| Literature DB >> 32036421 |
Domenico Pastore1, Benedetto Bruno2, Paola Carluccio3, Maria Stella De Candia4, Sonia Mammoliti5, Carlo Borghero6, Anna Chierichini7, Fabio Pavan8, Marco Casini9, Massimo Pini10, Luca Nassi11, Raffaella Greco12, Francesco Paolo Tambaro13, Paola Stefanoni14, Giuseppe Console15, Francesco Marchesi16, Luca Facchini17, Alberto Mussetti18, Michele Cimminiello19, Francesco Saglio20, Daniele Vincenti21, Sadia Falcioni22, Patrizia Chiusolo23, Jacopo Olivieri24, Annalisa Natale25, Maura Faraci26, Simone Cesaro27, Serena Marotta28, Anna Proia29, Irene Donnini30, Daniela Caravelli31, Eliana Zuffa32, Anna Paola Iori33, Elena Soncini34, Valentina Bozzoli35, Giovanni Pisapia36, Renato Scalone37, Oreste Villani38, Arcangelo Prete39, Antonella Ferrari40, Mariacristina Menconi41, Giorgia Mancini42, Federica Gigli43, Gianpaolo Gargiulo44, Barbara Bruno5, Francesca Patriarca45, Francesca Bonifazi46.
Abstract
A survey within hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) centers of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) was performed in order to describe current antiemetic prophylaxis in patients undergoing HSCT. The multicenter survey was performed by a questionnaire, covering the main areas on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): antiemetic prophylaxis guidelines used, antiemetic prophylaxis in different conditioning regimens, and methods of CINV evaluation. The survey was carried out in November 2016, and it was repeated 6 months after the publication of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) specific guidelines on antiemetic prophylaxis in HSCT. The results show a remarkable heterogeneity of prophylaxis among the various centers and a significant difference between the guidelines and the clinical practice. In the main conditioning regimens, the combination of a serotonin3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3-RA) with dexamethasone and neurokin1 receptor antagonist (NK1-RA), as recommended by MASCC/ESMO guidelines, increased from 0 to 15% (before the publication of the guidelines) to 9-30% (after the publication of the guidelines). This study shows a lack of compliance with specific antiemetic guidelines, resulting mainly in under-prophylaxis. Concerted strategies are required to improve the current CINV prophylaxis, to draft shared common guidelines, and to increase the knowledge and the adherence to the current recommendations for CINV prophylaxis in the specific field of HSCT.Entities:
Keywords: Antiemetic prophylaxis; CINV; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MASCC/ESMO guidelines
Year: 2020 PMID: 32036421 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-03945-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673