| Literature DB >> 32042971 |
A Haruna1, I Abdulkadir1, S O Idris1.
Abstract
The studies of advanced materials in environmental remediation and degradation of pollutants is rapidly advancing because of their wide varieties of applications. BiFeO3 (BFO), a perovskite nanomaterial with a rhombohedral R3c space group, is currently receiving tremendous attention in photodegradation of dyes. The photocatalytic activity of BFO nanoparticle is a promising field of research in photocatalysis. BFO nanomaterial is a photocatalyst enhanced by doping because of its reduce bandgap energy (2.0-2.77 eV), multiferroic property, strong photoabsorption and crystal structure. The material has proven to be very useful for the degradation of dyes under visible light irradiation among other photocatalysts. Its exceptional nontoxicity, suitability, low cost and long term excellent stability makes it an efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of effluents from textile and pharmaceutical industries which ended-up in the environment and now a major concern of the modern world. This mini-review attempts to provide some detailed synthetic routes of BFO and BFO related nanomaterials and the notable achievements so far on the effect of doping the material. It also discusses the effect of crystallite size of the material and other photophysical properties and how they influence the photocatalytic process of model organic dye pollutants, to date.Entities:
Keywords: BiFeO3; Doping; Inorganic chemistry; Materials science; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Organic dyes; Photocatalyst; Pollutants
Year: 2020 PMID: 32042971 PMCID: PMC7002831 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1(a) A perovskite unit cell (ABX3), and (b) extended network structure of perovskites linked via the corner-shared octahedral. Reprinted from Refs (Park, 2016; Green et al., 2014).
Figure 2Schematic diagram on the effect of metal ion doping on the energy band gap of BFO nanoparticles.
Effect of concentration and crystallite size on undoped BFO and rare-earth doped nanoparticles.
| Research | BFO-doped | Conc of dopants | Space group | Lattice parameters | Crystallite size (nm) | Energy (eV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (Å) | b (Å) | c (Å) | ||||||
| Ni | 0.01 | 5.586 | 5.586 | 13.883 | 37 | 2.28 | ||
| 0.05 | 5.644 | 5.644 | 14.013 | 14 | 2.29 | |||
| BFO | 5.576 | 5.576 | 13.867 | 20–35 | 2.55 | |||
| BFO | 5.576 | 5.576 | 13.867 | 20–35 | 2.20 | |||
| Impure | 5.589 | 5.589 | 13.894 | 32.86 | 2.20 | |||
| BFO | 5.528 | 5.528 | 13.721 | 28 | - | |||
| BFO | 5.578 | 5.578 | 13.868 | 20–30 | 2.17 | |||
| Sm | 0.01 | 5.577 | 5.577 | 13.862 | 17.2 | 2.15 | ||
| Sm | 0.10 | 5.571 | 5.571 | 13.805 | 20–30 | 2.06 | ||
| Gd | 0.03 | 5.579 | 5.579 | 13.857 | 27.81 | 2.16 | ||
| Gd | 0.05 | 5.571 | 5.571 | 13.830 | 27.71 | 2.10 | ||
| BFO | 5.578 | 5.578 | 13.847 | 30 | 2.02 | |||
| La | 0.05 | 5.586 | 5.586 | 13.771 | 19 | 2.06 | ||
| Y | 0.10 | 5.565 | 5.565 | 13.738 | 20–30 | 2.29 | ||
Effect of synthesis method and crystallite size on the energy band gap of co-doped BFO.
| Study | BFO-doped | Method of synthesis | Conc of dopants | Space group | Lattice parameters | Crystallite size (nm) | Energy (eV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a = b (Å) | c (Å) | |||||||
| Sr | Combustion | 0.20 | 3.954 | 3.954 | 22 | 2.26 | ||
| Ba | Sol-gel | 0.20 | 5.621 | 13.713 | 23 | 1.79 | ||
| Na | Sol-gel | 0.10 | 5.571 | 13.552 | 31 | 2.17 | ||
| K | 0.10 | 5.578 | 13.542 | 28 | 2.15 | |||
Percentage degradation efficiencies of undoped and doped BFO on dyes with effect of some parameters like the time, concentration and the source of light.
| Research | BFO-doped | Dosage of catalyst (g) | Organic dye | Initial conc of dye (mg/L) | Light source | Time (min) | % Degradation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gd, Sm | 0.05 | Methylene Blue | 3.20 | 150 W He lamp | 40 | 95 | |
| Gd | Methylene Blue | 1.00 | Sunlight | 240 | 94 | ||
| Rhodamine B | 5.00 | 500 W Xe lamp | 120 | 94 | |||
| Nd | 0.16 | Rhodamine B | 6.00 | 300 W Xe lamp | 120 | 59 | |
| Y | 0.01 | Rhodamine B | 50.00 | 40 W lamp | 60 | 8 | |
| La | 0.10 | Phenol red | 10.00 | 150 W Xe lamp | 120 | 90 | |
| Dy | 0.05 | Methylene Blue | 1.00 | Sunlight | 240 | 92 | |
| TiO2 | 1:1 | Congo red | - | 500 W Xe lamp | 120 | 70 | |
| Pt | 0.25 | Methyl orange | 5.00 | 300 W Xe lamp | 210 | 70 | |
| Ag | 0.10 | Rhodamine B | 5.00 | 200 W Xe lamp | 180 | 79 | |
| 0.05 | Methyl orange | 20.00 | 450 W Xe lamp | 90 | 100 | ||
| Pb, Sm | 0.30 | Phenol | 5.00 | 300 W Xe lamp | 120 | 87 | |
| Pb | 0.02 | Malachite green | 10.00 | 105 W vis lamp | 240 | 96 | |
| Au | 0.20 | Congo red | 20.00 | 500 W Xe lamp | 120 | 94 | |
| N | 0.35 | Bisphenol A | 30.00 | 300W I/W lamp | 120 | 94 | |
| N | 0.02 | Congo red | 10.00 | 300 W Xe lamp | 180 | 92 |
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of dye on doped BFO photocatalyst.
Effect of pH on the percentage degradation rate of undoped and doped BFO on pollutants.
| Research | BFO-doped | Organic dye | Initial conc of dye (mg/L) | pH | Time (min) | % Degradation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La | Methylene blue | 3.20 | 2 | 50 | 96 | |
| Gd | Methylene blue | 1.00 | 7 | 240 | 70 | |
| Ca | Methylene blue | 0.100 | 7 | 120 | 100 | |
| Methylene blue | 15.00 | 2.5 | 120 | 70 | ||
| Na | Methylene blue | 10.00 | 3 | 100 | 60 | |
| 11 | 90 | 84 | ||||
| K | 3 | 100 | 56 | |||
| 11 | 90 | 85 | ||||
| Sr | Methylene blue | 10.00 | - | 150 | 85 |