Literature DB >> 32039972

Benchmarking the value of care: Variability in hospital costs for common operations and its association with procedure volume.

Cheryl K Zogg1, Andrew C Bernard, Sameer A Hirji, Joseph P Minei, Kristan L Staudenmayer, Kimberly A Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve health care value (quality/cost) have become a priority in the United States. Although many seek to increase quality by reducing variability in adverse outcomes, less is known about variability in costs. In conjunction with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Healthcare Economics Committee, the objective of this study was to examine the extent of variability in total hospital costs for two common procedures: laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: Nationally weighted data for adults 18 years and older was obtained for patients undergoing each operation in the 2014 and 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Data were aggregated at the hospital-level to attain hospital-specific median index hospital costs in 2019 US dollars and corresponding annual procedure volumes. Cost variation was assessed using caterpillar plots and risk-standardized observed/expected cost ratios. Correlation analysis, variance decomposition, and regression analysis explored costs' association with volume.
RESULTS: In 2016, 1,563 hospitals representing 86,170 LA and 2,276 hospitals representing 230,120 LC met the inclusion criteria. In 2014, the numbers were similar (1,602 and 2,259 hospitals). Compared with a mean of US $10,202, LA median costs ranged from US $2,850 to US $33,381. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy median costs ranged from US $4,406 to US $40,585 with a mean of US $12,567. Differences in cost strongly associated with procedure volume. Volume accounted for 9.9% (LA) and 12.4% (LC) of variation between hospitals, after controlling for the influence of other hospital (8.2% and 5.0%) and patient (6.3% and 3.7%) characteristics and in-hospital complications (0.8% and 0.4%). Counterfactual modeling suggests that were all hospitals to have performed at or below their expected median cost, one would see a national cost savings of greater than US $301.9 million per year (95% confidence interval, US $280.6-325.5 million).
CONCLUSION: Marked variability of median hospital costs for common operations exists. Differences remained consistent across changing coding structures and database years and were strongly associated with volume. Taken together, the findings suggest room for improvement in emergency general surgery and a need to address large discrepancies in an often-overlooked aspect of value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32039972      PMCID: PMC7802807          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  23 in total

1.  A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system.

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The current and future economic state of acute care surgery.

Authors:  Kristan Staudenmayer; Andrew Bernard; Kimberly A Davis; Jay Doucet; Adil Haider; L R Tres Scherer; Joseph P Minei
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery.

Authors:  Joaquim M Havens; Allan B Peetz; Woo S Do; Zara Cooper; Edward Kelly; Reza Askari; Gally Reznor; Ali Salim
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Longer-term Outcomes Among Emergency General Surgery Patients: The Unique Experience of Universally Insured Older Adults.

Authors:  Cheryl K Zogg; Wei Jiang; Taylor D Ottesen; Shahid Shafi; Kevin Schuster; Robert Becher; Kimberly A Davis; Adil H Haider
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The public health burden of emergency general surgery in the United States: A 10-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample--2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Stephen C Gale; Shahid Shafi; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Dena Arumugam; Jessica S Crystal
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients: A statewide analysis of surgeon and hospital volume with outcomes.

Authors:  Ambar Mehta; Linda A Dultz; Bellal Joseph; Joseph K Canner; Kent Stevens; Christian Jones; Elliott R Haut; David T Efron; Joseph V Sakran
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Variations in outcomes of emergency general surgery patients across hospitals: A call to establish emergency general surgery quality improvement program.

Authors:  Gerald O Ogola; Marie L Crandall; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Emergency general surgery: definition and estimated burden of disease.

Authors:  Shahid Shafi; Michel B Aboutanos; Suresh Agarwal; Carlos V R Brown; Marie Crandall; David V Feliciano; Oscar Guillamondegui; Adil Haider; Kenji Inaba; Turner M Osler; Steven Ross; Grace S Rozycki; Gail T Tominaga
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Hospital Volume and Operative Mortality for General Surgery Operations Performed Emergently in Adults.

Authors:  Robert D Becher; Michael P DeWane; Nitin Sukumar; Marilyn J Stolar; Thomas M Gill; Adrian A Maung; Kevin M Schuster; Kimberly A Davis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 10.  Defining burden and severity of disease for emergency general surgery.

Authors:  Preston R Miller
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2017-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.