Literature DB >> 32037900

Bioorganometallic derivatives of 4-hydrazino-benzenesulphonamide as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: synthesis, characterisation and biological evaluation.

Jeremie Brichet1, Rodrigo Arancibia1, Emanuela Berrino2, Claudiu T Supuran2.   

Abstract

A series of bio-organometallic-hydrazones of the general formula [{(η5-C5H4)-C(R)=N-N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]MLn(MLn = Re(CO)3, Mn(CO)3, FeCp; R=H, CH3) were prepared by reaction of formyl/acetyl organometallic precursors with 4-hydrazino-benzenesulphonamide. All compounds were characterized by conventional spectroscopic techniques (infra-red, 1H and 13C NMR, mass spectrometry and elemental analysis). Biological evaluation as carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) inhibitors agents was carried out using four human/h) isoforms, hCA I, II, IX and XII. The cytosolic isoforms hCA I and II were effectively inhibited by almost all derivatives with inhibition constants of 1.7-22.4 nM. Similar effects were observed for the tumour-associated transmembrane isoform hCA XII (KIs of 1.9-24.4 nM). hCA IX was less sensitive to inhibition with these compounds. The presence of bio-organometallic or metallo-carbonyl moieties in the molecules of these CAIs makes them amenable for interesting pharmacologic applications, for example for compounds with CO donating properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioorganometallic-hydrazones; carbonic anhydrase; inhibitors; sulphanilamide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32037900      PMCID: PMC7034112          DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1724995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem        ISSN: 1475-6366            Impact factor:   5.051


Introduction

The carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) constitute a superfamily of enzymes in all living organism, their essential role being that of catalysing the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate and protons. In this way, from two neutral molecules (carbon dioxide and water), a weak base (bicarbonate) and a strong acid (H+ ions) are generated with a huge efficacy. This is actually the main mechanism used by most living organism for pH regulation. CAs are second only to superoxide dismutase for their catalytic efficiency, with some members of the superfamily showing kcat/KM values close to the limit of the diffusion-controlled processes, in the range of 108 M−1 × s−1. The crucial role played by the above mentioned reaction in organisms all over the phylogenetic tree explains why at least eight CA genetic families are known to date: the α-, β-, γ-, δ-, ζ-, η-, θ- and ι-CA classes. All of them are metalloenzymes and for a long period it has been considered that zinc is the essential metal ion in all CAs. However, recent studies demonstrated that the γ-CAs are probably Fe(II) enzymes, the ζ-CAs are Cd(II) enzymes and the ι-CAs Mn(II) proteins. However, in all of them, a divalent metal hydroxide is the nucleophilic species converting the substrate CO2 to bicarbonate in a ping pong type of mechanism. In most CAs, the rate determining step of the catalytic cycle is the proton transfer reaction from a water molecule coordinated to the metal ion to the reaction medium with generation of the nucleophilic enzyme species. In α-CAs, this step is generally assisted by a His residue situated in the middle part of the active site, named proton shuttling residue, whereas for other CA genetic families the nature and positioning of the proton shuttle residue is less well understood. Inhibition of these enzymes with various classes of CA inhibitors (CAIs) has an extended range of pharmacologic applications, starting with diuretics and antiglaucoma agents, to antiepileptics, antiobesity, or antitumor drugs and ending with anti-neuropathic pain anti-ischemia and anti-arthritis drugs. This is only possible because different hCA isoforms of the 15 known to date are involved in very diverse pathologies. There are currently 5 CA inhibition mechanisms, but detailed structural data is available only for the first four of them,. These are (i) zinc binders; (ii) inhibitors which anchor to the zinc coordinated water/hydroxide ion; (iii) inhibitors which occlude the entrance to the active site; (iv) inhibitors which bind out of the active site, and (v) compounds with unknown inhibition mechanism,. However, many of the first- and second-generation inhibitors do not show significant isoform selectivity and this is the main reason why such inhibitors used as drugs show a considerable number of side effects,,. For this reason, the drug design of novel types of CAIs is constantly being pursued by many research groups. Here, we report bio-organometallic-hydrazones of the general formula [{(η5-C5H4)-C(R)=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]MLn(MLn = Re(CO)3, Mn(CO)3, FeCp; R=H, CH3) which were designed in order to obtain organometallic compounds with CA inhibitory properties.

