Literature DB >> 32040158

Comparison of Payment Changes and Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Use of Low-Value Laboratory Tests in the United States and Canada.

James Henderson1,2, Zachary Bouck3,4, Rob Holleman2, Cherry Chu3, Mandi L Klamerus2, Robin Santiago3, R Sacha Bhatia3,5, Eve A Kerr2,6,7.   

Abstract

Importance: Evidence comparing the consequences of Choosing Wisely recommendations across health systems or with the consequences of recommendations plus policy change is lacking.
Objectives: To compare changes in the use of 2 low-value laboratory tests after the release of Choosing Wisely recommendations across 3 health care jurisdictions and changes associated with a related policy change. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was a population-based interrupted time series of adult patients (aged 18-64 years) who had primary care visits between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015, or established hypothyroidism between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2015, across 3 health care delivery jurisdictions: Ontario, Canada; the US Veterans Health Administration; and the US employer-sponsored insurance market. Data analysis was performed from March 21, 2018, to October 31, 2019. Exposures: A December 2010 payment policy change that eliminated reimbursement of vitamin D screening in Ontario, Canada, and the subsequent release of Choosing Wisely recommendations against low-value use of vitamin D tests in February 2013 and triiodothyronine tests in October 2013 in the United States and both tests in October 2014 in Canada. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative marginal effects (RMEs) comparing low-value testing rates after the release of Choosing Wisely recommendations with rates expected based on prerelease trends and the associated change in low-value vitamin D testing after the 2010 payment policy change in Ontario, Canada.
Results: Of 54 223 448 total persons, 28 504 576 (52.6%) were female, with 17 895 458 persons (33.0%) aged 18 to 34 years, 11 101 985 (20.5%) aged 35 to 44 years, and 25 226 005 (46.5%) aged 45 to 64 years. The December 2010 policy eliminating reimbursement for low-value vitamin D screening in Ontario, Canada, was associated with a 92.7% (95% CI, 92.4%-93.0%) relative reduction in such screening. Corresponding Choosing Wisely recommendations were associated with smaller reductions: 4.5% (95% CI, 2.6%-6.3%) in Ontario, 13.8% (95% CI, 11.8%-15.9%) for US Veterans Health Administration, and 14.0% (95% CI, 12.8%-15.2%) for US employer-sponsored insurance. In contrast, low-value use of triiodothyronine testing did not change significantly in Ontario, Canada (RME, 0.3%; 95% CI, -1.4% to 2.0%) or the US Veterans Health Administration (RME, 0.7%; 95% CI, -4.7% to 6.4%) and increased (RME, 3.0%; 95% CI, 1.6%-4.4%) for US employer-sponsored insurance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, marginal reductions in the use of 2 low-value laboratory tests were associated with the release of related Choosing Wisely recommendations but a greater reduction in low-value vitamin D screening was associated with a previous payment policy change implemented in Ontario, Canada. These findings suggest that recommendations alone may be insufficient to significantly reduce use of low-value services and that pairing recommendations with policy changes may be more effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32040158      PMCID: PMC7042826          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  26 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Appropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging in a veteran population: profit motives and professional liability concerns.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Ryan Meral; Scott Ryals; Rebecca J Beyth; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care.

Authors:  R Sacha Bhatia; Wendy Levinson; Samuel Shortt; Ciara Pendrith; Elana Fric-Shamji; Marjon Kallewaard; Wilco Peul; Jeremy Veillard; Adam Elshaug; Ian Forde; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Implementation of an intervention to reduce population-based screening for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christopher Naugler; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Hude Quan; Fiona Clement; Tolulope Sajobi; Roger Thomas; Tanvir C Turin; William Hnydyk; Alex Chin; James Wesenberg
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-01-17

5.  Beyond Nudges - When Improving Health Calls for Greater Assertiveness.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reducing Unnecessary Vitamin D Screening in an Academic Health System: What Works and When.

Authors:  Christopher M Petrilli; James Henderson; Jenna M Keedy; Emily R Dibble; Melissa Y Wei; Julie K Prussack; Grant Greenberg; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Benzodiazepine Use in Older Adults in the United States, Ontario, and Australia from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Jonathan Brett; Donovan T Maust; Zach Bouck; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Graham Mecredy; Eve A Kerr; Sacha Bhatia; Adam G Elshaug; Sallie A Pearson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; William L Schpero; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

Authors:  Alan Rosenberg; Abiy Agiro; Marc Gottlieb; John Barron; Peter Brady; Ying Liu; Cindy Li; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Neuroimaging overuse is more common in Medicare compared with the VA.

Authors:  James F Burke; Eve A Kerr; Ryan J McCammon; Rob Holleman; Kenneth M Langa; Brian C Callaghan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [The problem of medical overuse : Finding a definition and solutions].

Authors:  T Gamstätter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Is Low-value Testing Before Low-risk Hand Surgery Associated With Increased Downstream Healthcare Use and Reimbursements? A National Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica M Welch; Thompson Zhuang; Lauren M Shapiro; Alex H S Harris; Laurence C Baker; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  De-implementing low-value care in endocrinology.

Authors:  Naykky Singh Ospina; Ramzi G Salloum; Spyridoula Maraka; Juan P Brito
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.925

4.  Low-Value Diagnostic Imaging in Children with Medicaid.

Authors:  Jennifer R Marin; Mara A G Hollander; Kristin N Ray; Julie M Donohue; Evan S Cole
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 6.314

5.  Trends in Low-Value Health Service Use and Spending in the US Medicare Fee-for-Service Program, 2014-2018.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Rachel O Reid; Lesley H Baseman; Scot Hickey; Mark Totten; Denis Agniel; A Mark Fendrick; Catherine Sarkisian; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Potentially inappropriate proton-pump inhibitor prescription in the general population: a claims-based retrospective time trend analysis.

Authors:  Leander Muheim; Andri Signorell; Stefan Markun; Corinne Chmiel; Stefan Neuner-Jehle; Eva Blozik; Pascale Ursprung; Thomas Rosemann; Oliver Senn
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  Reducing redundant creatine kinase testing in cardiac injury.

Authors:  Sheharyar Raza; Andre C Amaral; Jeffrey Pang; Fuad Moussa; Dominick Shelton; Lowyl Notario; Heather Harrington; Jeannie L Callum; Paul M Yip
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-12

8.  Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Michelle S Rockwell; Kenan C Michaels; John W Epling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Evaluation of Low-Value Diagnostic Testing for 4 Common Conditions in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Thomas R Radomski; Robert Feldman; Yan Huang; Florentina E Sileanu; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01

10.  Overuse of diagnostic testing in healthcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joris L J M Müskens; Rudolf Bertijn Kool; Simone A van Dulmen; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.