| Literature DB >> 32042538 |
Yoshitaka Furuto1, Mariko Kawamura1, Akio Namikawa1, Hiroko Takahashi1, Yuko Shibuya1.
Abstract
The complete remission rate for lupus nephritis (LN) is higher with multitarget therapy (MT) using tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids than with steroid plus cyclophosphamide co-therapy. MT is also considered highly safe and is used to treat refractory LN. During MT, MMF is usually administered at a dose of 1 g/day similar to conventional MT; however, it remains unclear whether this is the optimal dose of MMF for Japanese patients, especially those refractories to conventional MT. We report two consecutive cases of refractory LN with conventional MT, case 1 was a 48-year-old woman with LN III (A) and nephrotic syndrome, and Case 2 was a 20-year-old man with LN IV-S (A), nephrotic syndrome, and acute kidney injury. LN was diagnosed by kidney biopsy. Because both these patients were refractory to conventional MT treatment (MMF at a dose of 1.0 g/day) for more than six months, MMF doses of 2.5 and 1.5-2.0 g/day were used as part of MT for cases 1 and 2, respectively. Increasing the MMF dose in MT to 1.5-2.5 g/day without increasing the steroid dose led to complete remission, without any recurrence, and allowed administration of a lower dose of a steroid such as prednisolone (5.5 ± 1.5 mg/day) 18 months after the MMF dose increase. The mean number of days from the start of the higher MMF dose of 1.5-2.5 g/day in MT to complete remission was 129.5 ± 10.5 days. Moreover, lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, gastrointestinal disturbances, or any infections were not observed as adverse events after increasing the MMF dose in MT. Thus, increasing MMF dose while maintaining the steroid dose in MT may induce complete remission; this will minimize the use of steroids in Japanese patients with refractory LN in conventional MT.Entities:
Keywords: induction therapy; lupus nephritis; multitarget therapy; mycophenolate mofetil; steroids; tacrolimus
Year: 2020 PMID: 32042538 PMCID: PMC6996269 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Laboratory data of the patients on admission
HFP: High-Power Field; TP: Total Protein; UA: Uric Acid; BUN: Blood Urea Nitrogen; Cr: Creatinine; eGFR, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase; CRP: C-reactive Protein; TC: Total Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; C3: Complement 3; C4: complement 4; CH50: complement 50; Ab: antibody; dsDNA: double-stranded DNA; Sm: Smith; RNP: ribonucleoprotein; CL-β2GP: cardiolipin beta 2 glycoprotein.
| Analysis/Test | Case 1 | Case 2 |
| Protein | 3+ | 3+ |
| Occult blood | ± | 3+ |
| Red blood cells (/HPF) | 1–4 | 20–29 |
| Protein/creatinine ratio (g/g Cr) | 8.6 | 2.6 |
| White blood cells (/μL) | 3200 | 2700 |
| Neutrophils | 2100 (66.8%) | 2092 (77.5%) |
| Lymphocytes | 710 (22.5%) | 324 (12.0%) |
| Monocytes | 7.9% | 8.5% |
| Eosinophils | 2.5% | 0% |
| Red blood cells (/μL) | 423 × 104 | 396 × 104 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.8 | 11.3 |
| Hematocrit | 37.8% | 34.5% |
| Platelets (/μL) | 17.8 × 104 | 5.4 × 104 |
| TP (g/dL) | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| UA (mg/dL) | 4.4 | 9.7 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 12.9 | 74.3 |
| Cr (mg/dL) | 0.53 | 2.45 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 95 | 31 |
| AST (U/L) | 18 | 782 |
| ALT (U/L) | 15 | 575 |
| LDH (U/L) | 215 | 614 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.3 | 5.2 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 379 | 238 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 255 | 92 |
| IgG (mg/dL) | 1455 | 1172 |
| C3 (mg/dL) | 52 | 24 |
| C4 (mg/dL) | 22.3 | 2.2 |
| CH50 (U/mL) | 5 | 5 |
| Antinuclear Ab | 1:1,280 | 1:1,280 |
| Anti-dsDNA Ab (IU/mL) | 11.2 (−) | 380 (+) |
| Anti-Sm Ab (U/mL) | 101.6 (+) | (−) |
| Anti-RNP Ab (U/mL) | 169.3 (+) | (−) |
| Anti-CL-β2GP1 Ab | (−) | (−) |
Figure 1Case 1 data.
Time courses of proteinuria and eGFR (upper panel) and PSL, TAC, and MMF dosing (lower panel).
eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; PSL: Prednisolone; TAC: Tacrolimus.
Figure 2Case 2 data.
Time courses of proteinuria and eGFR (upper panel) and PSL, TAC, and MMF dosing (lower panel).
eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; PSL: Prednisolone; TAC: Tacrolimus
Parameters change over 18 months after the MMF dose increase (1.5–2.5 g/day)
eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; PSL: Prednisolone; SLEDAI: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.
| Parameters | No. of months after the MMF dose increment | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 18 | ||
| Proteinuria (mg/g Cr) | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 613 | 630 | 545 | 366 | 156 | 110 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 1600 | 1600 | 1040 | 340 | 110 | 80 | |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 79 | 84 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 92 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 63 | 66 | 74 | 83 | 83 | 79 | |
| Peripheral lymphocyte count (/μL) | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 950 | 1400 | 1080 | 1800 | 1560 | 1320 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 507 | 660 | 580 | 910 | 1210 | 1510 | |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL) | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 675 | 662 | 623 | 693 | 686 | 713 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 346 | 417 | 432 | 510 | 563 | 672 | |
| PSL dose (mg/day) | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 20.0 | 17.5 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | |
| SLEDAI | Case 1 (MMF, 2.5 g/day) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Case 2 (MMF, 1.5 g/day) | 10 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |