Literature DB >> 32035287

State of knowledge on the occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes.

I Guseva Canu1, K Batsungnoen2, A Maynard3, N B Hopf4.   

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) trigger fascination as well as anxiety, given their unique physical and chemical properties, and continuing concerns around their possible health effects. CNT exposure assessment is an integral component of occupational and environmental epidemiology, risk assessment, and management. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the quality of CNT occupational exposure assessments in field studies and to assess the relevance of available quantitative data from occupational hygiene and epidemiological perspectives. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for the period 2000-2018. To grade the quality of each study, we used a standardized grid of seven criteria. The first criterion addressed 12 items deemed most relevant CNT physical-chemical properties with respect to their in vitro and in vivo toxicity. We included 27 studies from 11 countries in the review and graded them high (n = 2), moderate (n = 15) and low quality (n = 10). Half of the studies measured elemental carbon mass concentration (EC) using different methods and aerosol fractions. In 85% of studies, the observed values exceed the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Limit. The quantification of CNT agglomerates and/or CNT contained fibers becomes increasingly common although lacking methodological standardization. Work activities with the greatest mean CNT mass concentrations were non-enclosed and included sieving, harvesting, packaging, reactor cleaning, extrusion and pelletizing. Some of the large studies defined standardized job titles according to exposure estimates at corresponding workstations and classified them by decreasing CNT exposure level: technicians > engineers > chemists. The already initiated harmonization of CNT exposure assessment and result reporting need to continue to favor not only studies in the field, but also to identify companies and workers using CNTs to characterize their exposures as well as monitor their health. This will enable an objective and realistic evaluation of risks associated with CNT applications and an appropriate risk management.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNT mass concentration; CNT number concentration; Exposure registry; Health surveillance; Nanotechnology; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32035287     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  7 in total

1.  Epigenetic Mechanisms in Understanding Nanomaterial-Induced Toxicity.

Authors:  Manosij Ghosh; Lode Godderis; Peter Hoet
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Assessment of the toxicity and carcinogenicity of double-walled carbon nanotubes in the rat lung after intratracheal instillation: a two-year study.

Authors:  Dina Mourad Saleh; Shengyong Luo; Omnia Hosny Mohamed Ahmed; David B Alexander; William T Alexander; Sivagami Gunasekaran; Ahmed M El-Gazzar; Mohamed Abdelgied; Takamasa Numano; Hiroshi Takase; Makoto Ohnishi; Susumu Tomono; Randa Hussein Abd El Hady; Katsumi Fukamachi; Jun Kanno; Akihiko Hirose; Jiegou Xu; Shugo Suzuki; Aya Naiki-Ito; Satoru Takahashi; Hiroyuki Tsuda
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 9.112

3.  Carbon Nanotubes: Probabilistic Approach for Occupational Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Carolina Zellino; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico M Cavallo
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  Physicochemical characterization and genotoxicity of the broad class of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers used or produced in U.S. facilities.

Authors:  Kelly Fraser; Vamsi Kodali; Naveena Yanamala; M Eileen Birch; Lorenzo Cena; Gary Casuccio; Kristin Bunker; Traci L Lersch; Douglas E Evans; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Mary Ann Hammer; Michael L Kashon; Theresa Boots; Tracy Eye; John Hubczak; Sherri A Friend; Matthew Dahm; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Katelyn Siegrist; David Lowry; Alison K Bauer; Linda M Sargent; Aaron Erdely
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 9.400

5.  Differential modulation of lung aquaporins among other pathophysiological markers in acute (Cl2 gas) and chronic (carbon nanoparticles, cigarette smoke) respiratory toxicity mouse models.

Authors:  Sukanta S Bhattacharya; Brijesh Yadav; Ekta Yadav; Ariel Hus; Niket Yadav; Perminder Kaur; Lauren Rosen; Roman Jandarov; Jagjit S Yadav
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 6.  Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibres: More Than a Cobweb.

Authors:  Enrico Bergamaschi; Giacomo Garzaro; Georgia Wilson Jones; Martina Buglisi; Michele Caniglia; Alessandro Godono; Davide Bosio; Ivana Fenoglio; Irina Guseva Canu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Toxicity of poly-dispersed single-walled carbon nanotubes on bone marrow derived Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Md Babu Mia; Rajiv K Saxena
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.