| Literature DB >> 32042848 |
Marco Falcone1, Giusy Tiseo1, Alberto Antonelli2, Cesira Giordano3, Vincenzo Di Pilato2, Pietro Bertolucci4, Eva Maria Parisio5, Alessandro Leonildi4, Noemi Aiezza2, Ilaria Baccani2, Enrico Tagliaferri6, Lorenzo Righi7, Silvia Forni8, Spartaco Sani9, Maria Teresa Mechi7, Filippo Pieralli10, Simona Barnini3, Gian Maria Rossolini2,11, Francesco Menichetti1.
Abstract
Limited data about New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) bacteremia are available. Blood isolates from 40 patients with NDM bacteremia were studied for antibiotic susceptibility and whole-genomic sequencing. NDM bacteremia has high 30-day mortality. In most cases, aztreonam-avibactam is active in vitro. Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam may represent a feasible therapeutic option.Entities:
Keywords: New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases; bacteremia; carbapenem-resistant
Year: 2020 PMID: 32042848 PMCID: PMC7003035 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
In Vitro Susceptibilities of 35 NDM-Producing Isolates Collected From Patients With BSI Admitted to 9 Hospitals Across Tuscany in 2018–2019
| MIC, mg/L | Susceptibility Rates, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Species (Isolate No.) and Antimicrobial Agent Tested | Range | S | I | R |
|
| ||||
| Ceftriaxone | >4 | - | - | 100 |
| Ceftazidime | >64 | - | - | 100 |
| Cefepime | >16 | - | - | 100 |
| PIP-TAZ | >128/4 | - | - | 100 |
| Ciprofloxacin | >1 | - | - | 100 |
| Levofloxacin | >8 | - | - | 100 |
| Amikacin | >32 | - | - | 100 |
| Gentamycin | ≤0.5 to >8 | 3.2 | - | 96.8 |
| Meropenem | 4 to 64 | - | 3.2 | 96.8 |
| Ertapenem | 1 to >2 | - | - | 100 |
| TMP-SMX | ≤1/19 to >8/152 | 3.2 | - | 96.8 |
| Tigecycline | ≤0.25 to >4 | 80.6 | - | 19.4 |
| Colistin | ≤0.5 to >8 | 90.3 | - | 9.7 |
| Aztreonam | >32 | - | - | 100 |
| Fosfomycina | 4 to 64 | 80.6 | - | 19.4 |
| CLZ-TAZ | >64/4 | - | - | 100 |
| CAZ-AVI | >32 | - | - | 100 |
| MER-VAB | 4 to >64 | 3.2 | - | 96.8 |
| AZT-AVI | ≤0.25 to 1 | 100 | - | - |
|
| ||||
| Ceftriaxone | >4 | - | - | 100 |
| Ceftazidime | >64 | - | - | 100 |
| Cefepime | >16 | - | - | 100 |
| PIP-TAZ | >128/4 | - | - | 100 |
| Ciprofloxacin | >1 | - | - | 100 |
| Levofloxacin | >8 | - | - | 100 |
| Amikacin | >32 | - | - | 100 |
| Gentamycin | >8 | - | - | 100 |
| Meropenem | 64 to >64 | - | - | 100 |
| Ertapenem | >2 | - | - | 100 |
| TMP-SMX | >8/152 | - | - | 100 |
| Tigecycline | ≤0.25 to 1 | 75 | - | 25 |
| Colistin | ≤0.5 to 1 | 100 | - | - |
| Aztreonam | 2 to 32 | - | 25 | 75 |
| Fosfomycina | ≤8 to 64 | 75 | - | 25 |
| CLZ-TAZ | >64/4 | - | - | 100 |
| CAZ-AVI | >32 | - | - | 100 |
| MER-VAB | 64 to >64 | - | - | 100 |
| AZT-AVI | 2 to 8 | - | 50 | 50 |
Abbreviations: AZT-AVI, aztreonam-avibactam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CLZ-TAZ, ceftolozane-tazobactam; MER-VAB, meropenem-vaborbactam; PIP-TAZ, piperacillin-tazobactam; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
aMIC for fosfomycin determined by agar dilution.
