| Literature DB >> 32041349 |
Yu-Jing Chiu1,2,3,4, Ziwei Zhang4, Karolina Dziemidowicz4, Christos-Georgios Nikoletopoulos4, Ukrit Angkawinitwong4, Jiun-Tai Chen1,2,3, Gareth R Williams4.
Abstract
Electrospinning has emerged as a powerful strategy to develop controlled release drug delivery systems but the effects of post-fabrication solvent vapor annealing on drug-loaded electrospun fibers have not been explored to date. In this work, electrospun poly(ԑ-caprolactone) (PCL) fibers loaded with the hydrophobic small-molecule spironolactone (SPL) were explored. Immediately after fabrication, the fibers are smooth and cylindrical. However, during storage the PCL crystallinity in the fibers is observed to increase, demonstrating a lack of stability. When freshly-prepared fibers are annealed with acetone vapor, the amorphous PCL chains recrystallize, resulting in the fiber surfaces becoming wrinkled and yielding shish-kebab like structures. This effect does not arise after the fibers have been aged. SPL is found to be amorphously dispersed in the PCL matrix both immediately after electrospinning and after annealing. In vitro dissolution studies revealed that while the fresh fibers show a rapid burst of SPL release, after annealing more extended release profiles are observed. Both the rate and extent of release can be varied through changing the annealing time. Further, the annealed formulations are shown to be stable upon storage.Entities:
Keywords: annealing; drug delivery system; electrospinning; poly(ԑ-caprolactone); post-treatment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041349 PMCID: PMC7076406 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Chemical structures of PCL and SPL, along with a schematic illustration of the experimental procedures adopted in this work.
Details of the formulations reported in this work. All solutions were dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM) and dimethylformamide (DMF; volume ratio = 3:1).
| Sample Name | Polymer Conc. (% | Drug Loading Conc. (% | Annealing Time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCL-0 | 13 | -- | -- |
| PCL-6 | 13 | -- | 6 |
| PCL-48 | 13 | -- | 48 |
| PCL-72 | 13 | -- | 72 |
| PCL-SPL-0 | 13 | 15 | -- |
| PCL-SPL-6 | 13 | 15 | 6 |
| PCL-SPL-48 | 13 | 15 | 48 |
| PCL-SPL-72 | 13 | 15 | 72 |
a with respect to the polymer concentration.
Figure 2SEM images and diameter distributions for the fresh (a,b) PCL and (c,d) SPL-loaded PCL fibers. (e) FT–IR spectra.
Figure 3(a) Graphical illustration of the solvent vapor annealing process. (b–g) SEM images of (b) PCL-6, (c) PCL-48, (d) PCL-72, (e) PCL-SPL-6, (f) PCL-SPL-48, and (g) PCL-SPL-72.
Figure 4(a) Graphical illustration of the fibers before and after annealing. (b) XRD patterns. (c) DSC curves (exo up). (d) Plot of percentage crystallinity against the annealing time.
Figure 5In vitro SPL release profiles. Data are represented as mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments.
Figure 6(a) Schematic illustration of the transformation process to form shish-kebab structures. (b) XPS spectra of the SPL-loaded fibers.