Literature DB >> 32040574

A Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Measurements of Maternal Glucose for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Eimer G O'Malley1, Ciara M E Reynolds1, Ruth O'Kelly2, Anne Killalea2, Sharon R Sheehan1, Michael J Turner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) measurement of glucose is currently recommended only for the monitoring of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This prospective observational study evaluated the use of POC measurements of maternal glucose to diagnose GDM in women being screened selectively with a 1-step 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
METHODS: The strictest preanalytic and analytic international laboratory standards were applied to measure maternal plasma glucose at fasting and at 1 and 2 h post glucose load. The recent International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups diagnostic criteria were used. At the same time, maternal capillary glucose was measured. Because of differences in plasma and capillary glucose measurements, regression analysis of POC capillary glucose results vs laboratory plasma glucose results was conducted. The regression equations for plasma glucose were derived in a derivation cohort (n = 102). These equations were applied in the validation cohort (n = 100). Predicted and actual plasma glucose values were compared.
RESULTS: Of the 202 women screened, 36.6% were nulliparous, 56.4% were obese, and 81.2% were Irish-born. Two thirds had a single risk factor for GDM, and a third had multiple risk factors. Based on the plasma measurements, 53.5% had GDM. As a predictor of GDM, the diagnostic accuracy of POC measurement was 83.0% (95% confidence interval, 74.2-89.8).
CONCLUSIONS: In high-resource settings where measures to inhibit glycolysis are implemented, the use of POC measurements for the diagnosis of GDM is not justified based on this study. In low- and medium-resource settings, where measures to inhibit glycolysis are not achievable, regression analysis using POC measurements may be acceptable compared with plasma samples subject to glycolysis. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational diabetes mellitus; diagnostic accuracy; point- of-care glucose; preanalytical glucose sample handling

Year:  2020        PMID: 32040574     DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvz005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Will Be Flawed until We Can Measure Glucose.

Authors:  David E Bruns; Boyd E Metzger; David B Sacks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Glycemic control and its associated factors among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in a tertiary care Centre, Puducherry, South India.

Authors:  Garima Meena; Jayaseelan Venkatachalam; Palanivel Chinnakali; Jeby J Olickal; Karthiga V Kumar; Sadhana Subramanian; Papa Dasari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-01-30

3.  High Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Rural Tanzania-Diagnosis Mainly Based on Fasting Blood Glucose from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.

Authors:  Louise Groth Grunnet; Line Hjort; Daniel Thomas Minja; Omari Abdul Msemo; Sofie Lykke Møller; Rashmi B Prasad; Leif Groop; John Lusingu; Birgitte Bruun Nielsen; Christentze Schmiegelow; Ib Christian Bygbjerg; Dirk Lund Christensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II.

Authors:  Sofia Nevander; Eva Landberg; Marie Blomberg; Bertil Ekman; Caroline Lilliecreutz
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 5.  The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test-Is It Time for a Change?-A Literature Review with an Emphasis on Pregnancy.

Authors:  Delia Bogdanet; Paula O'Shea; Claire Lyons; Amir Shafat; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.