Yuanyuan Li1, Ye Tian2, Feng Jin3, Weili Wu4, Jinhua Long4, Jinlin Ouyang5, Yan Zhou6. 1. Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China; Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. 2. Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. Electronic address: dryettian@126.com. 3. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. Electronic address: jinf8865@yeah.net. 4. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. 5. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China. 6. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to observe the feasibility and safety of addition of recombinant human endostatin injection to standard chemoradiation for the locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Current follow-up results updated long-term efficacy and late toxicity of the trial. METHODS:Between July 2012 and December 2013, we enrolled 114 patients that are older than 18 years with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳb nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 3 centers in Guizhou, China. Fifty six patients who receivedstandard chemoradiation combined with recombinant human endostatin injection (Endostar) were included in the study group. Another 58 patients were randomly assigned to the control group without using Endostar. Patients in both groups received the same 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy (Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 80 mg/m2), followed by 2 cycles of concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cisplatin (DDP; 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). The patients in the experimental group received 2 cycles Endostar (7.5 mg/m2 d8-d21 during induction chemotherapy and d1-d14 during concurrent chemoradiation). RESULTS: There were no significant differences of toxicities between the 2 groups. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy compliance between the 2 groups was similar. No hemorrhage and coagulation dysfunction in the experimental group were observed. There was a median follow-up of 67.1 months. Comparing the short-time effect of 3 months to the completion of chemoradiotherapy, there was a little higher objective response rate in the experimental group. Compared with the control group, the experimental group improved in the complete remission rate of cervical lymph node metastasis (91.1% vs 72.4%, χ2 = 3.897, P = 0.048). However, there was no significant difference in the curative effect of nasopharyngeal lesions between the 2 groups. (78.6% vs 74.1%, χ2 = 0.310, P = 0.578). The 5-year overall survival, progression-free of survival, metastasis-free survival, and locoregional failure-free survival rates in the 2 groups were 69.6%, 67.8%, 78.75, and 83.0%, respectively, for the experimental group, these rates were 73.2%, 80.1%, 81.7%, and 91.0%, respectively, and for the control group, no significant difference was found (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients show good tolerance and compliance with a manageable toxicity profile to the regimen of chemoradiation plus Endostar. There was a little higher objective response rate in the study group. A phase 3 randomized study is needed to substantiate our findings.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study aimed to observe the feasibility and safety of addition of recombinant humanendostatin injection to standard chemoradiation for the locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Current follow-up results updated long-term efficacy and late toxicity of the trial. METHODS: Between July 2012 and December 2013, we enrolled 114 patients that are older than 18 years with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳb nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 3 centers in Guizhou, China. Fifty six patients who received standard chemoradiation combined with recombinant humanendostatin injection (Endostar) were included in the study group. Another 58 patients were randomly assigned to the control group without using Endostar. Patients in both groups received the same 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy (Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 80 mg/m2), followed by 2 cycles of concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cisplatin (DDP; 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). The patients in the experimental group received 2 cycles Endostar (7.5 mg/m2 d8-d21 during induction chemotherapy and d1-d14 during concurrent chemoradiation). RESULTS: There were no significant differences of toxicities between the 2 groups. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy compliance between the 2 groups was similar. No hemorrhage and coagulation dysfunction in the experimental group were observed. There was a median follow-up of 67.1 months. Comparing the short-time effect of 3 months to the completion of chemoradiotherapy, there was a little higher objective response rate in the experimental group. Compared with the control group, the experimental group improved in the complete remission rate of cervical lymph node metastasis (91.1% vs 72.4%, χ2 = 3.897, P = 0.048). However, there was no significant difference in the curative effect of nasopharyngeal lesions between the 2 groups. (78.6% vs 74.1%, χ2 = 0.310, P = 0.578). The 5-year overall survival, progression-free of survival, metastasis-free survival, and locoregional failure-free survival rates in the 2 groups were 69.6%, 67.8%, 78.75, and 83.0%, respectively, for the experimental group, these rates were 73.2%, 80.1%, 81.7%, and 91.0%, respectively, and for the control group, no significant difference was found (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients show good tolerance and compliance with a manageable toxicity profile to the regimen of chemoradiation plus Endostar. There was a little higher objective response rate in the study group. A phase 3 randomized study is needed to substantiate our findings.