| Literature DB >> 32039727 |
Adegbite A Adesipo1, Sehinde Akinbiola2, Olusegun O Awotoye2, Ayobami T Salami3, Dirk Freese4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Occurrences in land use, human activities and climate change have both direct and indirect influences on the environment. Of interest for this study is mining; a common activity in developing countries such as Nigeria which is endowed with over 34 solid minerals. The gold mining sites in the Southwest region of the country is predominantly by Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM). Though the benefits are known, its induced consequences are enormous. To understand its extent of floristic diversity, identification of functional plants and plant species surviving on the mined sites (despite its characterized mining and alteration level); this study compared the floristic composition of an abandoned mining site (Site 1), an active mining site (Site 2) and an undisturbed vegetation sites (Control) of similar vegetation zone.Entities:
Keywords: Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM); Biodiversity loss; Ecological indicators; Functional plants; Invasive species; Tropics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32039727 PMCID: PMC7008547 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-020-00276-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Biological diversity measurement (alpha and beta diversity), N per site = 4
| Site 1 | Site 2 | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Community composition | |||
| 1A. Species richness (S) ± SE | 41.00 ± 1.0 | 22.00 ± 0.4 | 33.00 ± 1.2 |
| 1B. No. of individuals (N) mean ± SE | 106.00 ± 6.7 | 56.25 ± 1.1 | 91.50 ± 2.6 |
| 2. Diversity | |||
| 2A. Pielous evenness (J) ± SE | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.01 |
| 2B. Shannon (H´loge) ± SE | 3.53 ± 0.02 | 2.93 ± 0.01 | 3.34 ± 0.3 |
| 2C. Simpson (1 − λ) ± SE | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 |
Fig. 1Species composition of the 3 sites by nDMS analysis (with stress value of 0.08). It shows a distinctive separation from the 3 sites: Site 1 (blue); Site 2 (red) and the reference site (green)
Fig. 2Species dominance curve of the 3 studied sites. The species were ranked on the horizontal axis in terms of abundance and on the vertical axis in terms of percentage dominance with each of the site having different slope
Fig. 3Distinctive association of plant type to each of the 3 studied sites. The reference site (green) is associated with fern, tree and shrub, Site 1 (blue) with herb, tuber plants, climber and creeper while the Site 2 (red) has no distinctive association
Species and family compositions of flora on Site 1
| S/n | Name | Family | Habit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Passifloraceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 2 | Passifloraceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 3 | Mimosaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 4 | Mimosaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 5 | Euphorbiaceae | Shrub | Rare | |
| 6 | Euphorbiaceae | Shrub | Abundant | |
| 7 | Commelianaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 8 | Commelianaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 9 | Asteraceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 10 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 11 | Menispermaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 12 | Asteraceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 13 | Menispermaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 14 | Vitaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 15 | Verbenaceae | Climber | Rare | |
| 16 | Verbenaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 17 | Sterculiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 18 | Aracaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 19 | Commelianaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 20 | Leguminosae | Creeper | Very abundant | |
| 21 | Melastomataceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 22 | Moraceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 23 | Moraceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 24 | Moraceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 25 | Leguminosae | Shrub | Rare | |
| 26 | Tiliaceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 27 | Celastraceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 28 | Apocynaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 29 | Urticaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 30 | Papilionaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 31 | Euphorbiaceae | Tuber plant | Abundant | |
| 32 | Asteraceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 33 | Malvaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 34 | Meliaceae | Tree | Rare | |
| 35 | Asclepiadaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 36 | Rubiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 37 | Cucurbitaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 38 | Papilionaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 39 | Musaceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 40 | Musaceae | Shrub | Abundant | |
| 41 | Bignoniaceae | Tree | Rare | |
| 42 | Sapindaceae | Climber | Very abundant | |
| 43 | Urticaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 44 | Pteridaceae | Fern | Rare | |
| 45 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 46 | Caesalpiniaceae | Herb | Rare | |
| 47 | Malvaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 48 | Malvaceae | Creeper | Abundant | |
| 49 | Anacardiaceae | Tree | Rare | |
| 50 | Portulacaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 51 | Sterculiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 52 | Tiliaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 53 | Papilionaceae | Climber | Rare | |
| 54 | Apocynaceae | Tree | Abundant |
Species and family compositions of flora on Site 2
| S/n | Name | Family | Habit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Euphorbiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 2 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 3 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 4 | Solanaceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 5 | Asteraceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 6 | Vitaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 7 | Verbenaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 8 | Commelinaceae | Creeper | Abundant | |
| 9 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 10 | Polypodiaceae | Fern | Very abundant | |
| 11 | Moraceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 12 | Moraceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 13 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 14 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 15 | Asteraceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 16 | Cucurbitaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 17 | Musaceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 18 | Commelinaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 19 | Sapindaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 20 | Rubiaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 21 | Urticaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 22 | Pteridaceae | Fern | Sparse | |
| 23 | Apocynaceae | Tree | Rare | |
| 24 | Malvaceae | Creeper | Abundant | |
| 25 | Asteraceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 26 | Anacardiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 27 | Sterculiaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 28 | Ulmaceae | Tree | Sparse |
Species and family compositions of flora on control site
| S/N | Name | Family | Habit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 2 | Passifloraceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 3 | Passifloraceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 4 | Mimosaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 5 | Mimosaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 6 | Euphorbiaceae | Shrub | Very abundant | |
| 7 | Commelinaceae | Creeper | Very abundant | |
| 8 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 9 | Acanthaceae | Creeper | Abundant | |
| 10 | Poaceae | Grass | Abundant | |
| 11 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 12 | Menispermaceae | Climber | Abundant | |
| 13 | Sterculiaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 14 | Combretaceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 15 | Commelinaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 16 | Amaryllidaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 17 | Polypodiaceae | Fern | Very abundant | |
| 18 | Arecaceae | Tree | Abundant | |
| 19 | Moraceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 20 | Moraceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 21 | Convolvulaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 22 | Icacinaceae | Shrub | Sparse | |
| 23 | Acanthaceae | Herb | Very abundant | |
| 24 | Asteraceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 25 | Meliaceae | Tree | Rare | |
| 26 | Asclepiadaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 27 | Musaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 28 | Sapindaceae | Climber | Sparse | |
| 29 | Rubiaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 30 | Euphorbiaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 31 | Pteridaceae | Fern | Very abundant | |
| 32 | Asteraceae | Herb | Sparse | |
| 33 | Malvaceae | Herb | Abundant | |
| 34 | Malvaceae | Creeper | Abundant | |
| 35 | Malvaceae | Tree | Sparse | |
| 36 | Sterculiaceae | Tree | Very abundant | |
| 37 | Apocynaceae | Tree | Abundant |
Fig. 4Interrelationship between the Flora species on the 3 sites
Fig. 5Scaled map of the study areas
Fig. 6Personally taken pictorial view of the considered sites. a Control site b Mined site 1 and c Mining site 2
Fig. 7Diagramatic representation of the line transect sampling method