Marco Savarese1,2, Mridul Johari1,2, Katherine Johnson3, Meharji Arumilli1,2, Annalaura Torella4,5, Ana Töpf3, Anna Rubegni6, Marius Kuhn7, Teresa Giugliano4,5, Dieter Gläser7, Fabiana Fattori8, Rachel Thompson3, Sini Penttilä9, Sara Lehtinen9, Sara Gibertini10, Alessandra Ruggieri10,11, Marina Mora10, Ales Maver12, Borut Peterlin12, Ami Mankodi13, Hanns Lochmüller14,15,16,17, Filippo Maria Santorelli6, Benedikt Schoser18, Lenka Fajkusová19, Volker Straub3, Vincenzo Nigro4,5, Peter Hackman1,2, Bjarne Udd1,2,20,21. 1. Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland. 2. Department of Medical Genetics, Medicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 3. The John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Universitá degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. 5. Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Pozzuoli, Italy. 6. IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy. 7. Genetikum, Neu-Ulm, Germany. 8. Unit for Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. 9. Neuromuscular Research Center, Department of Genetics, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland. 10. Neuromuscular Diseases and Neuroimmunology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy. 11. Department of Molecular and Translation Medicine, Unit of Biology and Genetics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 12. Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 13. Neurogenetics Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, Unites States. 14. Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany. 15. Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG-CRG), Center for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain. 16. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 17. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada. 18. Friedrich-Baur-Institut, Neurologische Klinik Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. 19. Centre of Molecular Biology and Gene Therapy, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. 20. Department of Neurology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland. 21. Neuromuscular Research Center, Tampere University and University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensive genetic screening results in the identification of thousands of rare variants that are difficult to interpret. Because of its sheer size, rare variants in the titin gene (TTN) are detected frequently in any individual. Unambiguous interpretation of molecular findings is almost impossible in many patients with myopathies or cardiomyopathies. OBJECTIVE: To refine the current classification framework for TTN-associated skeletal muscle disorders and standardize the interpretation of TTN variants. METHODS: We used the guidelines issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) to re-analyze TTN genetic findings from our patient cohort. RESULTS: We identified in the classification guidelines three rules that are not applicable to titin-related skeletal muscle disorders; six rules that require disease-/gene-specific adjustments and four rules requiring quantitative thresholds for a proper use. In three cases, the rule strength need to be modified. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest adjustments are made to the guidelines. We provide frequency thresholds to facilitate filtering of candidate causative variants and guidance for the use and interpretation of functional data and co-segregation evidence. We expect that the variant classification framework for TTN-related skeletal muscle disorders will be further improved along with a better understanding of these diseases.
BACKGROUND: Extensive genetic screening results in the identification of thousands of rare variants that are difficult to interpret. Because of its sheer size, rare variants in the titin gene (TTN) are detected frequently in any individual. Unambiguous interpretation of molecular findings is almost impossible in many patients with myopathies or cardiomyopathies. OBJECTIVE: To refine the current classification framework for TTN-associated skeletal muscle disorders and standardize the interpretation of TTN variants. METHODS: We used the guidelines issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) to re-analyze TTN genetic findings from our patient cohort. RESULTS: We identified in the classification guidelines three rules that are not applicable to titin-related skeletal muscle disorders; six rules that require disease-/gene-specific adjustments and four rules requiring quantitative thresholds for a proper use. In three cases, the rule strength need to be modified. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest adjustments are made to the guidelines. We provide frequency thresholds to facilitate filtering of candidate causative variants and guidance for the use and interpretation of functional data and co-segregation evidence. We expect that the variant classification framework for TTN-related skeletal muscle disorders will be further improved along with a better understanding of these diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
Titin; cardiomyopathies; clinical interpretation; data sharing; skeletal muscle disorders
Authors: Marco Savarese; Jaakko Sarparanta; Anna Vihola; Per Harald Jonson; Mridul Johari; Salla Rusanen; Peter Hackman; Bjarne Udd Journal: Acta Myol Date: 2020-12-01