Literature DB >> 3203451

Detection of interruptions in the breathing gas of ventilated anaesthetized patients.

J A McEwen1, C F Small, L C Jenkins.   

Abstract

Interruption of the breathing gas to a ventilated anaesthetized patient due to accidental disconnection or anaesthesia system malfunction may have serious consequences if not detected quickly. A series of tests which covers the range of foreseeable mechanical problems was developed and used to test the performance of three breathing gas interruption monitors, two commercially available and one developed at Vancouver General Hospital. The tests were designed to evaluate the performance of monitors as installed on anaesthesia systems under a variety of failure conditions, including endotracheal tube disconnection with and without occlusion of the opening, kinks in the inspiratory and fresh gas hoses, disconnection of the fresh gas hose, leaks in the breathing circuit, excessive high or low pressure in the scavenging circuit, continuing high breathing circuit pressure, and kinks in the circuit pressure sensing hose. Ability to detect both significant changes in ventilation variables and faults existing at initiation of ventilation were also tested over a representative range of ventilator and patient variables using circle, coaxial and paediatric circuits. Only complete endotracheal tube disconnections with no obstruction of the opening were reliably detected by all three monitors. A commercial monitor with a single fixed-threshold alarm level also detected fresh gas interruptions in circle and adult coaxial circuits, but failed to alarm in response to any other fault condition. A monitor with selectable pressure thresholds and high, low, and continuing pressure limits detected just under half of the fault conditions. A microprocessor-based monitor developed at Vancouver General Hospital detected and correctly identified roughly 80 per cent of the faults. The series of tests forms the basis for a Canadian Standards Association Preliminary Standard (Z168.10) and will allow hospitals to test the performance of breathing gas interruption monitors in use in their institutions. Comments on the test series are solicited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3203451     DOI: 10.1007/BF03020339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  76 in total

1.  Failed release of an activated oxygen flush valve.

Authors:  P L Bailey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  A hazard with a vaporizer.

Authors:  P D Cooper
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Internal mis-mating of breathing system components.

Authors:  I A Sloan; N K Ironside
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-09

4.  Toward prevention of anesthetic mishaps.

Authors:  J B Cooper
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1984

5.  Adhesive tape obstructing an anesthetic circuit.

Authors:  D Z Frankel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Circuit connectors.

Authors:  A K Bacon
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  An unusual cause of leakage in an anesthesia system is more usual than it should be.

Authors:  S H Rolbin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Leak from an oxygen flowmeter.

Authors:  L Rendell-Baker
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Apparatus misconnection: Mapleson D systems and scavenging.

Authors:  J Pfitzner
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 1.669

10.  Possible hazards with an anaesthetic gas scavenging system.

Authors:  A Seymour
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 6.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.