Dennis A Bazylinski; Peter Denes; John Joseph; Ulysses Lins; Stefano Marchesini; Hung-Wei Shiu; Tolek Tyliszczak; David A Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Avian magnetoreception: elaborate iron mineral containing dendrites in the upper beak seem to be a common feature of birds.

Authors:  Gerald Falkenberg; Gerta Fleissner; Kirsten Schuchardt; Markus Kuehbacher; Peter Thalau; Henrik Mouritsen; Dominik Heyers; Gerd Wellenreuther; Guenther Fleissner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A quantitative assessment of torque-transducer models for magnetoreception.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.