Experimental

Materials

All manipulations were conducted under an N2 atmosphere using Schlenk techniques. The compounds (η5-C5H4CHO)Re(CO)3, (η5-C5H4COCH3)Re(CO)3, (η5-C5H4CHO)Mn(CO)3 and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide were prepared according to published procedures. Ferrocene carboxaldehyde (98%), acetyl ferrocene (95%), acetylcymantrene (98%) and sulphanilamide (99%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Chicago, IL) and used without additional purification. Solvents such as CH2Cl2, hexane, acetone, EtOH, DMSO and THF were obtained commercially and purified using standard methods. Infra-red spectra were recorded in solid state (KBr pellet) on a Jasco FT-IR 4600 spectrophotometer. 1H NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker spectrometer model ASCEND TM 400 MHz. All NMR spectra are reported in parts per million (ppm, δ) relative to tetramethylsilane (Me4Si), with the residual solvent proton resonances used as internal standards. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hertz (Hz), and integrations are reported as number of protons. The following abbreviations were used to describe the peak patterns: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet and m = multiplet. Mass spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu model QP5050A GC-MS at the Laboratorio de Servicios Analíticos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Elemental analyses were measured on a Perkin Elmer CHN Analyser 2400.

Synthesis of organometallic-hydrazones [{(η5-C5H4)-C(H)=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]MLn(1a, 2a, 3a)

To a stirred suspension of 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (1 eq.) in water (12 ml) and three drops of HCl 32%, the formyl-organometallic precursor (1 eq.) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 18 h at room temperature. The precipitate obtainedwas washed with water (2 × 10 ml), diethyl ether (2 × 10 ml) and dried in vacuum for 2 h. The hydrazone derivatives (1a, 2a, 3a) were recrystallized from acetone/hexane (1:5) at −18 °C.

[{(η5-C5H4)-CH=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]re(CO)3 (1a)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4CHO)Re(CO)3 (91 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (47 mg, 0.25 mmol). Brown-yellow solid, yield 48% (64 mg, 0.12 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3373–3262 (νNH/NH2); 2022 (νRe-CO); 1922 (νRe-CO); 1590 (νC=N); 1323 (νS-O); 1152 (νS-O). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 5.65 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 6.10 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 6.32 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.69 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.72 (s, 1H, CH=N); 9.89 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ 83.6 (C5H4); 84.9 (C5H4); 102.6 (C5H4ipso); 111.6 (C6H4); 127.8 (C6H4); 131.4 (CH=N); 134.4 (C6H4); 147.7 (C6H4); 194.4 (Re-CO). Mass spectrum (based on 187Re) (m/z): 533 [M+]; 449 [M+ – 3CO]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C15H12N3O5SRe: C, 33.83; H, 2.27 and N, 7.89; found: C, 33.63; H, 2.27 and N, 7.78.

[{(η5-C5H4)-CH=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]Mn(CO)3 (2a)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4CHO)Mn(CO)3 (58 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (47 mg, 0.25 mmol). Brown solid, yield 52% (52 mg, 0.13 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3365–3250 (νNH/NH2); 2020 (νMn-CO); 1931 (νMn-CO); 1597 (νC=N); 1325 (νS-O); 1147 (νS-O). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 5.05 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 5.50 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 6.31 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.64 (s, 1H, CH=N); 7.74 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 9.90 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ 82.5(C5H4); 83.0 (C5H4); 98.3 (C5H4ipso); 111.6 (C6H4); 127.8 (C6H4); 132.5 (CH=N); 134.4 (C6H4); 148.2 (C6H4); Mn–CO (not observed). Mass spectrum (m/z): 401 [M+]; 317 [M+ – 3CO]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C15H12N3O5SMn: C, 44.90; H, 3.01 and N, 10.47; found: C, 44.09; H, 3.27 and N, 10.66.

