Literature DB >> 32042203

Power and Sample Size for Fixed-Effects Inference in Reversible Linear Mixed Models.

Yueh-Yun Chi1, Deborah H Glueck2, Keith E Muller3.   

Abstract

Despite the popularity of the general linear mixed model for data analysis, power and sample size methods and software are not generally available for commonly used test statistics and reference distributions. Statisticians resort to simulations with homegrown and uncertified programs or rough approximations which are misaligned with the data analysis. For a wide range of designs with longitudinal and clustering features, we provide accurate power and sample size approximations for inference about fixed effects in linear models we call reversible. We show that under widely applicable conditions, the general linear mixed-model Wald test has non-central distributions equivalent to well-studied multivariate tests. In turn, exact and approximate power and sample size results for the multivariate Hotelling-Lawley test provide exact and approximate power and sample size results for the mixed-model Wald test. The calculations are easily computed with a free, open-source product that requires only a web browser to use. Commercial software can be used for a smaller range of reversible models. Simple approximations allow accounting for modest amounts of missing data. A real-world example illustrates the methods. Sample size results are presented for a multicenter study on pregnancy. The proposed study, an extension of a funded project, has clustering within clinic. Exchangeability among participants allows averaging across them to remove the clustering structure. The resulting simplified design is a single level longitudinal study. Multivariate methods for power provide an approximate sample size. All proofs and inputs for the example are in the Supplementary Materials (available online).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster design; General Linear Multivariate Model; Longitudinal; MANOVA; Multilevel; Repeated measures

Year:  2018        PMID: 32042203      PMCID: PMC7009022          DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1415972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  21 in total

1.  Effects of covariance model assumptions on hypothesis tests for repeated measurements: analysis of ovarian hormone data and pituitary-pteryomaxillary distance data.

Authors:  T Park; J K Park; C S Davis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.

Authors:  Matthias Siemer; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

3.  Adjusting power for a baseline covariate in linear models.

Authors:  Deborah H Glueck; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Power analyses for longitudinal study designs with missing data.

Authors:  X M Tu; J Zhang; J Kowalski; J Shults; C Feng; W Sun; W Tang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Internal pilots for a class of linear mixed models with Gaussian and compound symmetric data.

Authors:  Matthew J Gurka; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Statistical tests with accurate size and power for balanced linear mixed models.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Lloyd J Edwards; Sean L Simpson; Douglas J Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  POWERLIB: SAS/IML Software for Computing Power in Multivariate Linear Models.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Johnson; Keith E Muller; James C Slaughter; Matthew J Gurka; Matthew J Gribbin; Sean L Simpson
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  A comparison of power analysis methods for evaluating effects of a predictor on slopes in longitudinal designs with missing data.

Authors:  Cuiling Wang; Charles B Hall; Mimi Kim
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model.

Authors:  Lloyd J Edwards; Keith E Muller; Russell D Wolfinger; Bahjat F Qaqish; Oliver Schabenberger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Andrew C Leon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  No relevant differences in conditioned pain modulation effects between parallel and sequential test design. A cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Roland R Reezigt; Sjoerd C Kielstra; Michel W Coppieters; Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  A power approximation for the Kenward and Roger Wald test in the linear mixed model.

Authors:  Sarah M Kreidler; Brandy M Ringham; Keith E Muller; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.