| Literature DB >> 32035482 |
Kim A Connelly1, Yanling Zhang2, Jean-François Desjardins2, Linda Nghiem2, Aylin Visram2, Sri N Batchu2, Verra G Yerra2, Golam Kabir2, Kerri Thai2, Andrew Advani2, Richard E Gilbert3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sodium-glucose linked cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the likelihood of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals with reduced ejection fraction heart failure. Because SGLT2 inhibitors lead to volume contraction with reductions in both preload and afterload, these load-dependent factors are thought to be major contributors to the cardioprotective effects of the drug class. Beyond these effects, we hypothesized that SGLT2 inhibitors may also improve intrinsic cardiac function, independent of loading conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Diastole; Heart failure reduced ejection fraction; Sodium–glucose linked co-transporter 2 inhibitor; Systole
Year: 2020 PMID: 32035482 PMCID: PMC7007658 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-020-0994-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Animal characteristics
| Sham + control | Sham + empa | MI + vehicle | MI + empa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 288 ± 4 | 267 ± 2* | 271 ± 3* | 257 ± 2*,† |
| Haemoglobin (g/L) | 131 ± 7 | 144 ± 3* | 143 ± 2* | 150 ± 3† |
| Plasma sodium (mmol/L) | 126 ± 2 | 128 ± 3 | 131 ± 1* | 133 ± 1† |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 |
| HW indexed to tibial length (mg/mm) | 18.1 ± 0.4 | 17.2 ± 0.3 | 18.9 ± 0.6 | 16.7 ± 0.3† |
| Lung weight indexed to tibial length (mg/mm) | 25 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 | 31 ± 3 | 24 ± 1† |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
N = 13–15 in sham Control and sham + Empagliflozin groups; N = 20 and 20 in MI Control and MI + Empagliflozin groups, respectively
Empa empagliflozin, LV weight/TL Left ventricular weight/tibial length, LW/TL lung weight/tibial length ratio
* p < 0.05 vs. sham control group
†p < 0.05 vs. MI control group
Echocardiographic parameters
| Sham + control | Sham + empa | MI + vehicle | MI + empa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 382 ± 6 | 343 ± 6 | 350 ± 7 | 336 ± 7 |
| Cardiac output (ml/min) | 77 ± 2 | 65 ± 1* | 56 ± 3*,‡ | 50 ± 2*,‡ |
| FS (%) | 56 ± 1 | 55 ± 1 | 21 ± 1* | 22 ± 2 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 8.6 ± 0.2* | 8.2 ± 0.2*,† |
| LVIDs (mm) | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.2* | 6.5 ± 0.2 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. N = 24 in sham + control and sham + empa groups; N = 23 and 25 in MI + vehicle and MI + Empa groups, respectively
Empa empagliflozin, HR heart rate, FS fractional shortening, LVIDd left ventricular internal diameter in diastole, LVIDs left ventricular internal diameter in systole
* p < 0.05 vs. sham control group
†p < 0.05 vs. MI + vehicle group
‡p < 0.05 vs. Sham + empa
Fig. 1Echocardiographic parameters: Representative parasternal short axis views of the LV (Bmode) in diastole (a) and systole (b) 1-week post LAD ligation. The anterolateral infarct is outlined with dotted yellow lines. M-mode imaging (c) reveals thinning of the left ventricular anterior wall (LVAWd), increased internal diameter (LVIDd) and reduced function. d–f represent quantitation of LV internal diameter in diastole, LV internal diameter in systole and fractional shortening. MI reduced FS and led to ventricular dilatation. LVIDd was reduced by empagliflozin therapy. *p < 0.05 MI versus sham, †p < 0.05 versus MI control
Invasive pressure volume loop parameters
| Sham + control | Sham + empa | MI + vehicle | MI + empa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP (mmHg) | 127 ± 4 | 146 ± 3 | 120 ± 4* | 132 ± 5† |
| dP/dtmax | 7623 ± 326 | 7903 ± 183 | 6010 ± 248 | 6292 ± 249 |
| dP/dtmin | − 7834 ± 417 | − 8234 ± 224 | − 4870 ± 251 | − 5248 ± 261 |
| PRSW (mmHg) | 74 ± 3 | 80 ± 3 | 62 ± 5* | 75 ± 6† |
| EDP (mmHg) | 11.1 ± 0.6 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | 16.0 ± 1* | 14 ± 1‡ |
| Tau (msec) | 12.0 ± 0.5 | 12.1 ± 0.3 | 17.1 ± 0.5* | 16.5 ± 0.5 |
| EDPVR (mmHg/s) | 0.029 ± 0.002 | 0.026 ± 0.002 | 0.046 ± 0.004* | 0.054 ± 0.005 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. N = 23–24 in sham + control and sham + empa groups; N = 19-23 in MI + vehicle and MI + empa groups
SBP systolic blood pressure, EDP end-diastolic pressure, dP/dt maximum rate of pressure rise, dP/dt maximal rate of pressure decline, EDPVR end-diastolic pressure volume relationship
* p < 0.05 vs. sham control group
†p < 0.05 vs. MI +vehicle group
‡p = 0.056 c/w MI + vehicle
Fig. 2Invasive Pressure Volume loop analysis: while reduced in the post-MI setting, both the end systolic pressure volume relationship, and the preload recruitable stroke work index, load insensitive markers of cardiac contractile function were significantly improved in rats that had received empagliflozin (a, b). *p < 0.05 MI versus sham, †p < 0.05 versus MI control
Fig. 3Representative hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Hearts of MI rats showed evidence of myocyte hypertrophy (Fig. 4c c/w sham animals 4a). Empagliflozin had no effect on either myocyte hypertrophy in either sham or MI animals (Fig. 4b, d) *p < 0.05 MI versus sham
Fig. 4Representative Collagen I and III stained sections. Hearts of MI rats showed evidence of excess extracellular matrix (c, G c/w sham animals a, e). Empagliflozin had no effect on either Collagen I or III positivity in either sham or MI animals (b, d, f, h). *p < 0.05 MI versus sham
Fig. 5Immunoblotting for cardiac proteins involved in calcium handling and contractility in Fischer F344 rats following sham surgery or left anterior descending artery ligation (MI) and treated with vehicle or empagliflozin (20 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage for 6 weeks beginning 1 week after surgery. a Serine 16 phosphorylated phospholamban (PLN). b Threonine 17 phosphorylated PLN. c Serine 473 phosphorylated Akt. d Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). e Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α (PGC-1α). f SERCA2a. n = 6/group. Values are mean ± S.D. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test