NDM-Producing Enterobacterales BSI: Comparison Between Survivors and Nonsurvivors (Tuscany, Italy, 2018–2019)
| All Patients (n = 40) | Survivors (n = 23) | Nonsurvivors (n = 17) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (IQR), y | 70.5 (55.25–77.75) | 63 (48–76) | 74 (67–82.5) |
|
| Male sex | 28 (70) | 17 (73.9) | 11 (64.7) | .530 |
| Ward of hospitalization | ||||
| Medical wards | 20 (50) | 12 (52.2) | 8 (47.1) | .687 |
| ICU wards | 13 (32.5) | 8 (34.8) | 5 (29.4) | |
| Surgery | 7 (17.5) | 3 (13) | 4 (23.5) | |
| Comorbidities | ||||
| Cardiovascular disease | 20 (50) | 9 (39.1) | 11 (64.7) | .110 |
| Malignancy | 19 (47.5) | 9 (39.1) | 10 (58.8) | .218 |
| COPD | 12 (30) | 5 (21.7) | 7 (41.2) | .185 |
| Diabetes | 12 (30) | 8 (34.8) | 4 (23.5) | .443 |
| Chronic renal diseases | 7 (17.5) | 4 (17.4) | 3 (17.6) | .983 |
| Charlson comorbidity index, median (IQR) | 4 (2–7) | 3 (0–5) | 6 (3–8.5) |
|
| Immunosuppressive therapy,a previous 30 d | 15 (37.5) | 7 (30.4) | 8 (47.1) | .283 |
| Source of infection | ||||
| Unknown | 10 (25) | 3 (13) | 7 (41.2) | .067 |
| Urinary tract | 10 (25) | 7 (30.4) | 3 (17.6) | |
| Intravascular device | 9 (22.5) | 8 (34.8) | 1 (5.9) | |
| ABSSSI | 6 (15) | 3 (13) | 3 (17.6) | |
| Respiratory tract | 3 (7.5) | 2 (8.7) | 1 (5.9) | |
| Intra-abdominal | 2 (5) | 0 | 2 (11.8) | |
| NDM-producing strain rectal colonization | 27 (67.5) | 17 (89.5) | 10 (62.5) | .058 |
| Source control | 20 (50) | 12 (52.2) | 8 (47.1) | .749 |
| SOFA score, median (IQR) | 4 (2–6) | 4 (2–6) | 5 (3–6.5) | .229 |
| Length of hospital stay, median (IQR), d | 23 (13–38) | 26.5 (17.25–41.75) | 19 (10–33) | .187 |
| Septic shock | 13 (32.5) | 7 (30.4) | 6 (35.3) | .746 |
| Antibiotic regimens | ||||
| No in vitro active antibiotic therapy | 14 (35) | 5 (21.7) | 9 (52.9) | .054 |
| CAZ-AVI + ATM | 12 (30) | 10 (43.5) | 2 (11.8) | |
| Colistin-based regimenb | 9 (22.5) | 4 (17.4) | 5 (29.4) | |
| Othersc | 5 (12.5) | 4 (17.4) | 1 (5.9) |
Data are presented as No. (%), unless otherwise indicated. P values < .05 (indicating statistical significance) were reported in bold.
Abbreviations: ABSSSI, acute bacterial skin and skin structures infection; ATM, aztreonam; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range.
aIncluding steroidal and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy.
bColistin was used in combination with meropenem (4 cases), fosfomycin (3 cases), tigecycline (1 case), AZT + piperacillin-tazobactam (1 case).
cOther therapies include: 1 patient treated with fosfomycin + tigecycline + amikacin (death); 1 patient treated with meropenem + tigecycline + fosfomycin; 1 patient treated with fosfomycin alone; 1 patient treated with tigecycline + meropenem; 1 patient treated with tigecycline alone.