PURPOSE: The systemic inflammatory response is attracting increasing attention as a predictive biomarker for oncological outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. This study is aimed at verifying if the lymphocyte-C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (LCR) could be used as a predictor of oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer (RC) receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We analyzed data for 86 patients with RC who received preoperative CRT followed by total mesorectal excision at our institution. A ratio of 6000 was used as the cut-off value for LCR for further analysis. RESULTS: The post-CRT LCR was significantly lower than the pre-CRT LCR in patients with RC. Although post-CRT LCR status was not significantly correlated with overall survival (OS), low pre-CRT LCR was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS: p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.017) in this population and was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (hazard ratio (HR) 3.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-7.66, p = 0.009; HR 2.83, 95%CI 1.14-7.01, p = 0.025, respectively). Furthermore, low pre-CRT LCR was a stronger indicator of early recurrence (p = 0.001) and poor prognosis (p = 0.025) in RC patients without pathological lymph node metastasis compared with patients with pathological lymph node metastasis, and prognostic potential of pre-CRT LCR was clearly revealed especially RC patients receiving long-course CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of pretreatment LCR status might aid decision-making regarding postoperative treatment strategies in patients with RC receiving CRT followed by potentially curative resection.
PURPOSE: The systemic inflammatory response is attracting increasing attention as a predictive biomarker for oncological outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. This study is aimed at verifying if the lymphocyte-C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (LCR) could be used as a predictor of oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer (RC) receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We analyzed data for 86 patients with RC who received preoperative CRT followed by total mesorectal excision at our institution. A ratio of 6000 was used as the cut-off value for LCR for further analysis. RESULTS: The post-CRT LCR was significantly lower than the pre-CRT LCR in patients with RC. Although post-CRT LCR status was not significantly correlated with overall survival (OS), low pre-CRT LCR was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS: p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.017) in this population and was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (hazard ratio (HR) 3.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-7.66, p = 0.009; HR 2.83, 95%CI 1.14-7.01, p = 0.025, respectively). Furthermore, low pre-CRT LCR was a stronger indicator of early recurrence (p = 0.001) and poor prognosis (p = 0.025) in RCpatients without pathological lymph node metastasis compared with patients with pathological lymph node metastasis, and prognostic potential of pre-CRT LCR was clearly revealed especially RCpatients receiving long-course CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of pretreatment LCR status might aid decision-making regarding postoperative treatment strategies in patients with RC receiving CRT followed by potentially curative resection.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemoradiotherapy; Lymphocyte–C-reactive protein ratio; Rectal cancer
Authors: Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Yoshikawa; M Kusunoki; H Yanagi; M Noda; J I Furuyama; T Yamamura; T Hashimoto-Tamaoki Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Koen C M J Peeters; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm Rutten; Lars Pahlman; Bengt Glimelius; Jan Willem Leer; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 12.969