Chaoyue Wang1,2,3, Yue Zhang1, Jingwen Du1, István N Huszár2,3, Saifeng Liu4, Yongsheng Chen4,5, Sagar Buch6, Fang Wu1, Yuehong Liu1, Mark Jenkinson2,3, Charlie Chia-Tsong Hsu7, Zhaoyang Fan8, E Mark Haacke4,5, Qi Yang1,8. 1. Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Institute for Biomedical Research, Bingham Farms, Michigan, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 6. Center for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts' Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 7. Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia. 8. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), an unstable component of atherosclerosis, is associated with an increased risk of stroke. PURPOSE: To investigate quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a tool for the evaluation of IPH and calcification in vivo. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Ten healthy volunteers and 15 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MP-RAGE), T1 -weighted sampling perfection with application of optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (T1 -SPACE), T2 -weighted turbo spin-echo (T2 WI), and time-of-flight (TOF) sequences. ASSESSMENT: The vessel wall area of the carotid artery was measured with QSM and compared with T1 -SPACE on healthy volunteers. Four radiologists, blinded to clinical history and patient identity, determined the presence and area of IPH on MP-RAGE and QSM, as well as the area of calcification on T1 -SPACE and QSM. STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients, linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the concordance of area measurements. Cohen's kappa (κ) was analyzed to determine the agreement between IPH detections. The paired t-test was used to compare the group differences. RESULTS: In 423 matched slices, 20.1% (85/423) and 19.6% (83/423) were detected to have IPH on MP-RAGE and QSM, respectively. IPH detection by QSM and MP-RAGE showed good agreement (κ = 0.822, P < 0.001) between the two methods. There was no significant difference in IPH area measurements between QSM and MP-RAGE (7.28 mm2 ± 6.41 vs. 7.16 mm2 ± 5.99, P = 0.575). There was no significant difference in calcification area measurement between QSM and T1 -SPACE (3.51 mm2 ± 1.78 vs. 3.41 mm2 ± 2.02, P = 0.783). DATA CONCLUSION: QSM is a novel imaging tool for the identification of IPH in patients with carotid atherosclerosis and enables differentiation of IPH and calcification. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:534-541.
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), an unstable component of atherosclerosis, is associated with an increased risk of stroke. PURPOSE: To investigate quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a tool for the evaluation of IPH and calcification in vivo. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Ten healthy volunteers and 15 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MP-RAGE), T1 -weighted sampling perfection with application of optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (T1 -SPACE), T2 -weighted turbo spin-echo (T2 WI), and time-of-flight (TOF) sequences. ASSESSMENT: The vessel wall area of the carotid artery was measured with QSM and compared with T1 -SPACE on healthy volunteers. Four radiologists, blinded to clinical history and patient identity, determined the presence and area of IPH on MP-RAGE and QSM, as well as the area of calcification on T1 -SPACE and QSM. STATISTICAL TESTS: Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients, linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the concordance of area measurements. Cohen's kappa (κ) was analyzed to determine the agreement between IPH detections. The paired t-test was used to compare the group differences. RESULTS: In 423 matched slices, 20.1% (85/423) and 19.6% (83/423) were detected to have IPH on MP-RAGE and QSM, respectively. IPH detection by QSM and MP-RAGE showed good agreement (κ = 0.822, P < 0.001) between the two methods. There was no significant difference in IPH area measurements between QSM and MP-RAGE (7.28 mm2 ± 6.41 vs. 7.16 mm2 ± 5.99, P = 0.575). There was no significant difference in calcification area measurement between QSM and T1 -SPACE (3.51 mm2 ± 1.78 vs. 3.41 mm2 ± 2.02, P = 0.783). DATA CONCLUSION: QSM is a novel imaging tool for the identification of IPH in patients with carotid atherosclerosis and enables differentiation of IPH and calcification. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:534-541.
Authors: Alberto Aimo; Li Huang; Andrew Tyler; Andrea Barison; Nicola Martini; Luigi F Saccaro; Sébastien Roujol; Pier-Giorgio Masci Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: My Truong; Claes Håkansson; Makda HaileMichael; Jonas Svensson; Jimmy Lätt; Karin Markenroth Bloch; Roger Siemund; Isabel Gonçalves; Johan Wassélius Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 1.930