Literature DB >> 32037522

The role of intra-operative cell salvage in patient blood management for revision hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

A J R Palmer1, T D Lloyd1, V N Gibbs2, A Shah3, P Dhiman4, R Booth5, M F Murphy6, A H Taylor7, B J L Kendrick1.   

Abstract

Cell salvage is an important component of blood management in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty surgery. However concerns regarding efficacy and patient selection remain. The aims of this study were to describe intra-operative blood loss, cell salvage re-infusion volumes and red blood cell transfusion rates for revision hip procedures and to identify factors associated with the ability to salvage sufficient blood intra-operatively to permit processing and re-infusion. Data were collected from a prospective cohort of 664 consecutive patients undergoing revision hip surgery at a single tertiary centre from 31 March 2015 to 1 April 2018. Indications for revision surgery were aseptic (n = 393 (59%)) fracture (n = 160 (24%)) and infection (n = 111 (17%)). Salvaged blood was processed and re-infused when blood loss exceeded 500 ml. Mean (SD) intra-operative blood loss was 1038 (778) ml across all procedures. Salvaged blood was re-infused in 505 of 664 (76%) patients. Mean (SD) re-infusion volume was 253 (169) ml. In total, 246 of 664 (37%) patients received an allogeneic red blood cell transfusion within 72 h of surgery. Patients undergoing femoral component revision only (OR (95%CI) 0.41 (0.23-0.73)) or acetabular component revision only (0.53 (0.32-0.87)) were less likely to generate sufficient blood salvage volume for re-infusion compared with revision of both components. Compared with aseptic indications, patients undergoing revision surgery for infection (1.87 (1.04-3.36)) or fracture (4.43 (2.30-8.55)) were more likely to generate sufficient blood salvage volume for re-infusion. Our data suggest that cell salvage is efficacious in this population. Cases where the indication is infection or fracture and where both femoral and acetabular components are to be revised should be prioritised.
© 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaemia; arthroplasty; blood management; cell salvage; transfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32037522     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  4 in total

1.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

2.  Incidence and risk factors for blood transfusion in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Qiang Huang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  The role of intraoperative cell salvage for musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery.

Authors:  Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran; Antony J R Palmer; Duncan Whitwell; Thomas D A Cosker; David Pigott; Orosz Zsolt; Robert Booth; M R J P Gibbons; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.072

4.  The use of cell salvage during second-stage reimplantation for the treatment of chronic hip periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zunhan Liu; Xuetao Yang; En-Ze Zhao; Xufeng Wan; Guorui Cao; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.