| Literature DB >> 32034551 |
Helmut Schütz1, Detlew Labes2, Michael Tomashevskiy3, Mario González-de la Parra4, Anastasia Shitova5, Anders Fuglsang6.
Abstract
In order to help companies qualify and validate the software used to evaluate bioequivalence trials in a replicate design intended for average bioequivalence with expanding limits, this work aims to define datasets with known results. This paper releases 30 reference datasets into the public domain along with proposed consensus results. A proposal is made for results that should be used as validation targets. The datasets were evaluated by seven different software packages according to methods proposed by the European Medicines Agency. For the estimation of CVwR and Method A, all software packages produced results that are in agreement across all datasets. Due to different approximations of the degrees of freedom, slight differences were observed in two software packages for Method B in highly incomplete datasets. All software packages were suitable for the estimation of CVwR and Method A. For Method B, different methods for approximating the denominator degrees of freedom could lead to slight differences, which eventually could lead to contrary decisions in very rare borderline cases.Keywords: average bioequivalence with expanding limits; black box software validation; reference scaling; replicate designs
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32034551 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-0427-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AAPS J ISSN: 1550-7416 Impact factor: 4.009