Literature DB >> 32034551

Reference Datasets for Studies in a Replicate Design Intended for Average Bioequivalence with Expanding Limits.

Helmut Schütz1, Detlew Labes2, Michael Tomashevskiy3, Mario González-de la Parra4, Anastasia Shitova5, Anders Fuglsang6.   

Abstract

In order to help companies qualify and validate the software used to evaluate bioequivalence trials in a replicate design intended for average bioequivalence with expanding limits, this work aims to define datasets with known results. This paper releases 30 reference datasets into the public domain along with proposed consensus results. A proposal is made for results that should be used as validation targets. The datasets were evaluated by seven different software packages according to methods proposed by the European Medicines Agency. For the estimation of CVwR and Method A, all software packages produced results that are in agreement across all datasets. Due to different approximations of the degrees of freedom, slight differences were observed in two software packages for Method B in highly incomplete datasets. All software packages were suitable for the estimation of CVwR and Method A. For Method B, different methods for approximating the denominator degrees of freedom could lead to slight differences, which eventually could lead to contrary decisions in very rare borderline cases.

Keywords:  average bioequivalence with expanding limits; black box software validation; reference scaling; replicate designs

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32034551     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-0427-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  8 in total

1.  Individual bioequivalence testing under 2x3 designs.

Authors:  Shein-Chung Chow; Jun Shao; Hansheng Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Viewpoint: observations on scaled average bioequivalence.

Authors:  Scott D Patterson; Byron Jones
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.894

3.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence.

Authors:  Laszlo Tothfalusi; Laszlo Endrenyi; Alfredo Garcia Arieta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Reference datasets for bioequivalence trials in a two-group parallel design.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang; Helmut Schütz; Detlew Labes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Reference datasets for 2-treatment, 2-sequence, 2-period bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  Helmut Schütz; Detlew Labes; Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Two-period design with t2 experimental units.

Authors:  L N Balaam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.