Cori A Cason1, Thomas M Kuntz2, Edmund B Chen1, Kelly Wun1, Michael J Nooromid1, Liqun Xiong1, Neil R Gottel2, Katharine G Harris3, Timothy C Morton4, Michael J Avram5, Eugene B Chang3, Jack A Gilbert2, Karen J Ho6. 1. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 4. Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Mary Beth Donnelley Clinical Pharmacology Core Facility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. 6. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: kho1@nm.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neointimal hyperplasia is a major contributor to restenosis after arterial interventions, but the genetic and environmental mechanisms underlying the variable propensity for neointimal hyperplasia between individuals, including the role of commensal microbiota, are not well understood. We sought to characterize how shifting the microbiome using cage sharing and bedding mixing between rats with differing restenosis phenotypes after carotid artery balloon angioplasty could alter arterial remodeling. METHODS: We co-housed and mixed bedding between genetically distinct rats (Lewis [LE] and Sprague-Dawley [SD]) that harbor different commensal microbes and that are known to have different neointimal hyperplasia responses to carotid artery balloon angioplasty. Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used to monitor changes in the gut microbiome. RESULTS: There were significant differences in neointimal hyperplasia between non-co-housed LE and SD rats 14 days after carotid artery angioplasty (mean intima + media [I + M] area, 0.117 ± 0.014 mm2 LE vs 0.275 ± 0.021 mm2 SD; P < .001) that were diminished by co-housing. Co-housing also altered local adventitial Ki67 immunoreactivity, local accumulation of leukocytes and macrophages (total and M2), and interleukin 17A concentration 3 days after surgery in each strain. Non-co-housed SD and LE rats had microbiomes distinguished by both weighted (P = .012) and unweighted (P < .001) UniFrac beta diversity distances, although without significant differences in alpha diversity. The difference in unweighted beta diversity between the fecal microbiota of SD and LE rats was significantly reduced by co-housing. Operational taxonomic units that significantly correlated with average I + M area include Parabacteroides distasonis, Desulfovibrio, Methanosphaera, Peptococcus, and Prevotella. Finally, serum concentrations of microbe-derived metabolites hydroxyanthranilic acid and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio were significantly associated with I + M area in both rat strains independent of co-housing. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel mechanism for how microbiome manipulations affect arterial remodeling and the inflammatory response after arterial injury. A greater understanding of the host inflammatory-microbe axis could uncover novel therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of restenosis.
BACKGROUND:Neointimal hyperplasiais a major contributor to restenosis after arterial interventions, but the genetic and environmental mechanisms underlying the variable propensity for neointimal hyperplasia between individuals, including the role of commensal microbiota, are not well understood. We sought to characterize how shifting the microbiome using cage sharing and bedding mixing between rats with differing restenosis phenotypes after carotid artery balloon angioplasty could alter arterial remodeling. METHODS: We co-housed and mixed bedding between genetically distinct rats (Lewis [LE] and Sprague-Dawley [SD]) that harbor different commensal microbes and that are known to have different neointimal hyperplasia responses to carotid artery balloon angioplasty. Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used to monitor changes in the gut microbiome. RESULTS: There were significant differences in neointimal hyperplasia between non-co-housed LE and SD rats 14 days after carotid artery angioplasty (mean intima + media [I + M] area, 0.117 ± 0.014 mm2 LE vs 0.275 ± 0.021 mm2 SD; P < .001) that were diminished by co-housing. Co-housing also altered local adventitial Ki67 immunoreactivity, local accumulation of leukocytes and macrophages (total and M2), and interleukin 17A concentration 3 days after surgery in each strain. Non-co-housed SD and LE rats had microbiomes distinguished by both weighted (P = .012) and unweighted (P < .001) UniFrac beta diversity distances, although without significant differences in alpha diversity. The difference in unweighted beta diversity between the fecal microbiota of SD and LE rats was significantly reduced by co-housing. Operational taxonomic units that significantly correlated with average I + M area include Parabacteroides distasonis, Desulfovibrio, Methanosphaera, Peptococcus, and Prevotella. Finally, serum concentrations of microbe-derived metabolites hydroxyanthranilic acid and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio were significantly associated with I + M area in both rat strains independent of co-housing. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel mechanism for how microbiome manipulations affect arterial remodeling and the inflammatory response after arterial injury. A greater understanding of the host inflammatory-microbe axis could uncover novel therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of restenosis.
Authors: William R Wikoff; Andrew T Anfora; Jun Liu; Peter G Schultz; Scott A Lesley; Eric C Peters; Gary Siuzdak Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Baohua Jiang; Yupu Deng; Colin Suen; Mohamad Taha; Ketul R Chaudhary; David W Courtman; Duncan J Stewart Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Stuart F W Kendrick; Graeme O'Boyle; Jelena Mann; Mujdat Zeybel; Jeremy Palmer; David E J Jones; Chris P Day Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: M H Abumaree; M A Al Jumah; B Kalionis; D Jawdat; A Al Khaldi; F M Abomaray; A S Fatani; L W Chamley; B A Knawy Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Peter Terness; Thomas M Bauer; Lars Röse; Christoph Dufter; Andrea Watzlik; Helmut Simon; Gerhard Opelz Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2002-08-19 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Jessica C Ezeji; Daven K Sarikonda; Austin Hopperton; Hailey L Erkkila; Daniel E Cohen; Sandra P Martinez; Fabio Cominelli; Tomomi Kuwahara; Armand E K Dichosa; Caryn E Good; Michael R Jacobs; Mikhail Khoretonenko; Alida Veloo; Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2021 Jan-Dec