| Literature DB >> 32040718 |
Francesco Arrigoni1, Federico Bruno2, Camilla Gianneramo2, Pierpaolo Palumbo2, Luigi Zugaro3, Carmine Zoccali4, Antonio Barile2, Carlo Masciocchi2.
Abstract
Interventional radiology is today considered the first-line treatment for osteoid osteoma both in the form of needle-guided technique of ablation (Radiofrequency) and of needleless technique (magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery). The follow-up study of the procedures is mainly clinical, since the disappearance of pain is consistent with the success of the procedure. However, due to the minimally invasive and innovative nature of the approach, interpretation of the follow-up imaging could be ambiguous and misleading. Aim of our review was to define the main findings on the imaging that can best describe the regular evolution of these types of treatment. In particular, four findings were considered: (1) bone marrow oedema; (2) reactive phenomena (perilesional inflammatory reaction for extra-articular lesions or synovial reaction for intra-articular lesions); (3) bone remodelling (disappearance of the nidus and bone healing); (4) ring sign (considered as the granulation tissue around the nidus treated). These findings were evaluated using MRI and CT with a follow-up study that lasted up to 24 months.Entities:
Keywords: Ablation follow-up; Bone ablation; Interventional radiology; MRgFUS; Osteoid osteoma; RFA
Year: 2020 PMID: 32040718 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01134-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Med ISSN: 0033-8362 Impact factor: 3.469