| Literature DB >> 32041272 |
Kippeum Lee1, Heegu Jin1, Sungwoo Chei1, Hyun-Ji Oh1, Jeong-Yong Lee2, Boo-Yong Lee1.
Abstract
<span class="Disease">Obesity is associated with excess body <span class="Gene">fat accumulation that can cause hyperglycemia and reduce skeletal muscle function and strength, which characterize the development of sarcopenic obesity. In this study, we aimed to determine the mechanism whereby acid-hydrolyzed silk peptide (SP) prevents high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity and whether it regulates glucose uptake and muscle differentiation using in vivo and in vitro approaches. Our findings demonstrate that SP inhibits body mass gain and the expression of adipogenic transcription factors in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). SP also had an anti-diabetic effect in VAT and skeletal muscle because it upregulated glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) and uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) expression. Furthermore, SP reduced ubiquitin proteasome and promoted myoblast determination protein 1 (MyoD)/myogenic factor 4 (myogenin) expression, implying that it may have potential for the treatment of obesity-induced hyperglycemia and obesity-associated sarcopenia.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; muscle differentiation; obesity; sarcopenia; silk peptide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041272 PMCID: PMC7072146 DOI: 10.3390/cells9020377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Effect of silk peptide consumption on the development of high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice. (A) Weekly body mass measurements and (B) body mass gain of mice treated for 6 weeks. (C) Representative photographs of the mice. (D) Effect of silk peptide (SP) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass in chow diet (CD)- and high-fat diet (HFD)-fed groups. Serum (F) total cholesterol and (E) triglyceride concentrations were measured using colorimetric kits. (G) Food intake and (H) water consumption per unit body mass. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c).
Effect of SP treatment on organ weight in HFD-fed mice for 6 weeks.
| Organs | Organ Weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | HFD | HFD + SP50 * | HFD + SP200 * | |
| Visceral white adipose tissue (VAT) | 1.42 ± 0.05 c | 3.74 ± 0.51 a | 3.03 ± 0.57 b | 1.57 ± 0.33 c |
| Subcutaneous white adipose tissue (SAT) | 0.74 ± 0.18 c | 1.67 ± 0.51 a | 1.43 ± 0.44 b | 0.95 ± 0.28 c |
| Brown adipose tissue (BAT) | 0.13 ± 0.03 a | 0.13 ± 0.0.3 a | 0.12 ± 0.04 a | 0.11 ± 0.02 a |
| Liver | 1.59 ± 0.21 a | 1.69 ± 0.15 a | 1.62 ± 0.32 a | 1.46 ± 0.14 a |
| Lung | 0.23 ± 0.03 a | 0.24 ± 0.02 a | 0.22 ± 0.02 a | 0.24 ± 0.02 a |
| Kidney | 0.64 ± 0.08 a | 0.67 ± 0.07 a | 0.63 ± 0.08 a | 0.63 ± 0.04 a |
| Spleen | 0.13 ± 0.02 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 a | 0.13 ± 0.06 a |
* (mg/kg/day), data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c).
Effect of SP treatment on the blood parameter in HFD-fed mice.
| Group | Blood Parameter (mg/dL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD | HFD | HFD + SP50 * | HFD + SP200 * | |
| Creatinine | 0.22 ± 0.04 a | 0.25 ± 0.04 a | 0.22 ± 0.03 a | 0.23 ± 0.02 a |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) | 36.67 ± 7.37 a | 41.33 ± 5.51 a | 35.53 ± 9.07 a | 35.33 ± 3.51 a |
| Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) | 70.33 ± 9.50 a | 76.00 ± 5.20 a | 64.67 ± 12.42 a | 62.67 ± 8.33 a |
* (mg/kg/day), data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b).
Figure 2Effect of silk peptide on blood glucose in high-fat diet-fed mice. (A) Fasting blood glucose was measured and (B) the area under the curve (AUC) over time was calculated. (C) Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) was performed after 6 weeks and (D) its AUC was calculated. (E) HbA1c was measured using a commercial kit. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d).
Figure 3Effect of silk peptide on lipid accumulation in visceral adipose tissue from high-fat diet-fed mice and 3T3-L1 cells. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of VAT from mice treated for 6 weeks. (B) Mean diameter of VAT cells (arbitrary units). (C) The expression of adipogenic factors in VAT was measured by western blotting. (D) Viability of 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes treated with SP for 24 h. (E) Oil red O was used to stain cells after 10 days of differentiation in the presence or absence of SP, and photomicrographs were obtained (400× magnification). (F) Expression levels of proteins involved in adipogenesis in 3T3-L1s. Data are the mean ± SD of six replicates and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d).
Figure 4Effect of silk peptide on insulin resistance in visceral adipose tissue from high-Figure 3. T3- L1 cells. (A) Expression of proteins involved in glucose disposal (p-IRS, IRS, p-AKT, AKT, and GLUT4) in VAT, analyzed by western blotting. (B) Expression levels of proteins involved in insulin sensitivity in 3T3-L1s compared with cells treated with 2 mM metformin (Met). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d > e).
Figure 5Effect of silk peptide on proteins involved in glucose uptake and mitochondrial metabolism in muscle from high-fat diet-fed mice. (A) Expression of proteins involved in glucose uptake (p-AMPK, AMPK, p-IRS, IRS, and GLUT4) was determined by western blotting. (B) Expression of proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis (PGC1α, NRF1, and UCP3) was determined by western blotting. (C) Immunofluorescence images of muscles were captured at 400× magnification. Muscles were fixed with methanol, and then anti-GLUT4 or anti-UCP3 antibodies and DAPI were applied. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c).
Figure 6Effect of silk peptide on proteins mediating muscle differentiation and sarcopenia in HFD-fed mice. (A) Grip strength was measured after 6 weeks of treatment. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of muscle from mice treated for 6 weeks (n = 2). (C) Quantification of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fibers. The CSA of each muscle fiber in each field was measured using the Image J program. (D) Expression levels of proteins involved in muscle differentiation (MyoD and Myogenin) and sarcopenia (Fbx32, MuRF1) were determined using western blotting. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d).
Figure 7Effect of SP on muscle size and strength, and body weight in adult mice. (A) Micro-CT image of hindlimb muscle. (B) Relative hindlimb muscle volumes were quantitated compared with those of 0 week. (C) Latency of the forced swimming test was measured for 30 min. (D) Body weight of the mice after 8 weeks of the experimental period. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to young mice group at 0 week; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared to adult mice group at 0 week.
Figure 8Effect of silk peptide on myoblast differentiation and glucose uptake in C2C12 cells. (A) Viability of C2C12 cells treated with SP for 24 h. (B) Images of morphological change of C2C12 were obtained by an optical microscope (up, 200×). Immunofluorescence for the MYH3 expression of C2C12 in the presence or absence of SP (down, 400×). (C) Fusion index was calculated at the end of differentiation by dividing the number of nuclei within multinucleated myofibers by the total number of nuclei. (D) Expression levels of proteins involved in muscle differentiation (MyoD, Myogenin, and MYH3) were determined using western blotting. (E) Expression levels of mitochondrial proteins and proteins involved in glucose uptake (p-AMPK, PGC1α, UCP3, and GLUT4) analyzed by western blotting. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. Values with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05 (a > b > c > d). Met; 2 mM metformin.