[{(η5-C5H4)-CH=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]FeCp (3a)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4CHO)FeCp (54 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (47 mg, 0.25 mmol). Red solid, yield 56% (53 mg, 0.14 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3407–3302 (νNH/NH2); 1603 (νC=N); 1325 (νS-O); 1153 (νS-O). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 4.17 (s, 5H, C5H5); 4.34 (st, 2H, C5H4); 4.62 (st, 2H, C5H4); 6.28 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.70 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.80 (s, 1H, CH=N); 9.56 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ 66.9 (C5H4); 68.9 (C5H5); 69.4 (C5H4); 80.9 (C5H4ipso); 111.0 (C6H4); 127.8 (C6H4); 133.1 (C6H4); 139.7 (CH=N); 148.6 (C6H4). Mass spectrum (m/z): 383 [M+]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C17H17N3O2SFe: C, 53.28; H, 4.47 and N, 10.96; found: C, 53.55; H, 4.36 and N, 10.82.

Synthesis of organometallic-hydrazones [{(η5-C5H4)-C(CH3)=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]MLn(1b, 2b, 3b)

4-Hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (1 eq.) was charged in a two neck round bottomed flask with dried ethanol (10 ml) and a magnetic stir bar. The solution was refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere to obtain a clear solution. To the reaction mixture, acetyl-organometallic precursor (1 eq.) and four drops of HCl were added under stirring condition and the reaction was refluxed for 6 h. After this time, the reaction mixture was filtered and the precipitate was washed with cold hexane (3 × 10 ml) and dried under vacuum for 2 h. The solid obtained was purified using slow diffusion crystallization from THF/hexane (1:5) at −18 °C.

[{(η5-C5H4)-C(CH3)=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]re(CO)3 (1b)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4COCH3)Re(CO)3 (60 mg, 0.16 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (30 mg, 0.16 mmol). Brown solid, yield 50% (43 mg, 0.08 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3374–3256 (νNH/NH2); 2025 (νRe-CO); 1900 (νRe-CO); 1560 (νC=N); 1328 (νS-O); 1155 (νS-O).1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 2.02 (s, 3H, CH3); 5.74 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 6.31 (t, 2H, J = 2.0 Hz, C5H4); 6.43 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 8.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 9.10 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ 21.4 (CH3); 85.9 (C5H4); 86.3 (C5H4); 103.6 (C5H4ipso); 128.9 (C6H4); 130.8 (C6H4); 138.4 (C6H4); 140.3 (C=N); 147.8 (C6H4); 194.9 (Re-CO). Mass spectrum (based on 187Re) (m/z): 547 [M+]; 463 [M+ – 3CO]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C16H14N3O5SRe: C, 35.16; H, 2.58 and N, 7.69; found: C, 35.26; H, 2.60 and N, 7.68.

[{(η5-C5H4)-C(CH3)=N–N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]Mn(CO)3 (2b)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4COCH3)Mn(CO)3 (62 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (47 mg, 0.25 mmol). Brown solid, yield 48% (50 mg, 0.12 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3388–3255 (νNH/NH2); 2020 (νMn-CO); 1921 (νMn-CO); 1597 (νC=N); 1326 (νS-O); 1154 (νS-O). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 2.10 (s, 3H, CH3); 4.92 (s, 2H, C5H4); 5.43 (t, 2H, C5H4); 6.90 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 8.16 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 9.15 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ21.4 (CH3); 83.0 (C5H4); 84.1 (C5H4); 99.3 (C5H4ipso); 128.0 (C6H4); 130.0 (C6H4); 136.5 (C6H4); 141.4(C=N); 148.2 (C6H4); Mn–CO (not observed). Mass spectrum (m/z): 415 [M+]; 331 [M+ – 3CO]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C16H14N3O5SMn: C, 46.27; H, 3.40 and N, 10.12; found: C, 45.99; H, 3.39 and N, 10.09.

[{(η5-C5H4)-C(CH3)=N-N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]FeCp (3b)

This compound was prepared according to the general procedure described above, using in this case: (η5-C5H4COCH3)FeCp (57 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 4-hydrazinyl-benzenesulphonamide (47 mg, 0.25 mmol). Red solid, yield 56% (56 mg, 0.14 mmol). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3330–3202 (νNH/NH2); 1599 (νC=N); 1330 (νS-O); 1158 (νS-O). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 2.11 (s, 3H, CH3); 3.99 (s, 5H, C5H5); 4.30 (s, 2H, C5H4); 4.82 (s, 2H, C5H4); 6.76 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.43 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, C6H4); 8.77 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6): δ20.6 (CH3); 67.5 (C5H4); 68.9 (C5H5); 69.9 (C5H4); 80.9 (C5H4ipso); 128.1 (C6H4); 129.8 (C6H4); 137.1 (C6H4); 142.2 (C=N); 155.0 (C6H4). Mass spectrum (m/z): 397 [M+]. Anal. (%) Calc. for C18H19N3O2SFe: C, 54.42; H, 4.82 and N, 10.58; found: C, 54.46; H, 4.88 and N, 10.55.

