Literature DB >> 32038051

A data-driven framework for sparsity-enhanced surrogates with arbitrary mutually dependent randomness.

Huan Lei1, Jing Li1, Peiyuan Gao1, Panagiotis Stinis1,2, Nathan A Baker1,3.   

Abstract

The challenge of quantifying uncertainty propagation in real-world systems is rooted in the high-dimensionality of the stochastic input and the frequent lack of explicit knowledge of its probability distribution. Traditional approaches show limitations for such problems, especially when the size of the training data is limited. To address these difficulties, we have developed a general framework of constructing surrogate models on spaces of stochastic input with arbitrary probability measure irrespective of the mutual dependencies between individual components of the random inputs and the analytical form. The present Data-driven Sparsity-enhancing Rotation for Arbitrary Randomness (DSRAR) framework includes a data-driven construction of multivariate polynomial basis for arbitrary mutually dependent probability measures and a sparsity enhancement rotation procedure. This sparsity-enhancing rotation method was initially proposed in our previous work [1] for Gaussian density distributions, which may not be feasible for non-Gaussian distributions due to the loss of orthogonality after the rotation. To remedy such difficulties, we developed a new data-driven approach to construct orthonormal polynomials for arbitrary mutually dependent randomness, ensuring the constructed basis maintains the orthogonality/near-orthogonality with respect to the density of the rotated random vector, where directly applying the regular polynomial chaos including arbitrary polynomial chaos (aPC) [2] shows limitations due to the assumption of the mutual independence between the components of the random inputs. The developed DSRAR framework leads to accurate recovery, with only limited training data, of a sparse representation of the target functions. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated in challenging problems such as partial differential equations and realistic molecular systems within high-dimensional (O(10)) conformational spaces where the underlying density is implicitly represented by a large collection of sample data, as well as systems with explicitly given non-Gaussian probabilistic measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arbitrary randomness; compressed sensing; data-driven; mutual dependence; sparsity enhancement; uncertainty quantification

Year:  2019        PMID: 32038051      PMCID: PMC7007047          DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng        ISSN: 0045-7825            Impact factor:   6.756


  11 in total

1.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model.

Authors:  A R Atilgan; S R Durell; R L Jernigan; M C Demirel; O Keskin; I Bahar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Single-sweep methods for free energy calculations.

Authors:  Luca Maragliano; Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G Thomas; Michael J Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Statistical Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Molecular Modeling.

Authors:  Muhibur Rasheed; Nathan Clement; Abhishek Bhowmick; Chandrajit Bajaj
Journal:  ACM BCB       Date:  2016-10

7.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin.

Authors:  A Shrake; J A Rupley
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1973-09-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jurrus; Dave Engel; Keith Star; Kyle Monson; Juan Brandi; Lisa E Felberg; David H Brookes; Leighton Wilson; Jiahui Chen; Karina Liles; Minju Chun; Peter Li; David W Gohara; Todd Dolinsky; Robert Konecny; David R Koes; Jens Erik Nielsen; Teresa Head-Gordon; Weihua Geng; Robert Krasny; Guo-Wei Wei; Michael J Holst; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  CONSTRUCTING SURROGATE MODELS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS WITH ENHANCED SPARSITY: QUANTIFYING THE INFLUENCE OF CONFORMATIONAL UNCERTAINTY IN BIOMOLECULAR SOLVATION.

Authors:  H Lei; X Yang; B Zheng; G Lin; N A Baker
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Viral Capsid Assembly: A Quantified Uncertainty Approach.

Authors:  Nathan Clement; Muhibur Rasheed; Chandrajit Lal Bajaj
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Data-driven molecular modeling with the generalized Langevin equation.

Authors:  Francesca Grogan; Huan Lei; Xiantao Li; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.