| Literature DB >> 32043018 |
Emanuela S Fioretta1, Valentina Lintas1,2, Anna Mallone1, Sarah E Motta1, Lisa von Boehmer1, Petra E Dijkman1, Nikola Cesarovic3,4, Etem Caliskan5,6, Héctor Rodriguez Cetina Biefer4, Miriam Lipiski3, Mareike Sauer3, Matilde Putti7,8, Henk M Janssen9, Serge H Söntjens9, Anthal I P M Smits7,8, Carlijn V C Bouten7,8, Maximilian Y Emmert1,2,5,6, Simon P Hoerstrup1,2,7.
Abstract
This study showed that bone marrow mononuclear cell pre-seeding had detrimental effects on functionality and in situ remodeling of bioresorbable bisurea-modified polycarbonate (PC-BU)-based tissue-engineered heart valves (TEHVs) used as transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in sheep. We also showed heterogeneous valve and leaflet remodeling, which affects PC-BU TEHV safety, challenging their potential for clinical translation. We suggest that bone marrow mononuclear cell pre-seeding should not be used in combination with PC-BU TEHVs. A better understanding of cell-scaffold interaction and in situ remodeling processes is needed to improve transcatheter valve design and polymer absorption rates for a safe and clinically relevant translation of this approach.Entities:
Keywords: B-GLAP, bone gamma-carboxyglutamate; BMMNC, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BVG, bioresorbable vascular graft; CXCL12, stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF1α); ECM, extracellular matrix; IL, interleukin; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PC-BU, polycarbonate bisurea; SMA, smooth muscle actin; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; TEHV, tissue-engineered heart valve; TGF, transforming growth factor; TVR, transcatheter valve replacement; cardiovascular regenerative medicine; endogenous tissue regeneration; in situ tissue engineering; supramolecular polymer; tissue-engineered heart valve
Year: 2019 PMID: 32043018 PMCID: PMC7000873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.09.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci ISSN: 2452-302X
Figure 1In Vivo Functionality of Transcatheter TEHV as Pulmonary Valve Replacement
(A) Scatter plot (single events; mean ± SD) representing the gene expression profile of bone marrow mononuclear cells (n = 5) before seeding. Values are displayed as dCt and normalized on the average expression levels of the housekeeping genes (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and β-actin). (B) Top and bottom view of the bone marrow mononuclear cell pre-seeded tissue-engineered heart valve (TEHV). (C) Representative image of the crimped valve loaded into the delivery capsule. (D) Movie stills of valve deployment in pulmonary position performed under fluoroscopy. (E) Bottom view of the explanted TEHV after 4 h in vivo. (F) Representative trans-esophageal echocardiography images for BM-TEHV_6 exhibit sufficient early valve functionality with progressive worsening leading to moderate regurgitation at 12 weeks and pre-term animal euthanasia at 18 weeks. (G) Representative transesophageal echocardiography images for TEHV_5 (control valve, as reported previously in Kluin et al. [5]) show sustained functionality at every time point. B-GLAP = bone gamma-carboxyglutamate; BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; CXCL12 = C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12; dCt = difference between the gene cycle threshold and the housekeeping gene cycle threshold; IL = interleukin; MCP = monocyte chemoattractant protein; TGF = transforming growth factor; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 2Macroscopic Appearance and Histological Analyses of Longitudinal Transection of BM-TEHV_6 Explant After 18 Weeks
(A) View of the top, bottom, and longitudinally dissected valve explant. Arrows indicate tissue overgrowth, and triangles point to leaflet fusion at the commissures. (B) Tile scan of the elastica Van Gieson staining shows de novo collagen deposition in particular in the lower wall and hinge regions. A calcified nodule is marked by an asterisk. Little extracellular matrix is present on the leaflet. (C) Details of the remodeling process in the lower wall, hinge, and 2 different leaflet regions (identified by the insets in A) by means of different (immuno-)histological staining. Arrows indicate CD31-positive endothelial cells; “v” indicates vascularization. H&E = hematoxylin and eosin; SMA = smooth muscle actin; Vim = vimentin.
Figure 3Heatmaps Representing the Gene Expression Profile of Pre-Seeded and Nonseeded TEHVs Explanted After 18 or 24 Weeks
The gene expression profile of each leaflet (L1, L2, and L3) of pre-seeded (n = 3) or nonseeded (n = 3) TEHVs is displayed in dCt and normalized on the average expression level of the housekeeping genes (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and β-actin). High expression levels are represented in dark green. The different genes of interest are grouped in accordance with their function in valve remodeling. MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 4Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of BMMNC Pre-Seeded and Nonseeded TEHV Remodeling After 18 and 24 Weeks
Data are presented as color-coded expression of the 3 leaflets (1, 2, and 3) for different valve locations (lower wall, hinge, leaflet base, mid, and tip). BMMNC = bone marrow mononuclear cell; TEHV = tissue-engineered heart valve.
Figure 5Gross Evaluation and Histological Analyses of the 3 Leaflets of TEHV_5 and TEHV_6 Explanted After 24 Weeks
(A) Tile scan of the elastica Van Gieson staining for the 3 leaflets of TEHV_5, showing similar remodeling outcome. Hematoxylin and eosin staining for leaflet one was previously reported in Kluin et al. (5). (B) Tile scan of the elastica Van Gieson staining for the 3 leaflets of TEHV_6, showing differential remodeling ranging from little (leaflet 2) to no (leaflet 1) neo-tissue formation, to thickening of the wall, hinge, and leaflet base regions (leaflet 3).
Figure 6Quantitative Evaluation of Leaflet Thickness
Thickness quantification for each of the 3 valve leaflets (1 to 3) in 4 different locations of the valve: lower wall (black), leaflet base (dark red), leaflet mid-region (green), and leaflet tip (blue). The gray dotted line at 400 μm indicates the average value of scaffold thickness at implantation. The cutoff for statistical significance was considered to be p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Figure 7Quantitative Evaluation of Leaflet Length
Neo-tissue (blue bars) and scaffold (gray bars) leaflet length quantification for each of the 3 valve leaflets. The percentage value indicates leaflet shortening, mainly caused by the in-folding of the leaflet due to the neointimal tissue. The cutoff for statistical significance was considered to be p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).