CA inhibition studies

An Applied Photophysics stopped-flow instrument has been used for assaying the CA catalysed CO2 hydration activity. Phenol red (at a concentration of 0.2 mM) was used as indicator, working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) as buffer and 20 mM Na2SO4 (for maintaining constant the ionic strength), following the initial rates of the CA-catalysed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 10−100 s. The CO2 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination of the kinetic parameters and inhibition constants. For each inhibitor, at least six traces of the initial 5−10% of the reaction have been used for determining the initial velocity. The uncatalysed rates were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the total observed rates. Stock solutions of inhibitor (0.1 mM) were prepared in distilled−deionized water, and dilutions up to 0.01 nM were done thereafter with the assay buffer. Inhibitor and enzyme solutions were preincubated together for 6 h at room temperature prior to assay to allow for the formation of the E−I complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by nonlinear least-squares methods using PRISM 3 and the Cheng−Prusoff equation, as reported earlier, and represent the mean from at least three different determinations. All CA isoforms were recombinant ones obtained in-house as reported earlier,.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterisation of bioorganometallic-hydrazones derivatives from sulphanilamide

Continuing our interest in organometallic compounds with enzyme inhibitory properties, we decided to prepare such derivatives by using the imine bond formation between 4-hydrazino-benzenesulphonamide and organometallic derivatives incorporating aldehyde or methylketone functionalities. The bio-organometallic-hydrazones of the general formula [{(η5-C5H4)-C(R)=N-N(H)-C6H4-4-SO2NH2}]MLn(MLn = Re(CO)3, Mn(CO)3, FeCp; R=H, CH3) were thus prepared by the reaction between formyl or acetyl organometallic precursors and4-hydrazino-benzenesulphonamidein H2O (1a, 2a, 3a) or anhydrous ethanol (1b, 2b, 3b) in the presence of HCl (Scheme 1). The new compounds were isolated with moderate yields (48–56%) as brown (1a–b, 2a-b) or red (3a–b) solids after crystallization from acetone/hexane or THF/hexane, and exhibited good solubility in most polar organic solvents.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of organometallic-hydrazone derivatives 1–3.

