Literature DB >> 32039788

Causes of aberrant non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: A systematic review.

Osamu Samura1, Aikou Okamoto2.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is performed worldwide to detect common chromosomal aneuploidies. The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood for NIPT is highly accurate for the detection of the main fetal trisomies: 21,18, and 13. However, false-positive, false-negative, and non-reportable results can occur, and these can have biological causes. Understanding the causes of unexpected NIPT results is essential to enable clinicians and genetic counselors to counsel patients comprehensively and appropriately, both prior to testing as well as after receiving the test results. The classification of non-reportable results from cfDNA analysis is important in order to provide women with precise information. In addition to technical issues, there are biological reasons for discordant results, which can be either fetal or maternal in origin. Contributing fetal factors include insufficient or absent fetal fraction, fetoplacental mosaicism, and the presence of a vanishing twin. In some pregnant women that test positive for NIPT, multiple chromosome aneuploidy has been reported as a result of suspected malignancy, and cancer has been found. False-positive and false-negative results may be the result of placental biology and not a failure in the actual test platform. Explaining the placental origin of cfDNA provides the patient with a clear view of the abilities and limitations of cfDNA-based prenatal screening.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell free DNA; False negative; False positive; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Non-reportable

Year:  2020        PMID: 32039788     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  12 in total

1.  Clinical utility of expanded NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities and etiology analysis of cytogenetic discrepancies cases.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Wen Liu; Guoping He; Jingjing Xu; Yaqin Peng; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Matthew Cserhati
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-09

3.  The Effect of Elevated Alanine Transaminase on Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Longwei Qiao; Sheng Zhang; Jieyu Jin; Jun Cao; Yuqiong Zhang; Haoyu Tang; Zheng Yu; Jingye Shi; JingPing Yin; Yuting Liang; Xiao Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what can we learn from a meta-analyses on > 750,000 tests?

Authors:  Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies.

Authors:  Elena E Baranova; Olesya V Sagaydak; Alexandra M Galaktionova; Ekaterina S Kuznetsova; Madina T Kaplanova; Maria V Makarova; Maxim S Belenikin; Anton S Olenev; Ekaterina N Songolova
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Sha Liu; Hongqian Liu; Jianlong Liu; Ting Bai; Xiaosha Jing; Tianyu Xia; Cechuan Deng; Yunyun Liu; Jing Cheng; Xiang Wei; Lingling Xing; Yuan Luo; Quanfang Zhou; Qian Zhu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  First Case Report of Maternal Mosaic Tetrasomy 9p Incidentally Detected on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Wendy Shu; Shirley S W Cheng; Shuwen Xue; Lin Wai Chan; Sung Inda Soong; Anita Sik Yau Kan; Sunny Wai Hung Cheung; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.

Authors:  Liying Yang; Wei Ching Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Pilot Screening of Cell-Free mtDNA in NIPT: Quality Control, Variant Calling, and Haplogroup Determination.

Authors:  Alisa Morshneva; Polina Kozyulina; Elena Vashukova; Olga Tarasenko; Natalia Dvoynova; Anastasia Chentsova; Olga Talantova; Alexander Koroteev; Dmitrii Ivanov; Elena Serebryakova; Tatyana Ivashchenko; Aitalina Sukhomyasova; Nadezhda Maksimova; Olesya Bespalova; Igor Kogan; Vladislav Baranov; Andrey Glotov
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Novel method of real-time PCR-based screening for common fetal trisomies.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Seung Mi Lee; Hyun Mee Ryu; Joong Shin Park; Sun Min Kim; Byoung Jae Kim; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Sohee Oh; Chan-Wook Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Ji Hyae Lim
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.