Synthesis of organometallic-hydrazone derivatives 1–3. All compounds were characterised by electron impact (EI) mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, infra-red and NMR spectroscopies (Supporting Information). A strong molecular ion was shown in the mass spectrum of each organometallic-hydrazone, in addition to the detection of notable successive losses of CO ligands for the cyrhetrenyl (1a–b) and cymantrenyl (2a–b) derivatives (Supplementary Figure S1†). The elemental analysis data determined for all compounds is in agreement with their proposed formulas. The FT-IR spectra (KBr disk) of all compounds showed the expected absorption bands for the νN–H, νC=N and νSO2 stretches in the ranges of 3407–3202 cm−1, 1603–1560 cm−1 and 1330–1147 cm−1, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2†). Similar frequency values have been reported for others organic, and organometallic-hydrazones. In addition, IR analysis of compounds 1a–b and 2a–b revealed the presence of two intense bands in the region of 2025–1900 cm−1, that are characteristic of the asymmetric (νas) and symmetric (νs) stretchings of the terminal CO ligands of cyrhetrene and cymantrene derivatives (Supplementary Figure S3†). It is well-known that hydrazones may adopt two different forms (E- or Z-) in the solid state and also in solution. 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra of all compounds showed only one set of resonances, thus suggesting that only one of the two isomers was present in acetone-d6 solution at room temperature. On this regard, 1H-NMR spectra of 1a, 2a and 3a showed exhibited a sharp singlet was observed in the ranges of 7.80–7.64 ppm, and it was assigned to the iminic proton. In addition, a signal due to the methyl protons of the –C(CH3)=N–fragment was also observed at approximately δ 2.1 for compounds 1b, 2b and 3b. These results are in agreement with the values reported for organic and organometallic analogues,. In addition, the resonances observed between 8.16 and 7.11 ppm were assigned to the hydrogen atoms of the C6H4 ring. As per literature reports, the broad singlet observed at 6.90–6.28 ppm was assigned to the hydrogen nuclei of the SO2NH2 group,. Moreover, 1H NMR spectra for 1a-b and 2a-b showed sets of resonances in the region of 6.31–4.92 ppm, which are ascribed to the protons of the cyrhetrenyl and cymantrenyl moieties,. On this regard, the ferrocenyl derivatives 3a–b exhibited resonances around δ 4.82–4.30 due to the non-equivalent alpha and beta protons containing in the substituted Cp ring and a singlet in the region of 4.17–3.99 ppm, which was assigned to the proton resonances of the unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group,. The presence of the NH group registered as a broad singlet in the range of 9.9–8.7 ppm. Similar δ have been reported for other organometallic to sylhydrazones. It is important to note that the chemical shifts of the NH resonance showed a clear dependence on the presence of the organometallic moiety bound to the iminic entity. In fact, the downfield shift observed for the cyrhetrenyl (1a–b) and cymantrenyl (2a–b) tosyl HYDs (Δδ ∼ 0.30) compared with ferrocenyl analogues (3a–b) can be related to the electron-withdrawing properties of the (η5-C5H4)M(CO)3 moieties, which produce a deshielding of the NH resonance, thus, suggesting that the nature of the organometallic framework modifies the degree of electronic delocalisation on the –C(R) = N–NH– unit. We have found similar results for ferrocenyl and cyrhetrenyl 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and thiosemicarbazones. The 13C NMR data are also in agreement with the proposed structures, that is, all compounds showed the carbon nuclei of the organometallic fragments, C=N bridge and phenyl moiety. As expected, the resonances for the carbon atoms of the CH3 and C6H4 groups were observed at δ 21 and 155–110 and did not show any noticeable differences from those reported for the organic and organometallic analogues,. The most important feature of the 13C NMR spectra is the presence of a low field resonance (148–131 ppm), which was assigned to the iminyl carbon [C=N]. The carbon chemical shifts of this group for 1a, 2a and 3a also showed a clear dependence on the electronic properties of the organometallic moiety attached to it. The upfield shift observed for the cyrhetrenyl (1a) and cymantrenyl (2a) tosyl HYDs (∼132 ppm) compared with the ferrocenic analogue (3a) (140 ppm) can also be related to the opposite electronic effects of these organometallic moieties. This proposal is in agreement with the trend observed in the resonance of the NH proton mentioned above. We previously reported similar results for Schiff bases, thiosemicarbazones and hydrazones containing ferrocenyl and cyrhetrenyl moieties. This phenomenon is not observed in compounds 1b, 2b and 3b, in which the hydrazone fragment possess a methyl group attached to the C=N entity. In these cases, we believe that the inductive effect of the CH3 substituent could better stabilise any charge generated in the hydrazone entity; therefore, no difference in the iminyl carbon resonance would be evidenced. It is important to mention that all assignments were confirmed by 1H 13C NMRHSQC (Supplementary Figure S4†). The obtained sulphonamides (1–3)a,b were investigated for their CA inhibitory properties by using a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay and four human CA isoforms (hCA I, II, IX and XII) known to be drug targets (Table 1).
Table 1.

hCA I, II, IX and XII inhibition data with compounds (1–3)a,b and acetazolamide (AAZ) as standard drug, by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay [25].


KI (nM)a
 hCA IhCA IIhCA IXhCA XII
1a7.522.4579.824.4
2a5.98.22.13.1
3a13.21.749.94.9
1b3.79.725.03.8
2b268.611.2221.33.3
3b3.69.341.91.9
AAZ2501225.85.7

Mean from three different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ± 5–10% of the reported values).

hCA I, II, IX and XII inhibition data with compounds (1–3)a,b and acetazolamide (AAZ) as standard drug, by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay [25]. Mean from three different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ± 5–10% of the reported values). The new organometallic derivatives exhibited effective inhibition of the cytosolic isoforms hCA I and II, with inhibition constants in the range of 1.7–22.4 nM, except for 2b which was a moderate-weak hCA I inhibitor (KI of 286.6 nM; Table 1). Thus, apart this outlier compound 2b, the nature of the metal ion, the presence/absence of CO moieties or the aldehyde/ketone nature of the starting materials did not influence significantly the CA inhibitory properties. The ferrocenyl derivatives 3a and 3b were slightly more effective as CAIs compared to the structurally similar derivatives, but the differences were not impressive. Against hCA IX, a transmembrane, tumour-associated isoform, only 2a was a low nanomolar inhibitor, and 1b and 3b had KI values <50 nM. The remaining derivatives showed medium potency inhibitory action, with inhibition constants in the range of 221.3–579.8 nM. However, the second transmembrane, tumour-associated isoform hCA XII was effectively inhibited by all new compounds reported here, with KI values in the range of 1.9–24.4 nM. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) is thus quite flat, with a very modest range of variation in the inhibition constant values. Anyhow, the best CAI was 3b with an inhibition constant of 1.9 nM (ferrocenyl derivative) and the least effective one was the rhenium carbonyl derivative 1a with a KI of 24.4 nM.

Conclusion

A small number of organometallic benzenesulphonamide derivatives were obtained by reaction of aldehydes/ketones incorporating ferrocenyl or rhenium/manganese tricarbonyl moieties with 4-hydrazino-benzenesulphonamide. The new compounds were investigated as inhibitors of four pharmacologically relevant human CA isoforms, hCA I, II, IX and XII. The cytosolic isoforms hCA I and II were effectively inhibited by almost all derivatives with inhibition constants in the range of 1.7–22.4 nM. The same effect was observed for the tumour-associated transmembrane isoform hCA XII, for which KIs in the range of 1.9–24.4 nM were measured. hCA IX was on the other hand less sensitive to inhibition with these compounds, with only one derivative showing low nanomolar inhibitory action. The presence of metallo-organic or metallo-carbonyl moieties in the molecules of these CAIs makes them amenable for interesting pharmacologic applications, for example for compounds with CO donating properties. Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

Review 1.  How many carbonic anhydrase inhibition mechanisms exist?

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 2.  Acetazolamide for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 3.  Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Synthesis, biological activity, and mechanism of action of new 2-pyrimidinyl hydrazone and N-acylhydrazone derivatives, a potent and new classes of antileishmanial agents.

Authors:  Elaine Soares Coimbra; Marcus Vinícius Nora de Souza; Mariana Sequetto Terror; Alessandra Campbell Pinheiro; Juliana da Trindade Granato
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Antiglaucoma carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: a patent review.

Authors:  Emanuela Masini; Fabrizio Carta; Andrea Scozzafava; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 6.674

6.  Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Inhibition of human erythrocyte isozymes I and II with a series of antioxidant phenols.

Authors:  Murat Sentürk; Ilhami Gülçin; Arif Daştan; O Irfan Küfrevioğlu; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase IX targets primary tumors, metastases, and cancer stem cells: Three for the price of one.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran; Vincenzo Alterio; Anna Di Fiore; Katia D' Ambrosio; Fabrizio Carta; Simona Maria Monti; Giuseppina De Simone
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 12.944

Review 8.  Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition and the Management of Hypoxic Tumors.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2017-09-16

9.  Discovery of novel 1,3-diaryltriazene sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase I, II, VII, and IX inhibitors.

Authors:  Suleyman Akocak; Nabih Lolak; Silvia Bua; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.051

10.  Nanoemulsions of sulfonamide carbonic anhydrase inhibitors strongly inhibit the growth of Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Alane Beatriz Vermelho; Verônica da Silva Cardoso; Eduardo Ricci Junior; Elisabete Pereira Dos Santos; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  New Cu+2 Complexes with N-Sulfonamide Ligands: Potential Antitumor, Antibacterial, and Antioxidant Agents.

Authors:  Adriana Corina Hangan; Alexandru Turza; Roxana Liana Lucaciu; Bogdan Sevastre; Emőke Páll; Luminița Simona Oprean; Gheorghe Borodi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.